during the tracking of zfs-2.0.x integration in debian upstream I did
not notice that the library packages got renamed yet another time (see
[0]) to match the soname version.
This patch renames our library packagenames to match debian upstream
and includes Breaks,Depends on the intermediate versions we shipped
with the zfs-2.0.3 release.
Noticed while checking an issue (with `aptitude` vs. `apt`) reported
on pve-user.
Tested on a VM running our latest packages and on one still running
zfs 0.8.5
[0] 42ba750f8c
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
the patch fixes a potential panic on systems running ZFS > 2.0.0 and
is already queued for inclusion in 2.0.3 - see [0] for a related
github issue.
[0] https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11474
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
by taking the current version from debian-upstream.
The only addition is an attribution for Proxmox for the files in
debian/*
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
ZFS includes (since 2.0.0) a pam-module, which takes the login
credentials of an user to unlock their home-dataset.
Enabling it in its current state can cause some side-effects like
prompting for a password when running `su` as root (see [0]).
Our update to ZFS 2.0.0 shipped the pam config in zfsutils-linux,
whereas debian-upstream split it out into its own optional package
This commit adopts this change.
based on debian-upstream [1] commit
cad2f3d24aa44cfdce1e2eae8b6ba027efaba2d6
The issue becomes apparent by installing the current zfsutils-linux
package and running `pam-auth-update --package` (e.g. by installing
an upgraded libpam-runtime package).
[0] https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11222
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/zfsonlinux-team/zfs/
Reported-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Originally-by: Antonio Russo <aerusso@aerusso.net>
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
It's included as link in /usr/bin there, so the grep matched it
twice, the actual file plus the link, resulting in a build failure.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
upstream commit 2d2ce04b9931927ffd045f9ebba3d39d4d31f7db changed the location
for installing pkgconfig files to the architecture specific one in /lib
instead of /usr/share - this patch reflects the change in
'debian/libzfslinux-dev.install'.
It follows the change from 9a04c500f17d8df20a017137211d0984cace98ff in
debian's repository [0].
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/zfsonlinux-team/zfs.git
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
This patch addresses the problems some users experience when some zpools are
created/imported with cachefile (which then causes other pools not to get
imported during boot) - when our tooling creates a pool we explictly
instantiate the service with the pool's name, ensuring that it will get
imported by scanning.
Suggested-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
adapted from debian-upstream [0] commit
53276c973c5e69f75b43371a6c94adc5d9dcfec0
(the systemd sequence is enabled by default since debhelper v10 - see
debhelper(7))
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/zfsonlinux-team/zfs.git
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
/etc/default/zfs and /etc/zfs/zfs-functions are now installed by the
makefiles. Continue to install them directly as before, but do not
--fail-missing because of them.
adapted from debian-upstream [0] commit
9a594875114fe186aebba2776b14817ab7f272ae
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/zfsonlinux-team/zfs.git
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
the last series of cherry-picks from salsa.d.o includes one patch for the
zfs-source, but the patch file does not contain ident-information.
This prevents it from being applied by import-patchqueue.
Fixed by adding ident based on the original patches commit message and
importing and exporting the patchqueue.
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Of the zedlet scripts shipped by upstream, a subset are enabled by
default, by creating symlinks in /etc/zfs/zed.d. These symlinks are
shipped in the zfs-zed package. dpkg, however, does not support
conffile handling of symlinks, and therefore any changes (removals) to
the symlinks are not preserved on package upgrade.
To address this policy violation, we:
1. During package build, create a list of enabled-by-default zedlets,
instead of creating symlinks.
2. On package removal, identify all enabled-by-default zedlets whose
symlinks do not exist (i.e., were removed by the user). This is done
by creating "whiteout" links to /dev/null in their place).
3. On package installation, create links to enabled-by-default zedlets
UNLESS there is already a file there (i.e., abort if there is a
whiteout link).
4. We also clean up broken symlinks to removed zedlets at package
postinst.
(cherry picked and adapted from 5cee380324d74e640d5dd7a360faba3994c8007f [0])
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/zfsonlinux-team/zfs.git
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
If a pool is already scrubbing, zpool scrub will return an error. This
breaks the cron scrub script. It outputs that error and then does not
scrub any further pools.
This change checks to see if the pool is scrubbing before attempting to
start a scrub. This addresses long-running scrubs. Note that a
"long-running" scrub here is not necessarily a month long. If the
system is shut off or the pool is exported, the scrub will resume later.
(cherry picked from 41e457da7bfc837a52f3389cb6961bc6737b874d [0])
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/zfsonlinux-team/zfs.git
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
This reduces the required time for the configure step drastically,
from previous:
# time ./configure --with-config=kernel
-> 124.14s user 34.06s system 103% cpu 2:32.90 total
to now:
# time ./configure --with-config=kernel
-> 75.07s user 15.01s system 394% cpu 22.821 total
(152 seconds vs 22 seconds)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
The copy command:
# cp -a ${ZFSSRC}/* ${ZFSDIR}/
did not copied over hidden files (those beginning with a dot) and
thus a upstream patches which changed also .gitignore did not worked
when copied over 1:1, instead of removing the changes to .gitignore
it's IMO better to copy the full sources ensuring the whole state of
the upstream project source repo is used.
With submodules we still do not copy over a potential big .git
folder, as we as submodule user have the submodules .git state in our
.git/modules folder where the submodule just references to.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
That's why it was guarded with the "HAVE_KERNEL_FPU_INITIALIZED"
defined in the first place..
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
