Commit Graph

65 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Dagnelie
30af21b025 Implement Redacted Send/Receive
Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to 
a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not 
transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or 
analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating 
unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools 
like zrepl.

Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or 
clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this 
clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or
modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction 
snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used 
to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the 
list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction 
snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter 
to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the
redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive 
or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send 
stream.  When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it 
contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those 
blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the 
creation_txg of the redaction bookmark.  This step is necessary to 
allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are 
accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot.

The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve 
adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the 
life cycles of these deadlists.

The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously 
an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send 
is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime 
significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate.

Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Closes #7958
2019-06-19 09:48:12 -07:00
Tom Caputi
c08c30ed13 Fix incorrect error message for raw receive
This patch fixes an incorrect error message that comes up when
doing a non-forcing, raw, incremental receive into a dataset
that has a newer snapshot than the "from" snapshot. In this
case, the current code prints a confusing message about an IVset
guid mismatch.

This functionality is supported by non-raw receives as an
undocumented feature, but was never supported by the raw receive
code. If this is desired in the future, we can probably figure
out a way to make it work.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Issue #8758 
Closes #8863
2019-06-10 09:45:08 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf
caf9dd209f
Fix send/recv lost spill block
When receiving a DRR_OBJECT record the receive_object() function
needs to determine how to handle a spill block associated with the
object.  It may need to be removed or kept depending on how the
object was modified at the source.

This determination is currently accomplished using a heuristic which
takes in to account the DRR_OBJECT record and the existing object
properties.  This is a problem because there isn't quite enough
information available to do the right thing under all circumstances.
For example, when only the block size changes the spill block is
removed when it should be kept.

What's needed to resolve this is an additional flag in the DRR_OBJECT
which indicates if the object being received references a spill block.
The DRR_OBJECT_SPILL flag was added for this purpose.  When set then
the object references a spill block and it must be kept.  Either
it is update to date, or it will be replaced by a subsequent DRR_SPILL
record.  Conversely, if the object being received doesn't reference
a spill block then any existing spill block should always be removed.

Since previous versions of ZFS do not understand this new flag
additional DRR_SPILL records will be inserted in to the stream.
This has the advantage of being fully backward compatible.  Existing
ZFS systems receiving this stream will recreate the spill block if
it was incorrectly removed.  Updated ZFS versions will correctly
ignore the additional spill blocks which can be identified by
checking for the DRR_SPILL_UNMODIFIED flag.

The small downside to this approach is that is may increase the size
of the stream and of the received snapshot on previous versions of
ZFS.  Additionally, when receiving streams generated by previous
unpatched versions of ZFS spill blocks may still be lost.

OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9952
FreeBSD-issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233277

Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #8668
2019-05-07 15:18:44 -07:00
Tom Caputi
c2c6eadf29 Fix issues with truncated files in raw sends
When receiving a raw send stream only reallocated objects
whose contents were not freed by the standard indicators
should call dmu_free_long_range().

Furthermore, if calling dmu_free_long_range() is required
then the objects current block size must be used and not
the new block size.

Two additional test cases were added to provided realistic
test coverage for processing reallocated objects which are
part of a raw receive.

Reviewed-by: Olaf Faaland <faaland1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes #8528
Closes #8607
2019-04-15 15:28:48 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf
b92f5d9f82
Fix issue in receive_object() during reallocation
When receiving an object to a previously allocated interior slot
the new object should be "allocated" by setting DMU_NEW_OBJECT,
not "reallocated" with dnode_reallocate().  For resilience verify
the slot is free as required in case the stream is malformed.

Add a test case to generate more realistic incremental send streams
that force reallocation to occur during the receive.

Reviewed-by: Olaf Faaland <faaland1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #8067 
Closes #8614
2019-04-12 14:28:04 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf
3fa93bb8d3
Fix TXG_MASK cstyle
Fix style issue for 'tx->tx_txg&TXG_MASK'.  There should be white
space around the '&' character.  Split the dnode_reallocate() ASSERT
to make it more readable to clearly separate the checks.

Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #8606
2019-04-12 11:30:59 -07:00
Brian Behlendorf
d93d4b1acd
Revert "Fix issues with truncated files in raw sends"
This partially reverts commit 5dbf8b4ed.  This change resolved
the issues observed with truncated files in raw sends.  However,
the required changes to dnode_allocate() introduced a regression
for non-raw streams which needs to be understood.

The additional debugging improvements from the original patch
were not reverted.

Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #7378
Issue #8528
Issue #8540
Issue #8565
Close #8584
2019-04-05 17:32:56 -07:00
Tom Caputi
5dbf8b4edd Fix issues with truncated files in raw sends
This patch fixes a few issues with raw receives involving
truncated files:

* dnode_reallocate() now calls dnode_set_blksz() instead of
  dnode_setdblksz(). This ensures that any remaining dbufs with
  blkid 0 are resized along with their containing dnode upon
  reallocation.

* One of the calls to dmu_free_long_range() in receive_object()
  needs to check that the object it is about to free some contents
  or hasn't been completely removed already by a previous call to
  dmu_free_long_object() in the same function.

* The same call to dmu_free_long_range() in the previous point
  needs to ensure it uses the object's current block size and
  not the new block size. This ensures the blocks of the object
  that are supposed to be freed are completely removed and not
  simply partially zeroed out.

This patch also adds handling for DRR_OBJECT_RANGE records to
dprintf_drr() for debugging purposes.

Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes #7378 
Closes #8528
2019-03-27 11:30:48 -07:00
Tom Caputi
f00ab3f22c Detect and prevent mixed raw and non-raw sends
Currently, there is an issue in the raw receive code where
raw receives are allowed to happen on top of previously
non-raw received datasets. This is a problem because the
source-side dataset doesn't know about how the blocks on
the destination were encrypted. As a result, any MAC in
the objset's checksum-of-MACs tree that is a parent of both
blocks encrypted on the source and blocks encrypted by the
destination will be incorrect. This will result in
authentication errors when we decrypt the dataset.

This patch fixes this issue by adding a new check to the
raw receive code. The code now maintains an "IVset guid",
which acts as an identifier for the set of IVs used to
encrypt a given snapshot. When a snapshot is raw received,
the destination snapshot will take this value from the
DRR_BEGIN payload. Non-raw receives and normal "zfs snap"
operations will cause ZFS to generate a new IVset guid.
When a raw incremental stream is received, ZFS will check
that the "from" IVset guid in the stream matches that of
the "from" destination snapshot. If they do not match, the
code will error out the receive, preventing the problem.

This patch requires an on-disk format change to add the
IVset guids to snapshots and bookmarks. As a result, this
patch has errata handling and a tunable to help affected
users resolve the issue with as little interruption as
possible.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes #8308
2019-03-13 11:00:43 -07:00
Tom Caputi
369aa501d1 Fix handling of maxblkid for raw sends
Currently, the receive code can create an unreadable dataset from
a correct raw send stream. This is because it is currently
impossible to set maxblkid to a lower value without freeing the
associated object. This means truncating files on the send side
to a non-0 size could result in corruption. This patch solves this
issue by adding a new 'force' flag to dnode_new_blkid() which will
allow the raw receive code to force the DMU to accept the provided
maxblkid even if it is a lower value than the existing one.

For testing purposes the send_encrypted_files.ksh test has been
extended to include a variety of truncated files and multiple
snapshots. It also now leverages the xattrtest command to help
ensure raw receives correctly handle xattrs.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes #8168 
Closes #8487
2019-03-13 10:52:01 -07:00
loli10K
d8d418ff0c ZVOLs should not be allowed to have children
zfs create, receive and rename can bypass this hierarchy rule. Update
both userland and kernel module to prevent this issue and use pyzfs
unit tests to exercise the ioctls directly.

Note: this commit slightly changes zfs_ioc_create() ABI. This allow to
differentiate a generic error (EINVAL) from the specific case where we
tried to create a dataset below a ZVOL (ZFS_ERR_WRONG_PARENT).

Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
2019-02-08 15:44:15 -08:00
Tom Caputi
960347d3a6 Fix 0 byte memory leak in zfs receive
Currently, when a DRR_OBJECT record is read into memory in
receive_read_record(), memory is allocated for the bonus buffer.
However, if the object doesn't have a bonus buffer the code will
still "allocate" the zero bytes, but the memory will not be passed
to the processing thread for cleanup later. This causes the spl
kmem tracking code to report a leak. This patch simply changes the
code so that it only allocates this memory if it has a non-zero
length.

Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes #8266
2019-01-18 11:06:48 -08:00
Tom Caputi
305781da4b Fix error handling incallers of dbuf_hold_level()
Currently, the functions dbuf_prefetch_indirect_done() and
dmu_assign_arcbuf_by_dnode() assume that dbuf_hold_level() cannot
fail. In the event of an error the former will cause a NULL pointer
dereference and the later will trigger a VERIFY. This patch adds
error handling to these functions and their callers where necessary.

Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes #8291
2019-01-17 15:47:08 -08:00
Brian Behlendorf
6955b40138
Provide more flexible object allocation interface
Object allocation performance can be improved for complex operations
by providing an interface which returns the newly allocated dnode.
This allows the caller to immediately use the dnode without incurring
the expense of looking up the dnode by object number.

The functions dmu_object_alloc_hold(), zap_create_hold(), and
dmu_bonus_hold_by_dnode() were added for this purpose.

The zap_create_* functions have been updated to take advantage of
this new functionality.  The dmu_bonus_hold_impl() function should
really have never been included in sys/dmu.h and was removed.
It's sole caller was converted to use dmu_bonus_hold_by_dnode().

The new symbols have been exported for use by Lustre.

Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #8015
2019-01-10 14:37:43 -08:00
Paul Dagnelie
0391690583 Refactor dmu_recv into its own file
This change moves the bottom half of dmu_send.c (where the receive
logic is kept) into a new file, dmu_recv.c, and does similarly
for receive-related changes in header files.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Closes #7982
2018-10-09 14:05:13 -07:00