Unlike DDT, where ZAP values may have different lengths due to
compression, all BRT entries are identical 8-byte counters. It
does not make sense to first fetch the length only to assert it.
zap_lookup_uint64() is specifically designed to work with counters
of different size and should return error if something odd found.
Calling it straight allows to save some measurable CPU time.
Reviewed-by: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pawel@dawidek.net>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Rob Norris <robn@despairlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#15950
Similar to DDT make BRT data and indirect block sizes configurable
via module parameters. I am not sure what would be the best yet,
but similar to DDT 4KB blocks kill all chances of compression on
vdev with ashift=12 or more, that on my tests reaches 3x.
While here, fix documentation for respective DDT parameters.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#15967
Since brt_pending_apply() is running in syncing context, no other
brt_pending_tree accesses are possible for the TXG. We don't need
to acquire brt_pending_lock here.
Reviewed-by: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pawel@dawidek.net>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Rob Norris <robn@despairlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#15955
Before this change ZAP called dnode_hold() for almost every block
access, that was clearly visible in profiler under heavy load, such
as BRT. This patch makes it always hold the dnode reference between
zap_lockdir() and zap_unlockdir(). It allows to avoid most of dnode
operations between those. It also adds several new _by_dnode() APIs
to ZAP and uses them in BRT code. Also adds dmu_prefetch_by_dnode()
variant and uses it in the ZAP code.
After this there remains only one call to dmu_buf_dnode_enter(),
which seems to be unneeded. So remove the call and the functions.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#15951
If there is a pending entry for this block, then we've already
issued BRT prefetch for it within this TXG, so don't do it again.
BRT vdev lookup and following zap_prefetch_uint64() call can be
pretty expensive and should be avoided when not necessary.
Reviewed-by: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pawel@dawidek.net>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#15941
It does not look important how exactly brt_pending_tree is sorted.
When cloning large file, it is quite likely that all of its blocks
have identical physical birth times, so comparing them first does
not provide useful entropy, while accesses additional cache line.
In most cases combination of vdev and offset provides unique result
and physical birth time comparison is not even needed. Meanwhile,
when traversing the tree inside brt_pending_apply(), it can be
beneficial for dbuf cache and CPU cache hits to group processing
by vdev and so by the per-VDEV BRT ZAPs.
Reviewed-by: Rob Norris <robn@despairlabs.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#15954
Without this patch on pool of 60 vdevs with ZFS_DEBUG enabled clone
takes much more time than copy, while heavily trashing dbgmsg for
no good reason, repeatedly dumping all vdevs BRTs again and again,
even unmodified ones.
I am generally not sure this dumping is not excessive, but decided
to keep it for now, just restricting its scope to more reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#15625
When two datasets share the same master encryption key, it is safe
to clone encrypted blocks. Currently only snapshots and clones
of a dataset share with it the same encryption key.
Added a test for:
- Clone from encrypted sibling to encrypted sibling with
non encrypted parent
- Clone from encrypted parent to inherited encrypted child
- Clone from child to sibling with encrypted parent
- Clone from snapshot to the original datasets
- Clone from foreign snapshot to a foreign dataset
- Cloning from non-encrypted to encrypted datasets
- Cloning from encrypted to non-encrypted datasets
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Original-patch-by: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pawel@dawidek.net>
Signed-off-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Closes#15544
zil_claim_clone_range() takes references on cloned blocks before ZIL
replay. Later zil_free_clone_range() drops them after replay or on
dataset destroy. The total balance is neutral. It means on actual
replay we must take additional references, which would stay in BRT.
Without this blocks could be freed prematurely when either original
file or its clone are destroyed. I've observed BRT being emptied
and the feature being deactivated after ZIL replay completion, which
should not have happened. With the patch I see expected stats.
Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Rob Norris <robn@despairlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#15603
So that zdb (and others!) can get at the BRT on-disk structures.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <robn@despairlabs.com>
Closes#15541
Return the more descriptive error codes instead of `EXDEV` when
the parameters don't match the requirements of the clone function.
Updated the comments in `brt.c` accordingly.
The first three errors are just invalid parameters, which zfs can
not handle.
The fourth error indicates that the block which should be cloned
is created and cloned or modified in the same transaction
group (`txg`).
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Rob Norris <rob.norris@klarasystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Closes#15148
This gives `zdb -b` support for clone blocks.
Previously, it didn't know what clones were, so would count their space
allocation multiple times and then report leaked space (or, in debug,
would assert trying to claim blocks a second time).
This commit fixes those bugs, and reports the number of clones and the
space "used" (saved) by them.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <rob.norris@klarasystems.com>
Sponsored-By: OpenDrives Inc.
Sponsored-By: Klara Inc.
Closes#15123
bv_entcount can be a relatively large allocation (see comment for
BRT_RANGESIZE), so get it from the big allocator.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <rob.norris@klarasystems.com>
Sponsored-By: OpenDrives Inc.
Sponsored-By: Klara Inc.
Closes#15050
The commit replaces all findings of the link:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing with this one:
https://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: WHR <msl0000023508@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tino Reichardt <milky-zfs@mcmilk.de>
Closes#14625
Block Cloning allows to manually clone a file (or a subset of its
blocks) into another (or the same) file by just creating additional
references to the data blocks without copying the data itself.
Those references are kept in the Block Reference Tables (BRTs).
The whole design of block cloning is documented in module/zfs/brt.c.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Schwarz <christian.schwarz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pawel@dawidek.net>
Closes#13392
