This fixes a hole in the situation where the resume state is left from
receiving a new dataset and, so, the state is set on the dataset itself
(as opposed to %recv child).
Additionally, distinguish incremental and resume streams in error
messages.
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#9252
When encryption was first added to ZFS, we made a decision to
prevent users from creating unencrypted children of encrypted
datasets. The idea was to prevent users from inadvertently
leaving some of their data unencrypted. However, since the
release of 0.8.0, some legitimate reasons have been brought up
for this behavior to be allowed. This patch simply removes this
limitation from all code paths that had checks for it and updates
the tests accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Jason King <jason.king@joyent.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes#8737Closes#8870
This patch fixes an incorrect error message that comes up when
doing a non-forcing, raw, incremental receive into a dataset
that has a newer snapshot than the "from" snapshot. In this
case, the current code prints a confusing message about an IVset
guid mismatch.
This functionality is supported by non-raw receives as an
undocumented feature, but was never supported by the raw receive
code. If this is desired in the future, we can probably figure
out a way to make it work.
Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Issue #8758Closes#8863
When receiving a DRR_OBJECT record the receive_object() function
needs to determine how to handle a spill block associated with the
object. It may need to be removed or kept depending on how the
object was modified at the source.
This determination is currently accomplished using a heuristic which
takes in to account the DRR_OBJECT record and the existing object
properties. This is a problem because there isn't quite enough
information available to do the right thing under all circumstances.
For example, when only the block size changes the spill block is
removed when it should be kept.
What's needed to resolve this is an additional flag in the DRR_OBJECT
which indicates if the object being received references a spill block.
The DRR_OBJECT_SPILL flag was added for this purpose. When set then
the object references a spill block and it must be kept. Either
it is update to date, or it will be replaced by a subsequent DRR_SPILL
record. Conversely, if the object being received doesn't reference
a spill block then any existing spill block should always be removed.
Since previous versions of ZFS do not understand this new flag
additional DRR_SPILL records will be inserted in to the stream.
This has the advantage of being fully backward compatible. Existing
ZFS systems receiving this stream will recreate the spill block if
it was incorrectly removed. Updated ZFS versions will correctly
ignore the additional spill blocks which can be identified by
checking for the DRR_SPILL_UNMODIFIED flag.
The small downside to this approach is that is may increase the size
of the stream and of the received snapshot on previous versions of
ZFS. Additionally, when receiving streams generated by previous
unpatched versions of ZFS spill blocks may still be lost.
OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9952
FreeBSD-issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233277
Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#8668
When receiving a raw send stream only reallocated objects
whose contents were not freed by the standard indicators
should call dmu_free_long_range().
Furthermore, if calling dmu_free_long_range() is required
then the objects current block size must be used and not
the new block size.
Two additional test cases were added to provided realistic
test coverage for processing reallocated objects which are
part of a raw receive.
Reviewed-by: Olaf Faaland <faaland1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes#8528Closes#8607
When receiving an object to a previously allocated interior slot
the new object should be "allocated" by setting DMU_NEW_OBJECT,
not "reallocated" with dnode_reallocate(). For resilience verify
the slot is free as required in case the stream is malformed.
Add a test case to generate more realistic incremental send streams
that force reallocation to occur during the receive.
Reviewed-by: Olaf Faaland <faaland1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#8067Closes#8614
Fix style issue for 'tx->tx_txg&TXG_MASK'. There should be white
space around the '&' character. Split the dnode_reallocate() ASSERT
to make it more readable to clearly separate the checks.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#8606
This partially reverts commit 5dbf8b4ed. This change resolved
the issues observed with truncated files in raw sends. However,
the required changes to dnode_allocate() introduced a regression
for non-raw streams which needs to be understood.
The additional debugging improvements from the original patch
were not reverted.
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #7378
Issue #8528
Issue #8540
Issue #8565Close#8584
This patch fixes a few issues with raw receives involving
truncated files:
* dnode_reallocate() now calls dnode_set_blksz() instead of
dnode_setdblksz(). This ensures that any remaining dbufs with
blkid 0 are resized along with their containing dnode upon
reallocation.
* One of the calls to dmu_free_long_range() in receive_object()
needs to check that the object it is about to free some contents
or hasn't been completely removed already by a previous call to
dmu_free_long_object() in the same function.
* The same call to dmu_free_long_range() in the previous point
needs to ensure it uses the object's current block size and
not the new block size. This ensures the blocks of the object
that are supposed to be freed are completely removed and not
simply partially zeroed out.
This patch also adds handling for DRR_OBJECT_RANGE records to
dprintf_drr() for debugging purposes.
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes#7378Closes#8528
Currently, there is an issue in the raw receive code where
raw receives are allowed to happen on top of previously
non-raw received datasets. This is a problem because the
source-side dataset doesn't know about how the blocks on
the destination were encrypted. As a result, any MAC in
the objset's checksum-of-MACs tree that is a parent of both
blocks encrypted on the source and blocks encrypted by the
destination will be incorrect. This will result in
authentication errors when we decrypt the dataset.
This patch fixes this issue by adding a new check to the
raw receive code. The code now maintains an "IVset guid",
which acts as an identifier for the set of IVs used to
encrypt a given snapshot. When a snapshot is raw received,
the destination snapshot will take this value from the
DRR_BEGIN payload. Non-raw receives and normal "zfs snap"
operations will cause ZFS to generate a new IVset guid.
When a raw incremental stream is received, ZFS will check
that the "from" IVset guid in the stream matches that of
the "from" destination snapshot. If they do not match, the
code will error out the receive, preventing the problem.
This patch requires an on-disk format change to add the
IVset guids to snapshots and bookmarks. As a result, this
patch has errata handling and a tunable to help affected
users resolve the issue with as little interruption as
possible.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes#8308
Currently, the receive code can create an unreadable dataset from
a correct raw send stream. This is because it is currently
impossible to set maxblkid to a lower value without freeing the
associated object. This means truncating files on the send side
to a non-0 size could result in corruption. This patch solves this
issue by adding a new 'force' flag to dnode_new_blkid() which will
allow the raw receive code to force the DMU to accept the provided
maxblkid even if it is a lower value than the existing one.
For testing purposes the send_encrypted_files.ksh test has been
extended to include a variety of truncated files and multiple
snapshots. It also now leverages the xattrtest command to help
ensure raw receives correctly handle xattrs.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes#8168Closes#8487
zfs create, receive and rename can bypass this hierarchy rule. Update
both userland and kernel module to prevent this issue and use pyzfs
unit tests to exercise the ioctls directly.
Note: this commit slightly changes zfs_ioc_create() ABI. This allow to
differentiate a generic error (EINVAL) from the specific case where we
tried to create a dataset below a ZVOL (ZFS_ERR_WRONG_PARENT).
Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
Currently, when a DRR_OBJECT record is read into memory in
receive_read_record(), memory is allocated for the bonus buffer.
However, if the object doesn't have a bonus buffer the code will
still "allocate" the zero bytes, but the memory will not be passed
to the processing thread for cleanup later. This causes the spl
kmem tracking code to report a leak. This patch simply changes the
code so that it only allocates this memory if it has a non-zero
length.
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes#8266
Currently, the functions dbuf_prefetch_indirect_done() and
dmu_assign_arcbuf_by_dnode() assume that dbuf_hold_level() cannot
fail. In the event of an error the former will cause a NULL pointer
dereference and the later will trigger a VERIFY. This patch adds
error handling to these functions and their callers where necessary.
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes#8291
Object allocation performance can be improved for complex operations
by providing an interface which returns the newly allocated dnode.
This allows the caller to immediately use the dnode without incurring
the expense of looking up the dnode by object number.
The functions dmu_object_alloc_hold(), zap_create_hold(), and
dmu_bonus_hold_by_dnode() were added for this purpose.
The zap_create_* functions have been updated to take advantage of
this new functionality. The dmu_bonus_hold_impl() function should
really have never been included in sys/dmu.h and was removed.
It's sole caller was converted to use dmu_bonus_hold_by_dnode().
The new symbols have been exported for use by Lustre.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#8015
This change moves the bottom half of dmu_send.c (where the receive
logic is kept) into a new file, dmu_recv.c, and does similarly
for receive-related changes in header files.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Closes#7982
