pve-kernel-qoup/patches/kernel/0227-bpf-fix-incorrect-sign-extension-in-check_alu_op.patch
Fabian Grünbichler 321d628a98 add KPTI and related patches
picked from Ubuntu-4.13.0-23.26
2018-01-06 15:15:39 +01:00

70 lines
2.4 KiB
Diff

From 652c6cabaf30e4c75f7dc2c42a33a8f066d7df2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 08:01:22 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 227/231] bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in check_alu_op()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
[ Upstream commit 95a762e2c8c942780948091f8f2a4f32fce1ac6f ]
Distinguish between
BPF_ALU64|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, sign-extended to 64-bit)
and BPF_ALU|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, zero-padded to 64-bit);
only perform sign extension in the first case.
Starting with v4.14, this is exploitable by unprivileged users as long as
the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl isn't set.
Debian assigned CVE-2017-16995 for this issue.
v3:
- add CVE number (Ben Hutchings)
Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
CVE-2017-16995
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
(cherry picked from commit 868c88129c7567525dbde3cb6989a5acd478bd80)
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4321625fe32a..cdfa07a4ef27 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2048,12 +2048,19 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
/* case: R = imm
* remember the value we stored into this reg
*/
+ u64 imm;
+
+ if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
+ imm = insn->imm;
+ else
+ imm = (u32)insn->imm;
+
regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm;
+ regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = imm;
regs[insn->dst_reg].id = 0;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = insn->imm;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = insn->imm;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].min_align = calc_align(insn->imm);
+ regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = imm;
+ regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = imm;
+ regs[insn->dst_reg].min_align = calc_align(imm);
regs[insn->dst_reg].value_from_signed = false;
}
--
2.14.2