From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ojaswin Mujoo Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:49:50 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fallback to complex scan if aligned scan doesn't work Currently in case the goal length is a multiple of stripe size we use ext4_mb_scan_aligned() to find the stripe size aligned physical blocks. In case we are not able to find any, we again go back to calling ext4_mb_choose_next_group() to search for a different suitable block group. However, since the linear search always begins from the start, most of the times we end up with the same BG and the cycle continues. With large fliesystems, the CPU can be stuck in this loop for hours which can slow down the whole system. Hence, until we figure out a better way to continue the search (rather than starting from beginning) in ext4_mb_choose_next_group(), lets just fallback to ext4_mb_complex_scan_group() in case aligned scan fails, as it is much more likely to find the needed blocks. Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 5246b408cf0c..e3b942664842 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -2894,14 +2894,19 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac) ac->ac_groups_scanned++; if (cr == CR_POWER2_ALIGNED) ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(ac, &e4b); - else if ((cr == CR_GOAL_LEN_FAST || - cr == CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN) && - sbi->s_stripe && - !(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % - EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_stripe))) - ext4_mb_scan_aligned(ac, &e4b); - else - ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(ac, &e4b); + else { + bool is_stripe_aligned = sbi->s_stripe && + !(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % + EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_stripe)); + + if ((cr == CR_GOAL_LEN_FAST || + cr == CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN) && + is_stripe_aligned) + ext4_mb_scan_aligned(ac, &e4b); + + if (ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_CONTINUE) + ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(ac, &e4b); + } ext4_unlock_group(sb, group); ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);