Rich Ercolani b657f2c592 Corrected oversight in ZERO_RANGE behavior ... It turns out, no, in fact, ZERO_RANGE and PUNCH_HOLE do have differing semantics in some ways - in particular, one requires KEEP_SIZE, and the other does not. Also added a zero-range test to catch this, corrected a flaw that made the punch-hole test succeed vacuously, and a typo in file_write. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com> Closes #13329 Closes #13338		2022-04-20 16:07:03 -07:00
..
common.run	tests: move C test helpers into test cmd	2022-04-01 18:01:39 -07:00
freebsd.run	Expose additional file level attributes	2022-03-07 17:52:03 -08:00
linux.run	Corrected oversight in ZERO_RANGE behavior	2022-04-20 16:07:03 -07:00
longevity.run	OpenZFS 9166 - zfs storage pool checkpoint	2018-06-26 10:07:42 -07:00
Makefile.am	Add sanity.run file	2020-12-03 10:49:39 -08:00
perf-regression.run	OpenZFS 9184 - Add ZFS performance test for fixed blocksize random read/write IO	2018-07-02 13:46:06 -07:00
sanity.run	tests: move C test helpers into test cmd	2022-04-01 18:01:39 -07:00
sunos.run	ZTS: Add a failsafe callback to run after each test	2020-03-10 11:00:56 -07:00