mirror_zfs/module/zfs/rrwlock.c
Tim Schumacher b884768e46 Prefix all refcount functions with zfs_
Recent changes in the Linux kernel made it necessary to prefix
the refcount_add() function with zfs_ due to a name collision.

To bring the other functions in line with that and to avoid future
collisions, prefix the other refcount functions as well.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tim Schumacher <timschumi@gmx.de>
Closes #7963
2018-11-08 14:38:28 -08:00

397 lines
11 KiB
C

/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License (the "License").
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
*
* You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
* or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions
* and limitations under the License.
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
* If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
* fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying
* information: Portions Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
/*
* Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Use is subject to license terms.
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2012 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
*/
#include <sys/refcount.h>
#include <sys/rrwlock.h>
/*
* This file contains the implementation of a re-entrant read
* reader/writer lock (aka "rrwlock").
*
* This is a normal reader/writer lock with the additional feature
* of allowing threads who have already obtained a read lock to
* re-enter another read lock (re-entrant read) - even if there are
* waiting writers.
*
* Callers who have not obtained a read lock give waiting writers priority.
*
* The rrwlock_t lock does not allow re-entrant writers, nor does it
* allow a re-entrant mix of reads and writes (that is, it does not
* allow a caller who has already obtained a read lock to be able to
* then grab a write lock without first dropping all read locks, and
* vice versa).
*
* The rrwlock_t uses tsd (thread specific data) to keep a list of
* nodes (rrw_node_t), where each node keeps track of which specific
* lock (rrw_node_t::rn_rrl) the thread has grabbed. Since re-entering
* should be rare, a thread that grabs multiple reads on the same rrwlock_t
* will store multiple rrw_node_ts of the same 'rrn_rrl'. Nodes on the
* tsd list can represent a different rrwlock_t. This allows a thread
* to enter multiple and unique rrwlock_ts for read locks at the same time.
*
* Since using tsd exposes some overhead, the rrwlock_t only needs to
* keep tsd data when writers are waiting. If no writers are waiting, then
* a reader just bumps the anonymous read count (rr_anon_rcount) - no tsd
* is needed. Once a writer attempts to grab the lock, readers then
* keep tsd data and bump the linked readers count (rr_linked_rcount).
*
* If there are waiting writers and there are anonymous readers, then a
* reader doesn't know if it is a re-entrant lock. But since it may be one,
* we allow the read to proceed (otherwise it could deadlock). Since once
* waiting writers are active, readers no longer bump the anonymous count,
* the anonymous readers will eventually flush themselves out. At this point,
* readers will be able to tell if they are a re-entrant lock (have a
* rrw_node_t entry for the lock) or not. If they are a re-entrant lock, then
* we must let the proceed. If they are not, then the reader blocks for the
* waiting writers. Hence, we do not starve writers.
*/
/* global key for TSD */
uint_t rrw_tsd_key;
typedef struct rrw_node {
struct rrw_node *rn_next;
rrwlock_t *rn_rrl;
void *rn_tag;
} rrw_node_t;
static rrw_node_t *
rrn_find(rrwlock_t *rrl)
{
rrw_node_t *rn;
if (zfs_refcount_count(&rrl->rr_linked_rcount) == 0)
return (NULL);
for (rn = tsd_get(rrw_tsd_key); rn != NULL; rn = rn->rn_next) {
if (rn->rn_rrl == rrl)
return (rn);
}
return (NULL);
}
/*
* Add a node to the head of the singly linked list.
*/
static void
rrn_add(rrwlock_t *rrl, void *tag)
{
rrw_node_t *rn;
rn = kmem_alloc(sizeof (*rn), KM_SLEEP);
rn->rn_rrl = rrl;
rn->rn_next = tsd_get(rrw_tsd_key);
rn->rn_tag = tag;
VERIFY(tsd_set(rrw_tsd_key, rn) == 0);
}
/*
* If a node is found for 'rrl', then remove the node from this
* thread's list and return TRUE; otherwise return FALSE.
*/
static boolean_t
rrn_find_and_remove(rrwlock_t *rrl, void *tag)
{
rrw_node_t *rn;
rrw_node_t *prev = NULL;
if (zfs_refcount_count(&rrl->rr_linked_rcount) == 0)
return (B_FALSE);
for (rn = tsd_get(rrw_tsd_key); rn != NULL; rn = rn->rn_next) {
if (rn->rn_rrl == rrl && rn->rn_tag == tag) {
if (prev)
prev->rn_next = rn->rn_next;
else
VERIFY(tsd_set(rrw_tsd_key, rn->rn_next) == 0);
kmem_free(rn, sizeof (*rn));
return (B_TRUE);
}
prev = rn;
}
return (B_FALSE);
}
void
rrw_init(rrwlock_t *rrl, boolean_t track_all)
{
mutex_init(&rrl->rr_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
cv_init(&rrl->rr_cv, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
rrl->rr_writer = NULL;
zfs_refcount_create(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount);
zfs_refcount_create(&rrl->rr_linked_rcount);
rrl->rr_writer_wanted = B_FALSE;
rrl->rr_track_all = track_all;
}
void
rrw_destroy(rrwlock_t *rrl)
{
mutex_destroy(&rrl->rr_lock);
cv_destroy(&rrl->rr_cv);
ASSERT(rrl->rr_writer == NULL);
zfs_refcount_destroy(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount);
zfs_refcount_destroy(&rrl->rr_linked_rcount);
}
static void
rrw_enter_read_impl(rrwlock_t *rrl, boolean_t prio, void *tag)
{
mutex_enter(&rrl->rr_lock);
#if !defined(DEBUG) && defined(_KERNEL)
if (rrl->rr_writer == NULL && !rrl->rr_writer_wanted &&
!rrl->rr_track_all) {
rrl->rr_anon_rcount.rc_count++;
mutex_exit(&rrl->rr_lock);
return;
}
DTRACE_PROBE(zfs__rrwfastpath__rdmiss);
#endif
ASSERT(rrl->rr_writer != curthread);
ASSERT(zfs_refcount_count(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount) >= 0);
while (rrl->rr_writer != NULL || (rrl->rr_writer_wanted &&
zfs_refcount_is_zero(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount) && !prio &&
rrn_find(rrl) == NULL))
cv_wait(&rrl->rr_cv, &rrl->rr_lock);
if (rrl->rr_writer_wanted || rrl->rr_track_all) {
/* may or may not be a re-entrant enter */
rrn_add(rrl, tag);
(void) zfs_refcount_add(&rrl->rr_linked_rcount, tag);
} else {
(void) zfs_refcount_add(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount, tag);
}
ASSERT(rrl->rr_writer == NULL);
mutex_exit(&rrl->rr_lock);
}
void
rrw_enter_read(rrwlock_t *rrl, void *tag)
{
rrw_enter_read_impl(rrl, B_FALSE, tag);
}
/*
* take a read lock even if there are pending write lock requests. if we want
* to take a lock reentrantly, but from different threads (that have a
* relationship to each other), the normal detection mechanism to overrule
* the pending writer does not work, so we have to give an explicit hint here.
*/
void
rrw_enter_read_prio(rrwlock_t *rrl, void *tag)
{
rrw_enter_read_impl(rrl, B_TRUE, tag);
}
void
rrw_enter_write(rrwlock_t *rrl)
{
mutex_enter(&rrl->rr_lock);
ASSERT(rrl->rr_writer != curthread);
while (zfs_refcount_count(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount) > 0 ||
zfs_refcount_count(&rrl->rr_linked_rcount) > 0 ||
rrl->rr_writer != NULL) {
rrl->rr_writer_wanted = B_TRUE;
cv_wait(&rrl->rr_cv, &rrl->rr_lock);
}
rrl->rr_writer_wanted = B_FALSE;
rrl->rr_writer = curthread;
mutex_exit(&rrl->rr_lock);
}
void
rrw_enter(rrwlock_t *rrl, krw_t rw, void *tag)
{
if (rw == RW_READER)
rrw_enter_read(rrl, tag);
else
rrw_enter_write(rrl);
}
void
rrw_exit(rrwlock_t *rrl, void *tag)
{
mutex_enter(&rrl->rr_lock);
#if !defined(DEBUG) && defined(_KERNEL)
if (!rrl->rr_writer && rrl->rr_linked_rcount.rc_count == 0) {
rrl->rr_anon_rcount.rc_count--;
if (rrl->rr_anon_rcount.rc_count == 0)
cv_broadcast(&rrl->rr_cv);
mutex_exit(&rrl->rr_lock);
return;
}
DTRACE_PROBE(zfs__rrwfastpath__exitmiss);
#endif
ASSERT(!zfs_refcount_is_zero(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount) ||
!zfs_refcount_is_zero(&rrl->rr_linked_rcount) ||
rrl->rr_writer != NULL);
if (rrl->rr_writer == NULL) {
int64_t count;
if (rrn_find_and_remove(rrl, tag)) {
count = zfs_refcount_remove(
&rrl->rr_linked_rcount, tag);
} else {
ASSERT(!rrl->rr_track_all);
count = zfs_refcount_remove(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount, tag);
}
if (count == 0)
cv_broadcast(&rrl->rr_cv);
} else {
ASSERT(rrl->rr_writer == curthread);
ASSERT(zfs_refcount_is_zero(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount) &&
zfs_refcount_is_zero(&rrl->rr_linked_rcount));
rrl->rr_writer = NULL;
cv_broadcast(&rrl->rr_cv);
}
mutex_exit(&rrl->rr_lock);
}
/*
* If the lock was created with track_all, rrw_held(RW_READER) will return
* B_TRUE iff the current thread has the lock for reader. Otherwise it may
* return B_TRUE if any thread has the lock for reader.
*/
boolean_t
rrw_held(rrwlock_t *rrl, krw_t rw)
{
boolean_t held;
mutex_enter(&rrl->rr_lock);
if (rw == RW_WRITER) {
held = (rrl->rr_writer == curthread);
} else {
held = (!zfs_refcount_is_zero(&rrl->rr_anon_rcount) ||
rrn_find(rrl) != NULL);
}
mutex_exit(&rrl->rr_lock);
return (held);
}
void
rrw_tsd_destroy(void *arg)
{
rrw_node_t *rn = arg;
if (rn != NULL) {
panic("thread %p terminating with rrw lock %p held",
(void *)curthread, (void *)rn->rn_rrl);
}
}
/*
* A reader-mostly lock implementation, tuning above reader-writer locks
* for hightly parallel read acquisitions, while pessimizing writes.
*
* The idea is to split single busy lock into array of locks, so that
* each reader can lock only one of them for read, depending on result
* of simple hash function. That proportionally reduces lock congestion.
* Writer at the same time has to sequentially acquire write on all the locks.
* That makes write acquisition proportionally slower, but in places where
* it is used (filesystem unmount) performance is not critical.
*
* All the functions below are direct wrappers around functions above.
*/
void
rrm_init(rrmlock_t *rrl, boolean_t track_all)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < RRM_NUM_LOCKS; i++)
rrw_init(&rrl->locks[i], track_all);
}
void
rrm_destroy(rrmlock_t *rrl)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < RRM_NUM_LOCKS; i++)
rrw_destroy(&rrl->locks[i]);
}
void
rrm_enter(rrmlock_t *rrl, krw_t rw, void *tag)
{
if (rw == RW_READER)
rrm_enter_read(rrl, tag);
else
rrm_enter_write(rrl);
}
/*
* This maps the current thread to a specific lock. Note that the lock
* must be released by the same thread that acquired it. We do this
* mapping by taking the thread pointer mod a prime number. We examine
* only the low 32 bits of the thread pointer, because 32-bit division
* is faster than 64-bit division, and the high 32 bits have little
* entropy anyway.
*/
#define RRM_TD_LOCK() (((uint32_t)(uintptr_t)(curthread)) % RRM_NUM_LOCKS)
void
rrm_enter_read(rrmlock_t *rrl, void *tag)
{
rrw_enter_read(&rrl->locks[RRM_TD_LOCK()], tag);
}
void
rrm_enter_write(rrmlock_t *rrl)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < RRM_NUM_LOCKS; i++)
rrw_enter_write(&rrl->locks[i]);
}
void
rrm_exit(rrmlock_t *rrl, void *tag)
{
int i;
if (rrl->locks[0].rr_writer == curthread) {
for (i = 0; i < RRM_NUM_LOCKS; i++)
rrw_exit(&rrl->locks[i], tag);
} else {
rrw_exit(&rrl->locks[RRM_TD_LOCK()], tag);
}
}
boolean_t
rrm_held(rrmlock_t *rrl, krw_t rw)
{
if (rw == RW_WRITER) {
return (rrw_held(&rrl->locks[0], rw));
} else {
return (rrw_held(&rrl->locks[RRM_TD_LOCK()], rw));
}
}