mirror_zfs/modules/spl/spl-taskq.c
behlendo 6e605b6e58 Minor improvement to taskq handling. This is a small step towards
dynamic taskqs which still need to be fully implemented.


git-svn-id: https://outreach.scidac.gov/svn/spl/trunk@87 7e1ea52c-4ff2-0310-8f11-9dd32ca42a1c
2008-04-23 21:19:47 +00:00

115 lines
2.9 KiB
C

#include <sys/taskq.h>
#ifdef DEBUG_SUBSYSTEM
#undef DEBUG_SUBSYSTEM
#endif
#define DEBUG_SUBSYSTEM S_TASKQ
/*
* Task queue interface
*
* The taskq_work_wrapper functions are used to manage the work_structs
* which must be submitted to linux. The shim layer allocates a wrapper
* structure for all items which contains a pointer to itself as well as
* the real work to be performed. When the work item run the generic
* handle is called which calls the real work function and then using
* the self pointer frees the work_struct.
*/
typedef struct taskq_work_wrapper {
struct work_struct tww_work;
task_func_t tww_func;
void * tww_priv;
} taskq_work_wrapper_t;
static void
taskq_work_handler(void *priv)
{
taskq_work_wrapper_t *tww = priv;
ASSERT(tww);
ASSERT(tww->tww_func);
/* Call the real function and free the wrapper */
tww->tww_func(tww->tww_priv);
kfree(tww);
}
/* XXX - All flags currently ignored */
taskqid_t
__taskq_dispatch(taskq_t *tq, task_func_t func, void *priv, uint_t flags)
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq = tq;
taskq_work_wrapper_t *tww;
int rc;
ENTRY;
ASSERT(tq);
ASSERT(func);
/* Use GFP_ATOMIC since this may be called in interrupt context */
tww = (taskq_work_wrapper_t *)kmalloc(sizeof(*tww), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!tww)
RETURN((taskqid_t)0);
INIT_WORK(&(tww->tww_work), taskq_work_handler, tww);
tww->tww_func = func;
tww->tww_priv = priv;
rc = queue_work(wq, &(tww->tww_work));
if (!rc) {
kfree(tww);
RETURN((taskqid_t)0);
}
RETURN((taskqid_t)wq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__taskq_dispatch);
/* XXX - We must fully implement dynamic workqueues since they make a
* significant impact in terms of performance. For now I've made
* a trivial compromise. If you ask for one thread you get one
* thread, if you ask for more than that you get one per core.
* It's unclear if you ever really need/want more than one per-core
* anyway. More analysis is required.
*
* name - Workqueue names are limited to 10 chars
* pri - Ignore priority
* min - Ignored until this is a dynamic thread pool
* max - Ignored until this is a dynamic thread pool
* flags - Ignored until this is a dynamic thread_pool
*/
taskq_t *
__taskq_create(const char *name, int nthreads, pri_t pri,
int minalloc, int maxalloc, uint_t flags)
{
taskq_t *tq;
ENTRY;
if (nthreads == 1)
tq = create_singlethread_workqueue(name);
else
tq = create_workqueue(name);
return tq;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__taskq_create);
void
__taskq_destroy(taskq_t *tq)
{
ENTRY;
destroy_workqueue(tq);
EXIT;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__taskq_destroy);
void
__taskq_wait(taskq_t *tq)
{
ENTRY;
flush_workqueue(tq);
EXIT;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__taskq_wait);