Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Dagnelie
30af21b025 Implement Redacted Send/Receive
Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to 
a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not 
transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or 
analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating 
unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools 
like zrepl.

Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or 
clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this 
clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or
modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction 
snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used 
to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the 
list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction 
snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter 
to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the
redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive 
or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send 
stream.  When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it 
contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those 
blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the 
creation_txg of the redaction bookmark.  This step is necessary to 
allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are 
accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot.

The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve 
adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the 
life cycles of these deadlists.

The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously 
an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send 
is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime 
significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate.

Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Closes #7958
2019-06-19 09:48:12 -07:00
Tom Caputi
f00ab3f22c Detect and prevent mixed raw and non-raw sends
Currently, there is an issue in the raw receive code where
raw receives are allowed to happen on top of previously
non-raw received datasets. This is a problem because the
source-side dataset doesn't know about how the blocks on
the destination were encrypted. As a result, any MAC in
the objset's checksum-of-MACs tree that is a parent of both
blocks encrypted on the source and blocks encrypted by the
destination will be incorrect. This will result in
authentication errors when we decrypt the dataset.

This patch fixes this issue by adding a new check to the
raw receive code. The code now maintains an "IVset guid",
which acts as an identifier for the set of IVs used to
encrypt a given snapshot. When a snapshot is raw received,
the destination snapshot will take this value from the
DRR_BEGIN payload. Non-raw receives and normal "zfs snap"
operations will cause ZFS to generate a new IVset guid.
When a raw incremental stream is received, ZFS will check
that the "from" IVset guid in the stream matches that of
the "from" destination snapshot. If they do not match, the
code will error out the receive, preventing the problem.

This patch requires an on-disk format change to add the
IVset guids to snapshots and bookmarks. As a result, this
patch has errata handling and a tunable to help affected
users resolve the issue with as little interruption as
possible.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Closes #8308
2019-03-13 11:00:43 -07:00
Tom Caputi
579ce7c5ae Add bookmark v2 on-disk feature
This patch adds the bookmark v2 feature to the on-disk format. This
feature will be needed for the upcoming redacted sends and for an
upcoming fix that for raw receives. The feature is not currently
used by any code and thus this change is a no-op, aside from the
fact that the user can now enable the feature.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Issue #8308
2019-03-13 10:58:39 -07:00
Don Brady
1c27024e22 Undo c89 workarounds to match with upstream
With PR 5756 the zfs module now supports c99 and the
remaining past c89 workarounds can be undone.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com>
Closes #6816
2017-11-04 13:25:13 -07:00
Matthew Ahrens
c6f6767eea OpenZFS 8377 - Panic in bookmark deletion
Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Ported-by: Giuseppe Di Natale <dinatale2@llnl.gov>

The problem is that when dsl_bookmark_destroy_check() is
executed from open context (the pre-check), it fills in
dbda_success based on the existence of the bookmark. But
the bookmark (or containing filesystem as in this case)
can be destroyed before we get to syncing context. When
we re-run dsl_bookmark_destroy_check() in syncing context,
it will not add the deleted bookmark to dbda_success,
intending for dsl_bookmark_destroy_sync() to not process
it. But because the bookmark is still in dbda_success from
the open-context call, we do try to destroy it.
The fix is that dsl_bookmark_destroy_check() should not
modify dbda_success when called from open context.

OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8377
OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/b0b6fe3
Closes #6286
2017-06-30 11:11:01 -07:00
George Melikov
9b7b9cd370 OpenZFS 1300 - filename normalization doesn't work for removes
Authored by: Kevin Crowe <kevin.crowe@nexenta.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Ported-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>

OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/1300
OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/8f1750d
Closes #5725 

Porting notes:
- zap_micro.c: all `MT_EXACT` are replaced by `0`
2017-02-02 14:13:41 -08:00
Igor Kozhukhov
eca7b76001 OpenZFS 6314 - buffer overflow in dsl_dataset_name
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <ikozhukhov@gmail.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>

OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/6314
OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/d6160ee
2016-06-28 13:47:03 -07:00
Matthew Ahrens
3d45fdd6c0 Illumos 4951 - ZFS administrative commands should use reserved space
4951 ZFS administrative commands should use reserved space, not with ENOSPC
Reviewed by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org>

References:
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/4373
  https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/7d46dc6

Ported by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2015-05-04 09:41:10 -07:00
Justin T. Gibbs
0c66c32d1d Illumos 5056 - ZFS deadlock on db_mtx and dn_holds
5056 ZFS deadlock on db_mtx and dn_holds
Author: Justin Gibbs <justing@spectralogic.com>
Reviewed by: Will Andrews <willa@spectralogic.com>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>

References:
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/5056
  https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/bc9014e

Porting Notes:

sa_handle_get_from_db():
  - the original patch includes an otherwise unmentioned fix for a
    possible usage of an uninitialised variable

dmu_objset_open_impl():
  - Under Illumos list_link_init() is the same as filling a list_node_t
    with NULLs, so they don't notice if they miss doing list_link_init()
    on a zero'd containing structure (e.g. allocated with kmem_zalloc as
    here). Under Linux, not so much: an uninitialised list_node_t goes
    "Boom!" some time later when it's used or destroyed.

dmu_objset_evict_dbufs():
  - reduce stack usage using kmem_alloc()

Ported-by: Chris Dunlop <chris@onthe.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2015-04-28 16:25:34 -07:00
Justin T. Gibbs
d683ddbb72 Illumos 5314 - Remove "dbuf phys" db->db_data pointer aliases in ZFS
5314 Remove "dbuf phys" db->db_data pointer aliases in ZFS
Author: Justin T. Gibbs <justing@spectralogic.com>
Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Will Andrews <willa@spectralogic.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>

References:
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/5314
  https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/c137962

Ported-by: Chris Dunlop <chris@onthe.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2015-04-28 16:25:20 -07:00
Matthew Ahrens
da536844d5 Illumos 4368, 4369.
4369 implement zfs bookmarks
4368 zfs send filesystems from readonly pools
Reviewed by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org>

References:
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/4369
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/4368
  https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/78f1710

Ported by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #2530
2014-07-29 10:55:29 -07:00