The Linux 5.16.14 kernel's coccicheck caught this. The semantic
patch that caught it was:
./scripts/coccinelle/misc/flexible_array.cocci
However, unlike the cases where the GNU zero length array extension had
been used, coccicheck would not suggest patches for the older style
single member arrays. That was good because blindly changing them would
break size calculations in most cases.
Therefore, this required care to make sure that we did not break size
calculations. In the case of `indirect_split_t`, we use
`offsetof(indirect_split_t, is_child[is->is_children])` to calculate
size. This might be subtly wrong according to an old mailing list
thread:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-prs/20021226123454.27019.qmail@sources.redhat.com/T/
That is because the C99 specification should consider the flexible array
members to start at the end of a structure, but compilers prefer to put
padding at the end. A suggestion was made to allow compilers to allocate
padding after the VLA like compilers already did:
http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n983.htm
However, upon thinking about it, whether or not we allocate end of
structure padding does not matter, so using offsetof() to calculate the
size of the structure is fine, so long as we do not mix it with sizeof()
on structures with no array members.
In the case that we mix them and padding causes offsetof(struct_t,
vla_member[0]) to differ from sizeof(struct_t), we would be doing unsafe
operations if we underallocate via `offsetof()` and then overcopy via
sizeof().
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Closes#14372
ZFS loves using %llu for uint64_t, but that requires a cast to not
be noisy - which is even done in many, though not all, places.
Also a couple places used %u for uint64_t, which were promoted
to %llu.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Closes#12233
I looked for a bit, and couldn't find any documentation on
how to print all logged dbgmsg entries, just messages since
the DTrace probe started, until @allanjude kindly pointed me
toward the sysctl.
So let's add that note where the DTrace probe is mentioned for
FreeBSD, so other people can find it.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Allan Jude <allan@klarasystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Closes#12113
Change some comments copied from the Linux code to describe
the appropriate methods on FreeBSD.
Convert some tunables to ZFS_MODULE_PARAM so they get created
on FreeBSD.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Closes#10647
Add the FreeBSD platform code to the OpenZFS repository. As of this
commit the source can be compiled and tested on FreeBSD 11 and 12.
Subsequent commits are now required to compile on FreeBSD and Linux.
Additionally, they must pass the ZFS Test Suite on FreeBSD which is
being run by the CI. As of this commit 1230 tests pass on FreeBSD
and there are no unexpected failures.
Reviewed-by: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Closes#898Closes#8987
