Provides the missing full barrier variant to the membar primitive set.
While not used right now, this is probably going to change down the
road.
Name taken from Solaris, to follow the existing routines.
Reviewed-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Closes#13907
69 CSTYLED BEGINs remain, appx. 30 of which can be removed if cstyle(1)
had a useful policy regarding
CALL(ARG1,
ARG2,
ARG3);
above 2 lines. As it stands, it spits out *both*
sysctl_os.c: 385: continuation line should be indented by 4 spaces
sysctl_os.c: 385: indent by spaces instead of tabs
which is very cool
Another >10 could be fixed by removing "ulong" &al. handling.
I don't foresee anyone actually using it intentionally
(does it even exist in modern headers? why did it in the first place?).
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Closes#12993
- Avoid atomic_add() when updating as_lower_bound/as_upper_bound.
Previous code was excessively strong on 64bit systems while not
strong enough on 32bit ones. Instead introduce and use real
atomic_load() and atomic_store() operations, just an assignments
on 64bit machines, but using proper atomics on 32bit ones to avoid
torn reads/writes.
- Reduce number of buckets on large systems. Extra buckets not as
much improve add speed, as hurt reads. Unlike wmsum for aggsum
reads are still important.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored-By: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#12145
This replaces the generic libspl atomic.c atomics implementation
with one based on builtin gcc atomics. This functionality was added
as an experimental feature in gcc 4.4. Today even CentOS 7 ships
with gcc 4.8 as the default compiler we can make this the default.
Furthermore, the builtin atomics are as good or better than our
hand-rolled implementation so it's reasonable to drop that custom code.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Closes#11904
