3742 zfs comments need cleaner, more consistent style
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Eric Schrock <eric.schrock@delphix.com>
Approved by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com>
References:
https://www.illumos.org/issues/3742illumos/illumos-gate@f717074149
Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #1775
Porting notes:
1. The change to zfs_vfsops.c was dropped because it involves
zfs_mount_label_policy, which does not exist in the Linux port.
3006 VERIFY[S,U,P] and ASSERT[S,U,P] frequently check if first
argument is zero
Reviewed by Matt Ahrens <matthew.ahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by Eric Schrock <eric.schrock@delphix.com>
References:
illumos/illumos-gate@fb09f5aad4https://illumos.org/issues/3006
Requires:
zfsonlinux/spl@1c6d149feb
Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#1509
2619 asynchronous destruction of ZFS file systems
2747 SPA versioning with zfs feature flags
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Reviewed by: Dan Kruchinin <dan.kruchinin@gmail.com>
Approved by: Eric Schrock <Eric.Schrock@delphix.com>
References:
illumos/illumos-gate@53089ab7c8illumos/illumos-gate@ad135b5d64
illumos changeset: 13700:2889e2596bd6
https://www.illumos.org/issues/2619https://www.illumos.org/issues/2747
NOTE: The grub specific changes were not ported. This change
must be made to the Linux grub packages.
Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
In a debug build, certain GCC versions flag an array bounds warning in
the below code from dnode_sync.c
} else {
int i;
ASSERT(dn->dn_next_nblkptr[txgoff] < dnp->dn_nblkptr);
/* the blkptrs we are losing better be unallocated */
for (i = dn->dn_next_nblkptr[txgoff];
i < dnp->dn_nblkptr; i++)
ASSERT(BP_IS_HOLE(&dnp->dn_blkptr[i]));
This usage is in fact safe, since the ASSERT ensures the index does
not exceed to maximum possible number of block pointers. However gcc
can't determine that the assignment 'i = dn->dn_next_nblkptr[txgoff];'
falls within the array bounds so it issues a warning. To avoid this,
initialize i to zero to make gcc happy but skip the elements before
dn->dn_next_nblkptr[txgoff] in the loop body. Since a dnode contains
at most 3 block pointers this overhead should be negligible.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#950
Replace non-fatal assertion with warning. This was being observed
during testing and it should not be fatal.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
