This is a follow up commit for e03a41a60 which aimed to resolve
this same test failure. The core "problem" here is that it takes
very little space to perform a clone/snapshot/bookmark, which
means if we want these commands to reliably fail the pool must
truely have exhausted all free space.
This commit increases the number of fill iterations to try and
consume every block which we can. This still can't guarantee
the clone/snapshot/bookmark will fail, but it significantly
improves the odds. The exception was kept since it's still
not a sure thing.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#12903
On FreeBSD vnode reclamation is single-threaded, protected by single
global lock. Linux seems to be able to use a thread per mount point,
but at this time it creates more harm than good.
Reduce number of threads to 1, adding tunable in case somebody wants
to try more.
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Chris Dunlop <chris@onthe.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#12896
Issue #9966
Under Linux when rolling back a mounted filesystem negative dentries
may not be dropped from the cache. This can result in an ENOENT
being incorrectly returned on first access. Issuing a `df` before
the unmount results in the negative dentries being invalidated and
side steps the issue.
This is solely a workaround for the test case on Linux and not
correct behavior. The core issue of invalidating negative dentries
needs to be handled with a kernel side change. This is being
tracked as issue #6143.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#12898
Issue #6143
The rerefreserv_raidz test was failing on Linux because the sync being
issued doesn't guarantee a pool sync. Switch to using the sync_pool
function and remove the ZTS exception for Linux.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#12897
The build on musl needs linux/fs.h for SEEK_DATA and friends,
and sys/sysmacros.h for P2ROUNDUP. Add the needed headers.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org>
Closes#12891
Bullseye shellcheck picks these up as SC2140, and it's right!
@LIBFETCH_SONAME@ is already quoted, so dracut had
"$d/"libcurl.so.4""
and i-t had
""libcurl.so.4""
Partially reverts 34eef3e9a7 (#12760),
which broke this
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Closes#12835
With some minor tweaks several of rsend tests can be sped up
considerably without significantly reducing test coverage.
* send-c_verify_ratio: ~120s -> ~60s
* send_realloc_*_files: ~330s -> ~65s
For the send_realloc* tests this also has the advantage of removing
(most of) the linux/freebsd conditional logic. Note that for this
test more passes, and thus more incremental send/recvs, are preferable
to a larger number of files.
Total run time of the rsend test group was reduced from roughly 20 to
11 minutes in an environment similar to what's used by the CI.
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <tony.nguyen@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#12876
The rsend_007_pos test reliably fails on Linux in the cleanup
function. This is caused by an unmount error when attempting to
recursively destroy the newly received datasets. Invoking `df`
prior to the `zfs destroy` interestingly avoids the unmont error.
Why this should matter is unclear and should be investigated.
However, this minor tweak may allow us to remove the ZTS rsend
exceptions. The subsequent rsend_010_pos and rsend_011_pos
failures were a result of this initial failure. The other
"maybe" failures I was unable to reproduce and have not been
recently observed in the master branch.
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <tony.nguyen@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#5665Closes#6086Closes#6087Closes#6446Closes#12876
