After addressing coverity complaints involving `nvpair_name()`, the
compiler started complaining about dropping const. This lead to a rabbit
hole where not only `nvpair_name()` needed to be constified, but also
`nvpair_value_string()`, `fnvpair_value_string()` and a few other static
functions, plus variable pointers throughout the code. The result became
a fairly big change, so it has been split out into its own patch.
Reviewed-by: Tino Reichardt <milky-zfs@mcmilk.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Closes#14612
Clang's static analyzer reports a possible NULL pointer dereference in
abd_get_size() when called from vdev_draid_map_alloc_write() called from
vdev_draid_map_alloc_row() and vdc->vdc_nparity == 0. This should be
impossible, so we add an assertion to silence the defect report.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Closes#14575
Coverity reported this as an out-of-bounds read.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Closes#13865
When iterating through children physical ashifts for vdev, prefer
ones above the maximum logical ashift, that we can actually use,
but within the administrator defined maximum.
When selecting top-level vdev ashift, do not set it to the defined
maximum in case physical ashift is even higher, but just ignore one.
Using the maximum does not prevent misaligned writes, but reduces
space efficiency. Since ZFS tries to write data sequentially and
aggregates the writes, in many cases large misanigned writes may be
not as bad as the space penalty otherwise.
Allow internal physical ashifts for vdevs higher than SHIFT_MAX.
May be one day allocator or aggregation could benefit from that.
Reduce zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift default from 16 (64KB) to 14 (16KB),
so that ZFS may still use bigger ashifts up to SHIFT_MAX (64KB),
but only if it really has to or explicitly told to, but not as an
"optimization".
There are some read-intensive NVMe SSDs that report Preferred Write
Alignment of 64KB, and attempt to build RAIDZ2 of those leads to a
space inefficiency that can't be justified. Instead these changes
make ZFS fall back to logical ashift of 12 (4KB) by default and
only warn user that it may be suboptimal for performance.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#13798
bcopy() has a confusing argument order and is actually a move, not a
copy; they're all deprecated since POSIX.1-2001 and removed in -2008,
and we shim them out to mem*() on Linux anyway
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Closes#12996
Verify that all empty sectors are zero filled before using them to
calculate parity. Failure to do so can result in incorrect parity
columns being generated and written to disk if the contents of an
empty sector are non-zero. This was possible because the checksum
only protects the data portions of the buffer, not the empty sector
padding.
This issue has been addressed by updating raidz_parity_verify() to
check that all dRAID empty sectors are zero filled. Any sectors
which are non-zero will be fixed, repair IO issued, and a checksum
error logged. They can then be safely used to verify the parity.
This specific type of damage is unlikely to occur since it requires
a disk to have silently returned bad data, for an empty sector, while
performing a scrub. However, if a pool were to have been damaged
in this way, scrubbing the pool with this change applied will repair
both the empty sector and parity columns as long as the data checksum
is valid. Checksum errors will be reported in the `zpool status`
output for any repairs which are made.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#12857
Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <tony.nguyen@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Closes#12728
vdev_draid_min_asize() returns the minimum size of a child vdev. This
is used when determining if a disk is big enough to replace a child.
It's also used by zdb to determine how big of a child to make to test
replacement.
vdev_draid_min_asize() says that the child’s asize has to be at least
1/Nth of the entire draid’s asize, which is the same logic as raidz.
However, this contradicts the code in vdev_draid_open(), which
calculates the draid’s asize based on a reduced child size:
An additional 32MB of scratch space is reserved at the end of each
child for use by the dRAID expansion feature
So the problem is that you can replace a draid disk with one that’s
vdev_draid_min_asize(), but it actually needs to be larger to accommodate
the additional 32MB. The replacement is allowed and everything works at
first (since the reserved space is at the end, and we don’t try to use
it yet), but when you try to close and reopen the pool,
vdev_draid_open() calculates a smaller asize for the draid, because of
the smaller leaf, which is not allowed.
I think the confusion is that vdev_draid_min_asize() is correctly
returning the amount of required *allocatable* space in a leaf, but the
actual *size* of the leaf needs to be at least 32MB more than that.
ztest_vdev_attach_detach() assumes that it can attach that size of
device, and it actually can (the kernel/libzpool accepts it), but it
then later causes zdb to not be able to open the pool.
This commit changes vdev_draid_min_asize() to return the required size
of the leaf, not the size that draid will make available to the metaslab
allocator.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Closes#11459Closes#12221
This change addresses two distinct scenarios which are possible
when performing a sequential resilver to a dRAID pool with vdevs
that contain silent unknown damage. Which in this circumstance
took the form of the devices being intentionally overwritten with
zeros. However, it could also result from a device returning incorrect
data while a sequential resilver was in progress.
Scenario 1) A sequential resilver is performed while all of the
dRAID vdevs are ONLINE and there is silent damage present on the
vdev being resilvered. In this case, nothing will be repaired
by vdev_raidz_io_done_reconstruct_known_missing() because
rc->rc_error isn't set on any of the raid columns. To address
this vdev_draid_io_start_read() has been updated to always mark
the resilvering column as ESTALE for sequential resilver IO.
Scenario 2) Multiple columns contain silent damage for the same
block and a sequential resilver is performed. In this case it's
impossible to generate the correct data from parity unless all of
the damaged columns are being sequentially resilvered (and thus
only good data is used to generate parity). This is as expected
and there's nothing which can be done about it. However, we need
to be careful not to make to situation worse. Since we can't
verify the data is actually good without a checksum, we must
only repair the devices which are being sequentially resilvered.
Otherwise, an incorrect repair to a device which previously
contained good data could effectively lock in the damage and
make reconstruction impossible. A check for this was added to
vdev_raidz_io_done_verified() along with a new test case.
Lastly, this change updates the redundancy_draid_spare1 and
redundancy_draid_spare3 test cases to be more representative
of normal dRAID replacement operation. Specifically, what we
care about is that the scrub run after a sequential resilver
does not find additional blocks which need repair. This would
indicate the sequential resilver failed to rebuild a section of
one of the devices. Note also the tests were switched to using
the verify_pool() function which still checks for checksum errors.
Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#12061
When dRAID performs a normal read operation only the data columns
in the raid map are read from disk. This is enough information to
calculate the checksum, verify it, and return the needed data to the
application. It's only in the event of a checksum failure that the
additional parity and any empty columns must be read since they are
required for parity reconstruction.
Reading these additional columns is handled by vdev_raidz_read_all()
which calls vdev_draid_map_alloc_empty() to expand the raid_map_t
and submit IOs for the missing columns. This all works correctly,
but it fails to account for any "short" columns. These are data
columns which are padded with a empty skip sector at the end.
Since that empty sector is not needed for a normal read it's not
read when columns is first read from disk. However, like the parity
and empty columns the skip sector is needed to perform reconstruction.
The fix is to mark any "short" columns as never being read by clearing
the rc_tried flag when expanding the raid_map_t. This will cause
the entire column to re-read from disk in the event of a checksum
failure allowing the self-healing functionality to repair the block.
Note that this only effects the self-healing feature because when
scrubbing a pool the parity, data, and empty columns are all read
initially to verify their contents. Furthermore, only blocks which
contain "short" columns would be effected, and only when the memory
backing the skip sector wasn't already zeroed out.
This change extends the existing redundancy_raidz.ksh test case to
verify self-healing (as well as resilver and scrub). Then applies
the same test case to dRAID with a slightly modified version of
the test script called redundancy_draid.ksh. The unused variable
combrec was also removed from both test cases.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#12010
The RAIDZ and DRAID code is responsible for reporting checksum errors on
their child vdevs. Checksum errors represent events where a disk
returned data or parity that should have been correct, but was not. In
other words, these are instances of silent data corruption. The
checksum errors show up in the vdev stats (and thus `zpool status`'s
CKSUM column), and in the event log (`zpool events`).
Note, this is in contrast with the more common "noisy" errors where a
disk goes offline, in which case ZFS knows that the disk is bad and
doesn't try to read it, or the device returns an error on the requested
read or write operation.
RAIDZ/DRAID generate checksum errors via three code paths:
1. When RAIDZ/DRAID reconstructs a damaged block, checksum errors are
reported on any children whose data was not used during the
reconstruction. This is handled in `raidz_reconstruct()`. This is the
most common type of RAIDZ/DRAID checksum error.
2. When RAIDZ/DRAID is not able to reconstruct a damaged block, that
means that the data has been lost. The zio fails and an error is
returned to the consumer (e.g. the read(2) system call). This would
happen if, for example, three different disks in a RAIDZ2 group are
silently damaged. Since the damage is silent, it isn't possible to know
which three disks are damaged, so a checksum error is reported against
every child that returned data or parity for this read. (For DRAID,
typically only one "group" of children is involved in each io.) This
case is handled in `vdev_raidz_cksum_finish()`. This is the next most
common type of RAIDZ/DRAID checksum error.
3. If RAIDZ/DRAID is not able to reconstruct a damaged block (like in
case 2), but there happens to be additional copies of this block due to
"ditto blocks" (i.e. multiple DVA's in this blkptr_t), and one of those
copies is good, then RAIDZ/DRAID compares each sector of the data or
parity that it retrieved with the good data from the other DVA, and if
they differ then it reports a checksum error on this child. This
differs from case 2 in that the checksum error is reported on only the
subset of children that actually have bad data or parity. This case
happens very rarely, since normally only metadata has ditto blocks. If
the silent damage is extensive, there will be many instances of case 2,
and the pool will likely be unrecoverable.
The code for handling case 3 is considerably more complicated than the
other cases, for two reasons:
1. It needs to run after the main raidz read logic has completed. The
data RAIDZ read needs to be preserved until after the alternate DVA has
been read, which necessitates refcounts and callbacks managed by the
non-raidz-specific zio layer.
2. It's nontrivial to map the sections of data read by RAIDZ to the
correct data. For example, the correct data does not include the parity
information, so the parity must be recalculated based on the correct
data, and then compared to the parity that was read from the RAIDZ
children.
Due to the complexity of case 3, the rareness of hitting it, and the
minimal benefit it provides above case 2, this commit removes the code
for case 3. These types of errors will now be handled the same as case
2, i.e. the checksum error will be reported against all children that
returned data or parity.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Closes#11735
The `abd_get_offset_*()` routines create an abd_t that references
another abd_t, and doesn't allocate any pages/buffers of its own. In
some workloads, these routines may be called frequently, to create many
abd_t's representing small pieces of a single large abd_t. In
particular, the upcoming RAIDZ Expansion project makes heavy use of
these routines.
This commit adds the ability for the caller to allocate and provide the
abd_t struct to a variant of `abd_get_offset_*()`. This eliminates the
cost of allocating the abd_t and performing the accounting associated
with it (`abdstat_struct_size`). The RAIDZ/DRAID code uses this for
the `rc_abd`, which references the zio's abd. The upcoming RAIDZ
Expansion project will leverage this infrastructure to increase
performance of reads post-expansion by around 50%.
Additionally, some of the interfaces around creating and destroying
abd_t's are cleaned up. Most significantly, the distinction between
`abd_put()` and `abd_free()` is eliminated; all types of abd_t's are
now disposed of with `abd_free()`.
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Issue #8853Closes#11439
This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands
for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID
vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device.
This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full
parity to pool with a failed device.
A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type.
Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type:
`draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the
pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number
of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev.
zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...>
Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be
provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This
allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance
or capacity reasons. The supported options include:
zpool create <pool> \
draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \
<vdevs...>
- draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1)
- draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8)
- draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs
- draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0)
Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool
with two distributed spares using special allocation classes.
```
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0
draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
L0 ONLINE 0 0 0
L1 ONLINE 0 0 0
...
U25 ONLINE 0 0 0
U26 ONLINE 0 0 0
spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0
U27 ONLINE 0 0 0
draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
U28 ONLINE 0 0 0
U29 ONLINE 0 0 0
...
U42 ONLINE 0 0 0
U43 ONLINE 0 0 0
special
mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
L5 ONLINE 0 0 0
U5 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
L6 ONLINE 0 0 0
U6 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use
draid2-0-1 AVAIL
```
When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following
options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages
by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations.
-K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test
-D <value> - dRAID data drives per group
-S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares
-R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID)
The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault
test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the
dRAID feature.
Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com>
Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#10102
