2619 asynchronous destruction of ZFS file systems
2747 SPA versioning with zfs feature flags
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Reviewed by: Dan Kruchinin <dan.kruchinin@gmail.com>
Approved by: Eric Schrock <Eric.Schrock@delphix.com>
References:
illumos/illumos-gate@53089ab7c8illumos/illumos-gate@ad135b5d64
illumos changeset: 13700:2889e2596bd6
https://www.illumos.org/issues/2619https://www.illumos.org/issues/2747
NOTE: The grub specific changes were not ported. This change
must be made to the Linux grub packages.
Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Differences between how paging is done on Solaris and Linux can cause
deadlocks if KM_SLEEP is used in any the following contexts.
* The txg_sync thread
* The zvol write/discard threads
* The zpl_putpage() VFS callback
This is because KM_SLEEP will allow for direct reclaim which may result
in the VM calling back in to the filesystem or block layer to write out
pages. If a lock is held over this operation the potential exists to
deadlock the system. To ensure forward progress all memory allocations
in these contexts must us KM_PUSHPAGE which disables performing any I/O
to accomplish the memory allocation.
Previously, this behavior was acheived by setting PF_MEMALLOC on the
thread. However, that resulted in unexpected side effects such as the
exhaustion of pages in ZONE_DMA. This approach touchs more of the zfs
code, but it is more consistent with the right way to handle these cases
under Linux.
This is patch lays the ground work for being able to safely revert the
following commits which used PF_MEMALLOC:
21ade34 Disable direct reclaim for z_wr_* threads
cfc9a5c Fix zpl_writepage() deadlock
eec8164 Fix ASSERTION(!dsl_pool_sync_context(tx->tx_pool))
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@cs.stonybrook.edu>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #726
While I'd like to remove the various pragmas in module/zfs/dbuf.c.
There are consumers such as Lustre which still depend on dmu_buf_*
versions of the symbols. Until all consumers can be converted to
use only the dbuf_* names leave this symbol exported.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Export these symbols so they may be used by other ZFS consumers
besides the ZPL.
Remove three stale prototype definites from dbuf.h. The actual
implementations of these functions were removed/renamed long ago.
It would be good in the long term to remove the existing pragmas
we inherited from Solaris and simply use the dbuf_* names.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Hypothesis about what's going on here.
At some time in the past, something, i.e. dnode_reallocate()
calls one of:
dbuf_rm_spill(dn, tx);
These will do:
dbuf_rm_spill(dnode_t *dn, dmu_tx_t *tx)
dbuf_free_range(dn, DMU_SPILL_BLKID, DMU_SPILL_BLKID, tx)
dbuf_undirty(db, tx)
Currently dbuf_undirty can leave a spill block in dn_dirty_records[],
(it having been put there previously by dbuf_dirty) and free it.
Sometime later, dbuf_sync_list trips over this reference to free'd
(and typically reused) memory.
Also, dbuf_undirty can call dnode_clear_range with a bogus
block ID. It needs to test for DMU_SPILL_BLKID, similar to
how dnode_clear_range is called in dbuf_dirty().
References to Illumos issue and patch:
- https://www.illumos.org/issues/764
- https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/3f2366c2bb
Reviewed by: George Wilson <gwilson@zfsmail.com>
Reviewed by: Mark.Maybe@oracle.com
Reviewed by: Albert Lee <trisk@nexenta.com
Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@nexenta.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #340
Update two kmem_alloc()'s in dbuf_dirty() to use KM_PUSHPAGE.
Because these functions are called from txg_sync_thread we
must ensure they don't reenter the zfs filesystem code via
the .writepage callback. This would result in a deadlock.
This deadlock is rare and has only been observed once under
an abusive mmap() write workload.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Certain function must never be automatically inlined by gcc because
they are stack heavy or called recursively. This patch flags all
such functions I've found as 'noinline' to prevent gcc from making
the optimization.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Decrease stack usage for various call paths by forcing certain
functions to be inlined. By inlining the functions the overhead
of a new stack frame is removed at the cost of increased code size.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
This commit preserves the recursive function dbuf_hold_impl() but moves
the local variables and function arguments to the heap to minimize
the stack frame size. Enough space is initially allocated on the
stack for 20 levels of recursion. This technique was based on commit
34229a2f2ac07363f64ddd63e014964fff2f0671 which reduced stack usage of
traverse_visitbp().
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Remove all instances of list handling where the API is not used
and instead list data members are directly accessed. Doing this
sort of thing is bad for portability.
Additionally, ensure that list_link_init() is called on newly
created list nodes. This ensures the node is properly initialized
and does not rely on the assumption that zero'ing the list_node_t
via kmem_zalloc() is the same as proper initialization.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Fix non-c90 compliant code, for the most part these changes
simply deal with where a particular variable is declared.
Under c90 it must alway be done at the very start of a block.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
