Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Boris Protopopov
e3a07cd033 Use zfs range locks in ztest
The zfs range lock interface no longer tightly depends on a
znode_t and therefore can be used in ztest.  This allows the
previous ztest specific implementation to be removed, and for
additional test coverage of the shared version.

Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <david.chen@osnexus.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Protopopov <boris.protopopov@actifio.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #4023
Issue #4024
2016-05-17 10:40:30 -07:00
Chunwei Chen
d88895a069 Remove dummy znode from zvol_state
struct zvol_state contains a dummy znode, which is around 1KB on x64,
only for zfs_range_lock. But in reality, other than z_range_lock and
z_range_avl, zfs_range_lock only need znode on regular file, which
means we add 1KB on a structure and gain nothing.

In this patch, we remove the dummy znode for zvol_state. In order to
do that, we also need to refactor zfs_range_lock a bit. We move
z_range_lock and z_range_avl pair out of znode_t to form zfs_rlock_t.
This new struct replaces znode_t as the main handle inside the range
lock functions.

We also add pointers to z_size, z_blksz, and z_max_blksz so range lock
code doesn't depend on znode_t.  This allows non-ZPL consumers like
Lustre to use the range locks with their equivalent znode_t structure.

Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <david.chen@osnexus.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Protopopov <boris.protopopov@actifio.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #4510
2016-05-17 10:29:02 -07:00
Will Andrews
d3cc8b152e Illumos #3742
3742 zfs comments need cleaner, more consistent style
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Eric Schrock <eric.schrock@delphix.com>
Approved by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com>

References:
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/3742
  illumos/illumos-gate@f717074149

Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #1775

Porting notes:

1. The change to zfs_vfsops.c was dropped because it involves
   zfs_mount_label_policy, which does not exist in the Linux port.
2013-11-04 10:55:25 -08:00
Brian Behlendorf
450dc149bd Range lock performance improvements
The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit
8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux.  In particular, calling
cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because
the waiters may still be asleep.  Thus the following cv_destroy()
will free memory which may still be in use.

This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but
this in turn introduced a deadlock.  The deadlock was resolved
with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the
range lock.  This worked well but using the taskq for the free
resulted in a serious performace hit.  This is somewhat ironic
because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things
by making the free asynchronous.

This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the
taskq to a private free list.  Then items which must be free'd
are simply inserted in to the list.  When the range lock is dropped
it's safe to free the items.  The list is walked and all rl_t
entries are freed.

This change improves small cached read performance by 26x.  This
was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls
goes up significantly.  More surprisingly this change significantly
improves large cache read performance.  This probably attributable
to better cpu/memory locality.  Very likely the same processor
which allocated the memory is now freeing it.

bs	ext3	zfs	zfs+fix		faster
----------------------------------------------
512     435     3       79      	26x
1k      820     7       160     	22x
2k      1536    14      305     	21x
4k      2764    28      572     	20x
8k      3788    50      1024    	20x
16k     4300    86      1843    	21x
32k     4505    138     2560    	18x
64k     5324    252     3891    	15x
128k    5427    276     4710    	17x
256k    5427    413     5017    	12x
512k    5427    497     5324    	10x
1m      5427    521     5632    	10x

Closes #142
2011-03-08 12:44:06 -08:00
Brian Behlendorf
6283f55ea1 Support custom build directories and move includes
One of the neat tricks an autoconf style project is capable of
is allow configurion/building in a directory other than the
source directory.  The major advantage to this is that you can
build the project various different ways while making changes
in a single source tree.

For example, this project is designed to work on various different
Linux distributions each of which work slightly differently.  This
means that changes need to verified on each of those supported
distributions perferably before the change is committed to the
public git repo.

Using nfs and custom build directories makes this much easier.
I now have a single source tree in nfs mounted on several different
systems each running a supported distribution.  When I make a
change to the source base I suspect may break things I can
concurrently build from the same source on all the systems each
in their own subdirectory.

wget -c http://github.com/downloads/behlendorf/zfs/zfs-x.y.z.tar.gz
tar -xzf zfs-x.y.z.tar.gz
cd zfs-x-y-z

------------------------- run concurrently ----------------------
<ubuntu system>  <fedora system>  <debian system>  <rhel6 system>
mkdir ubuntu     mkdir fedora     mkdir debian     mkdir rhel6
cd ubuntu        cd fedora        cd debian        cd rhel6
../configure     ../configure     ../configure     ../configure
make             make             make             make
make check       make check       make check       make check

This change also moves many of the include headers from individual
incude/sys directories under the modules directory in to a single
top level include directory.  This has the advantage of making
the build rules cleaner and logically it makes a bit more sense.
2010-09-08 12:38:56 -07:00