Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
George Wilson
5899ea5a77 vdev_ashift should only be set once
== Motivation and Context

The new vdev ashift optimization prevents the removal of devices when
a zfs configuration is comprised of disks which have different logical
and physical block sizes. This is caused because we set 'spa_min_ashift'
in vdev_open and then later call 'vdev_ashift_optimize'. This would
result in an inconsistency between spa's ashift calculations and that
of the top-level vdev.

In addition, the optimization logical ignores the overridden ashift
value that would be provided by '-o ashift=<val>'.

== Description

This change reworks the vdev ashift optimization so that it's only
set the first time the device is configured. It still allows the
physical and logical ahsift values to be set every time the device
is opened but those values are only consulted on first open.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Cedric Berger <cedric@precidata.com>
Signed-off-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com>
External-Issue: DLPX-71831
Closes #10932
2020-09-18 12:40:20 -07:00
Ryan Moeller
6fe3498ca3
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD
Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much
larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by
external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk
drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices
(512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k
or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the
physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage
collection sequence on these devices.

Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would
yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks:

 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical
    and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical
    block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction
    reported the logical block size instead of the physical block
    size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has
    increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of
    the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with
    another identical device because it now appears that the smaller
    allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new
    device.

 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported
    by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite
    large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that
    requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k
    aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block
    size limit.

Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs
solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical
block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the
logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized
and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are
sub-optimal.

Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Closes #10619
2020-08-21 12:53:17 -07:00
Matthew Macy
7ddb753d17
freebsd: changes necessary to coexist with dtrace in tree
Fix header conflicts when building zfs with openzfs as a vendor import.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@ixsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Closes #10497
2020-07-01 09:10:08 -07:00
Matthew Macy
9f0a21e641
Add FreeBSD support to OpenZFS
Add the FreeBSD platform code to the OpenZFS repository.  As of this
commit the source can be compiled and tested on FreeBSD 11 and 12.
Subsequent commits are now required to compile on FreeBSD and Linux.
Additionally, they must pass the ZFS Test Suite on FreeBSD which is
being run by the CI.  As of this commit 1230 tests pass on FreeBSD
and there are no unexpected failures.

Reviewed-by: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Closes #898 
Closes #8987
2020-04-14 11:36:28 -07:00