A simple change, but so many tests break with it,
and those are the majority of this.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Closes#13078
As such, there are no specific synchronous semantics defined for
the xattrs. But for xattr=on, it does log to ZIL and zil_commit() is
done, if sync=always is set on dataset. This provides sync semantics
for xattr=on with sync=always set on dataset.
For the xattr=sa implementation, it doesn't log to ZIL, so, even with
sync=always, xattrs are not guaranteed to be synced before xattr call
returns to caller. So, xattr can be lost if system crash happens, before
txg carrying xattr transaction is synced.
This change adds xattr=sa logging to ZIL on xattr create/remove/update
and xattrs are synced to ZIL (zil_commit() done) for sync=always.
This makes xattr=sa behavior similar to xattr=on.
Implementation notes:
The actual logging is fairly straight-forward and does not warrant
additional explanation.
However, it has been 14 years since we last added new TX types
to the ZIL [1], hence this is the first time we do it after the
introduction of zpool features. Therefore, here is an overview of the
feature activation and deactivation workflow:
1. The feature must be enabled. Otherwise, we don't log the new
record type. This ensures compatibility with older software.
2. The feature is activated per-dataset, since the ZIL is per-dataset.
3. If the feature is enabled and dataset is not for zvol, any append to
the ZIL chain will activate the feature for the dataset. Likewise
for starting a new ZIL chain.
4. A dataset that doesn't have a ZIL chain has the feature deactivated.
We ensure (3) by activating on the first zil_commit() after the feature
was enabled. Since activating the features requires waiting for txg
sync, the first zil_commit() after enabling the feature will be slower
than usual. The downside is that this is really a conservative
approximation: even if we never append a 'TX_SETSAXATTR' to the ZIL
chain, we pay the penalty for feature activation. The upside is that the
user is in control of when we pay the penalty, i.e., upon enabling the
feature.
We ensure (4) by hooking into zil_sync(), where ZIL destroy actually
happens.
One more piece on feature activation, since it's spread across
multiple functions:
zil_commit()
zil_process_commit_list()
if lwb == NULL // first zil_commit since zil_open
zil_create()
if no log block pointer in ZIL header:
if feature enabled and not active:
// CASE 1
enable, COALESCE txg wait with dmu_tx that allocated the
log block
else // log block was allocated earlier than this zil_open
if feature enabled and not active:
// CASE 2
enable, EXPLICIT txg wait
else // already have an in-DRAM LWB
if feature enabled and not active:
// this happens when we enable the feature after zil_create
// CASE 3
enable, EXPLICIT txg wait
[1] da6c28aaf6
Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Schwarz <christian.schwarz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <freqlabs@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jitendra Patidar <jitendra.patidar@nutanix.com>
Closes#8768Closes#9078
It's noted very scarcely in the code as it stands, indeed the only
actual comment on this is
/*
* We have finished background destroying, but there is still
* some space left in the dp_free_dir. Transfer this leaked
* space to the dp_leak_dir.
*/
Introduced in fbeddd60b7 ("Illumos 4390 -
I/O errors can corrupt space map when deleting fs/vol"),
which explains, alongside the references, that this can only happen
with a corrupted pool
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Closes#13081
Nowhere in the description of the failmode property does it
clearly state how to bring a suspended pool back online.
Add a few words to property description and the zpool-clear(8)
man page.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#12907Closes#9395
Add properties, similar to pool properties, to each vdev.
This makes use of the existing per-vdev ZAP that was added as
part of device evacuation/removal.
A large number of read-only properties are exposed,
many of the members of struct vdev_t, that provide useful
statistics.
Adds support for read-only "removing" vdev property.
Adds the "allocating" property that defaults to "on" and
can be set to "off" to prevent future allocations from that
top-level vdev.
Supports user-defined vdev properties.
Includes support for properties.vdev in SYSFS.
Co-authored-by: Allan Jude <allan@klarasystems.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan Jude <allan@klarasystems.com>
Closes#11711
The code is integrated, builds fine, runs fine, there's not really
any reason not to.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Allan Jude <allan@klarasystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <tony.nguyen@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Closes#12735
This change primarily seeks to make implicit documentation explicit, as
it is not outright stated that options should be comma-separated, nor is
there a reason given for it.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ebdrup Jensen <debdrup@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#12579
Many things has changed since previous default was set many years ago.
Nowadays 8KB does not allow adequate compression or even decent space
efficiency on many of pools due to 4KB disk physical block rounding,
especially on RAIDZ and DRAID. It effectively limits write throughput
to only 2-3GB/s (250-350K blocks/s) due to sync thread, allocation,
vdev queue and other block rate bottlenecks. It keeps L2ARC expensive
despite many optimizations and dedup just unrealistic.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#12406
