Alien does not honour the %posttrans hook.
So move the dkms uninstall/install scripts to the
%pre/%post hooks in case of package install/upgrade.
In case of package removal, handle that in %preun.
Add removal of all old dkms modules.
Add checking for broken 'dkms status'. Handle that as
good as possible and warn the user about it.
Also add more verbose messages about what we are doing.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Mart Frauenlob <AllKind@fastest.cc>
Closes#15415
OpenEuler uses the same package manager DNF as RHEL/Fedora. And
it is similar to RHEL/Fedora.
OpenEuler Linux is becoming the mainstream Linux distro in China.
So adding support for it makes sense for the users. For more
details about it see: https://www.openeuler.org/en/.
Reviewed-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: Damian Szuberski <szuberskidamian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xinliang Liu <xinliang.liu@linaro.org>
Closes#14222
Get rid of RPM warnings on AlmaLinux 9:
"It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes"
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Closes#13584Closes#13638
This is a follow up to 3c35662299 which standardizes how the RHEL
version check is done. This simpler "0%{?rhel}" check is used
elsewhere in the packages so we do the same here.
Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa@datto.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#13501
The bug this was working around is no longer present.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Closes#13480Closes#13490
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes#10463Closes#13182
To ensure that the necessary packages are available during the %post and
%preun scriptlets, require them properly.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Till Maas <opensource@till.name>
Closes#12822Closes#12832
Having an old enough version of "file" and no "uncompress" program
installed can cause rpmbuild as root to crash and mangle rpmdb.
So let's add a build dependency for RPM-based systems.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Closes: #12071Closes: #12168
This change updates the documentation to refer to the project
as OpenZFS instead ZFS on Linux. Web links have been updated
to refer to https://github.com/openzfs/zfs. The extraneous
zfsonlinux.org web links in the ZED and SPL sources have been
dropped.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#11007
The DKMS module installs the entire source tree, including the .in files
that will later be substituted when building. This makes
brp_mangle_shebangs complain about shebang lines in the .in files.
Exclude everything under /usr/src from shebang mangling in the DKMS
package.
The KMOD package doesn't contain any of the files it excludes from
mangling, so just drop the exclusion.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: João Carlos Mendes Luís <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Closes#10581Closes#10582
Due to a mismatch between the text and a regex looking for that text,
the `%preuninstall` script would never run the `dkms remove` command
necessary to avoid corrupting the DKMS data configuration. Increase
regex specificity to avoid this issue.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Chris Lindee <chris.lindee+github@gmail.com>
Closes: #9891Closes#10327
Update the project website links contained in to repository to
reference the secure https://zfsonlinux.org address.
Reviewed-By: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: Garrett Fields <ghfields@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kjeld Schouten <kjeld@schouten-lebbing.nl>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#9837
Debian zfs-dkms package generated by alien doesn't call the prerm script
(rpm's %preun) with an integer as first parameter, which results in the
following warning when the package is uninstalled:
"zfs-dkms.prerm: line 3: [: remove: integer expression expected"
Modify the if-condition to avoid the warning.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
Closes#9271
The cmp and diff utilities are required at configure time. Add
a dependency on diffutils to ensure they are installed.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Kash Pande <kash@tripleback.net>
Closes#5205Closes#8428
If you were upgrading from say, fc28->fc29, on ZFS version X, the RPMs
macros would get called like this:
%post X.fc29
- This is the step where fc29 gets built by dkms.
As part of the build, dkms automatically removes the previous
modules before building the new ones. It then builds the new
modules.
%preun X.fc28
- Right before this step, X.fc29 is be built and installed, but
since it has the same X, it's files get inadvertently removed
by fc28's uninstall.
%postun X.fc28
This patch updates %preun X.fc28 to see if we're upgrading or
uninstalling. If we're uninstalling, then remove our files. If we're
upgrading then do nothing, since will know dkms will have already
removed our files in %post X.fc29.
Note that since this fixes the %preun step, it's effect isn't going
to be noticed immediately. It will only be seen when packages
with this fix are upgraded to a newer version.
Reviewed-by: Ralf Ertzinger <ralf@skytale.net>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Closes#6902Closes#8216
Ensure that the _unitdir, _presetdir, _modulesloaddir, and
_systemdgeneratordir macros are always defined. If not set
them to the expected default values. Pass all of these options
to ./configure and package the resulting files in those locations.
Additionally, set __brp_mangle_shebangs_exclude_from until the
conversion to Python 3 is complete so they may be built cleanly
under mock.
Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa@datto.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#7567Closes#8119
Remove the %changelog section from the spec files since it does
not get updated in the master branch. Not only does this mean
the information is stale, but it can result in 'make deb' failing
to build packages, issue #7825. This section should be updated
for tagged releases.
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe Di Natale <guss80@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#7825Closes#7827
Minimal changes required to integrate the SPL sources in to the
ZFS repository build infrastructure and packaging.
Build system and packaging:
* Renamed SPL_* autoconf m4 macros to ZFS_*.
* Removed redundant SPL_* autoconf m4 macros.
* Updated the RPM spec files to remove SPL package dependency.
* The zfs package obsoletes the spl package, and the zfs-kmod
package obsoletes the spl-kmod package.
* The zfs-kmod-devel* packages were updated to add compatibility
symlinks under /usr/src/spl-x.y.z until all dependent packages
can be updated. They will be removed in a future release.
* Updated copy-builtin script for in-kernel builds.
* Updated DKMS package to include the spl.ko.
* Updated stale AUTHORS file to include all contributors.
* Updated stale COPYRIGHT and included the SPL as an exception.
* Renamed README.markdown to README.md
* Renamed OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE to LICENSE.
* Renamed DISCLAIMER to NOTICE.
Required code changes:
* Removed redundant HAVE_SPL macro.
* Removed _BOOT from nvpairs since it doesn't apply for Linux.
* Initial header cleanup (removal of empty headers, refactoring).
* Remove SPL repository clone/build from zimport.sh.
* Use of DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE and DEFINE_SPINLOCK removed due
to build issues when forcing C99 compilation.
* Replaced legacy ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
* Include needed headers for `current` and `EXPORT_SYMBOL`.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Olaf Faaland <faaland1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
TEST_ZIMPORT_SKIP="yes"
Closes#7556
By default additional dependencies are generated automatically for
packages. This is normally a good thing because it helps ensure
things just work. It doesn't make sense for the DKMS package which
requires minimal dependencies that can be easily listed.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#6467Closes#6835
* config/deb.am: Enable building DKMS packages for Debian
* rpm/generic/zfs-dkms.spec.in: Adjust spec to be Debian-compatible
* Condition kernel-devel Req to RPM distros
* Adjust the DKMS Req to have a minimum of a version only
* Ensure that --rpm_safe_upgrade isn't used on non-RPM distros
* config/deb.am: Drop CONFIG_KERNEL and CONFIG_USER guards
* Makefile.am: Add pkg-dkms target
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa@datto.com>
Closes#6044Closes#6731
Modern versions of dkms cleanup the build directory after installing.
This resulted in 'dkms uninstall' never running because the check
added by commit 866c162 which verifies the existance of the
zfs.release build product would never be true.
This patch resolves the issue by updating the conditional to check
in the explicitly installed zfs_config.h file for the version.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#3862
Running 'yum upgrade zfs-dkms' package could appear to work properly
and still leave you with no zfs modules installed. This will occur
when only the zfs release, and not the version, are incremented.
This may be the case for a fast moving zfs-testing repository.
During the upgrade process DKMS will realize that zfs-x.y.z is already
installed and remove it. DKMS then correctly builds the new modules
for zfs-x.y.z. However, as a final step when the old zfs-x.y.z-r is
removed the %preun script runs and removes the newly build modules.
To handle this case the %preun script has been updated to only run
when the installed version exactly matches the full spec file version.
This change also updated ChangeLog section based on the DKMS
reference spec file.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Version 2.2.0.3-20 of dkms in the EPEL/Fedora repositories added the
necessary patches to support ZoL, Therefore, the zfs-dkms requirement
on dkms is set to match that version or higher. This allows us to
drop the custom dkms build in the ZoL EPEL/Fedora repositories.
References:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023598
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#1873
By adding a dkms_version conditional it's now possible to specify
an exact version of dkms. This is used by the Fedora and EPEL
yum repositories to ensure the patched version of dkms provided
by the repository is installed. The patched version of dkms
ensures that the spl modules are built before the zfs modules.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#1466
For the DKMS package to successfully build the kernel-devel
headers must be included along gcc, make, and perl. The ZFS
code never directly invokes perl but the kernel build system
depends on it.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#1380
Because the zfs-dkms package also provides zfs-kmod for the
zfs user package yum flags this as a conflict. To avoid the
problem remove the Conflicts tag from zfs-dkms and just rely
on the one in zfs-kmod.
zfs-dkms-0.6.0-rc14.fc18.noarch has installed conflicts
zfs-kmod: zfs-dkms-0.6.0-rc14.fc18.noarch
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
The spl, zfs-test, and zfs-dracut packages should be pulled in
by the core zfs package. This allows all the required zfs packages
to be installed from a yum repository by running:
yum install zfs
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Adding the 'spl-dkms = VERSION' dependency to the zfs-dkms
package ensures the spl will be installed before zfs. This
cleanly handles the initial 'yum localinstall' case.
However, this does not address the dkms rebuilds caused by
a new kernel being installed. For that we still rely on the
clunky --with-spl-timeout=<timeout> configure option which
allows the zfs compilation to be briefly delayed while the
spl components are built.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Refresh the existing RPM packaging to conform to the 'Fedora
Packaging Guidelines'. This includes adopting the kmods2
packaging standard which is used fod kmods distributed by
rpmfusion for Fedora/RHEL.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelineshttp://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2
While the spec files have been entirely rewritten from a
user perspective the only major changes are:
* The Fedora packages now have a build dependency on the
rpmfusion repositories. The generic kmod packages also
have a new dependency on kmodtool-1.22 but it is bundled
with the source rpm so no additional packages are needed.
* The kernel binary module packages have been renamed from
zfs-modules-* to kmod-zfs-* as specificed by kmods2.
* The is now a common kmod-zfs-devel-* package in addition
to the per-kernel devel packages. The common package
contains the development headers while the per-kernel
package contains kernel specific build products.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#1341
