The newest Fedora packaging rules print warnings for scripts using the
/usr/bin/python shebang:
*** WARNING: mangling shebang in /usr/src/spl-0.7.0/cmd/splslab/splslab.py
from #!/usr/bin/python to #!/usr/bin/python2. This will become an ERROR,
fix it manually!
Fedora wants all cross compatible scripts to pick python3. Since we
don't want our users to have to pick a specific version of python, we
exclude our scripts from the RPM build check.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Closes: #699Closes: #700
* config/deb.am: Enable building DKMS packages for Debian
* rpm/generic/spl-dkms.spec.in: Adjust spec to be Debian-compatible
* Condition kernel-devel Requires to RPM distros
* Ensure that --rpm_safe_upgrade isn't used on non-RPM distros
* config/deb.am: Drop CONFIG_KERNEL and CONFIG_USER guards
* Makefile.am: Add pkg-dkms target
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa@datto.com>
Closes#657
Modern versions of dkms cleanup the build directory after installing.
This resulted in 'dkms uninstall' never running because the check
added by commit 4cdcdbf which verifies the existence of the
spl.release build product would never be true.
This patch resolves the issue by updating the conditional to check
in the explicitly installed spl_config.h file for the version.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#478
Running 'yum upgrade spl-dkms' package could appear to work properly
and still leave you with no spl modules installed. This will occur
when only the spl release, and not the version, are incremented.
This may be the case for a fast moving spl-testing repository.
During the upgrade process DKMS will realize that spl-x.y.z is already
installed and remove it. DKMS then correctly builds the new modules
for spl-x.y.z. However, as a final step when the old spl-x.y.z-r is
removed the %preun script runs and removes the newly build modules.
To handle this case the %preun script has been updated to only run
when the installed version exactly matches the full spec file version.
This change also updated ChangeLog section based on the DKMS
reference spec file.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
For the DKMS package to successfully build the kernel-devel
headers must be included along gcc, make, and perl. The SPL
code never directly invokes perl but the kernel build system
depends on it.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue zfsonlinux/zfs#1380
Because the spl-dkms package also provides spl-kmod for the
spl user package yum flags this as a conflict. To avoid the
problem remove the Conflicts tag from spl-dkms and just rely
on the one in spl-kmod.
spl-dkms-0.6.0-rc14.fc18.noarch has installed conflicts
spl-kmod: spl-dkms-0.6.0-rc14.fc18.noarch
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Refresh the existing RPM packaging to conform to the 'Fedora
Packaging Guidelines'. This includes adopting the kmods2
packaging standard which is used fod kmods distributed by
rpmfusion for Fedora/RHEL.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelineshttp://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2
While the spec files have been entirely rewritten from a
user perspective the only major changes are:
* The Fedora packages now have a build dependency on the
rpmfusion repositories. The generic kmod packages also
have a new dependency on kmodtool-1.22 but it is bundled
with the source rpm so no additional packages are needed.
* The kernel binary module packages have been renamed from
spl-modules-* to kmod-spl-* as specificed by kmods2.
* The is now a common kmod-spl-devel-* package in addition
to the per-kernel devel packages. The common package
contains the development headers while the per-kernel
package contains kernel specific build products.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#222