Mark functions used only in the same translation unit as static. This
only includes functions that do not have a prototype in a header file
either.
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Closes#10470
Expand the FreeBSD spl for kstats to support all current types
Move the dataset_kstats_t back to zvol_state_t from zfs_state_os_t
now that it is common once again
```
kstat.zfs/mypool.dataset.objset-0x10b.nunlinked: 0
kstat.zfs/mypool.dataset.objset-0x10b.nunlinks: 0
kstat.zfs/mypool.dataset.objset-0x10b.nread: 150528
kstat.zfs/mypool.dataset.objset-0x10b.reads: 48
kstat.zfs/mypool.dataset.objset-0x10b.nwritten: 134217728
kstat.zfs/mypool.dataset.objset-0x10b.writes: 1024
kstat.zfs/mypool.dataset.objset-0x10b.dataset_name: mypool/datasetname
```
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed by: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Allan Jude <allan@klarasystems.com>
Closes#10386
We can improve the performance of writes to zvols by using
dmu_tx_hold_write_by_dnode() instead of dmu_tx_hold_write(). This
reduces lock contention on the first block of the dnode object, and also
reduces the amount of CPU needed. The benefit will be highest with
multi-threaded async writes (i.e. writes that don't call zil_commit()).
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <tony.nguyen@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Closes#10184
Commit https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/3d745ea5 simplified
the blk_alloc_queue() interface by updating it to take the request
queue as an argument. Add a wrapper function which accepts the new
arguments and internally uses the available interfaces.
Other minor changes include increasing the Linux-Maximum to 5.6 now
that 5.6 has been released. It was not bumped to 5.7 because this
release has not yet been finalized and is still subject to change.
Added local 'struct zvol_state_os *zso' variable to zvol_alloc.
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#10181Closes#10187
== Summary ==
Prior to this change, sync writes to a zvol are processed serially.
This commit makes zvols process concurrently outstanding sync writes in
parallel, similar to how reads and async writes are already handled.
The result is that the throughput of sync writes is tripled.
== Background ==
When a write comes in for a zvol (e.g. over iscsi), it is processed by
calling `zvol_request()` to initiate the operation. ZFS is expected to
later call `BIO_END_IO()` when the operation completes (possibly from a
different thread). There are a limited number of threads that are
available to call `zvol_request()` - one one per iscsi client (unless
using MC/S). Therefore, to ensure good performance, the latency of
`zvol_request()` is important, so that many i/o operations to the zvol
can be processed concurrently. In other words, if the client has
multiple outstanding requests to the zvol, the zvol should have multiple
outstanding requests to the storage hardware (i.e. issue multiple
concurrent `zio_t`'s).
For reads, and async writes (i.e. writes which can be acknowledged
before the data reaches stable storage), `zvol_request()` achieves low
latency by dispatching the bulk of the work (including waiting for i/o
to disk) to a taskq. The taskq callback (`zvol_read()` or
`zvol_write()`) blocks while waiting for the i/o to disk to complete.
The `zvol_taskq` has 32 threads (by default), so we can have up to 32
concurrent i/os to disk in service of requests to zvols.
However, for sync writes (i.e. writes which must be persisted to stable
storage before they can be acknowledged, by calling `zil_commit()`),
`zvol_request()` does not use `zvol_taskq`. Instead it blocks while
waiting for the ZIL write to disk to complete. This has the effect of
serializing sync writes to each zvol. In other words, each zvol will
only process one sync write at a time, waiting for it to be written to
the ZIL before accepting the next request.
The same issue applies to FLUSH operations, for which `zvol_request()`
calls `zil_commit()` directly.
== Description of change ==
This commit changes `zvol_request()` to use
`taskq_dispatch_ent(zvol_taskq)` for sync writes, and FLUSh operations.
Therefore we can have up to 32 threads (the taskq threads)
simultaneously calling `zil_commit()`, for a theoretical performance
improvement of up to 32x.
To avoid the locking issue described in the comment (which this commit
removes), we acquire the rangelock from the taskq callback (e.g.
`zvol_write()`) rather than from `zvol_request()`. This applies to all
writes (sync and async), reads, and discard operations. This means that
multiple simultaneously-outstanding i/o's which access the same block
can complete in any order. This was previously thought to be incorrect,
but a review of the block device interface requirements revealed that
this is fine - the order is inherently not defined. The shorter hold
time of the rangelock should also have a slight performance improvement.
For an additional slight performance improvement, we use
`taskq_dispatch_ent()` instead of `taskq_dispatch()`, which avoids a
`kmem_alloc()` and eliminates a failure mode. This applies to all
writes (sync and async), reads, and discard operations.
== Performance results ==
We used a zvol as an iscsi target (server) for a Windows initiator
(client), with a single connection (the default - i.e. not MC/S).
We used `diskspd` to generate a workload with 4 threads, doing 1MB
writes to random offsets in the zvol. Without this change we get
231MB/s, and with the change we get 728MB/s, which is 3.15x the original
performance.
We ran a real-world workload, restoring a MSSQL database, and saw
throughput 2.5x the original.
We saw more modest performance wins (typically 1.5x-2x) when using MC/S
with 4 connections, and with different number of client threads (1, 8,
32).
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <tony.nguyen@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Closes#10163
When we finish a zfs receive, dmu_recv_end_sync() calls
zvol_create_minors(async=TRUE). This kicks off some other threads that
create the minor device nodes (in /dev/zvol/poolname/...). These async
threads call zvol_prefetch_minors_impl() and zvol_create_minor(), which
both call dmu_objset_own(), which puts a "long hold" on the dataset.
Since the zvol minor node creation is asynchronous, this can happen
after the `ZFS_IOC_RECV[_NEW]` ioctl and `zfs receive` process have
completed.
After the first receive ioctl has completed, userland may attempt to do
another receive into the same dataset (e.g. the next incremental
stream). This second receive and the asynchronous minor node creation
can interfere with one another in several different ways, because they
both require exclusive access to the dataset:
1. When the second receive is finishing up, dmu_recv_end_check() does
dsl_dataset_handoff_check(), which can fail with EBUSY if the async
minor node creation already has a "long hold" on this dataset. This
causes the 2nd receive to fail.
2. The async udev rule can fail if zvol_id and/or systemd-udevd try to
open the device while the the second receive's async attempt at minor
node creation owns the dataset (via zvol_prefetch_minors_impl). This
causes the minor node (/dev/zd*) to exist, but the udev-generated
/dev/zvol/... to not exist.
3. The async minor node creation can silently fail with EBUSY if the
first receive's zvol_create_minor() trys to own the dataset while the
second receive's zvol_prefetch_minors_impl already owns the dataset.
To address these problems, this change synchronously creates the minor
node. To avoid the lock ordering problems that the asynchrony was
introduced to fix (see #3681), we create the minor nodes from open
context, with no locks held, rather than from syncing contex as was
originally done.
Implementation notes:
We generally do not need to traverse children or prefetch anything (e.g.
when running the recv, snapshot, create, or clone subcommands of zfs).
We only need recursion when importing/opening a pool and when loading
encryption keys. The existing recursive, asynchronous, prefetching code
is preserved for use in these cases.
Channel programs may need to create zvol minor nodes, when creating a
snapshot of a zvol with the snapdev property set. We figure out what
snapshots are created when running the LUA program in syncing context.
In this case we need to remember what snapshots were created, and then
try to create their minor nodes from open context, after the LUA code
has completed.
There are additional zvol use cases that asynchronously own the dataset,
which can cause similar problems. E.g. changing the volmode or snapdev
properties. These are less problematic because they are not recursive
and don't touch datasets that are not involved in the operation, there
is still potential for interference with subsequent operations. In the
future, these cases should be similarly converted to create the zvol
minor node synchronously from open context.
The async tasks of removing and renaming minors do not own the objset,
so they do not have this problem. However, it may make sense to also
convert these operations to happen synchronously from open context, in
the future.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
External-issue: DLPX-65948
Closes#7863Closes#9885
Increase the minimum supported kernel version from 2.6.32 to 3.10.
This removes support for the following Linux enterprise distributions.
Distribution | Kernel | End of Life
---------------- | ------ | -------------
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS | 3.2 | Apr 28, 2017
SLES 11 | 3.0 | Mar 32, 2019
RHEL / CentOS 6 | 2.6.32 | Nov 30, 2020
The following changes were made as part of removing support.
* Updated `configure` to enforce a minimum kernel version as
specified in the META file (Linux-Minimum: 3.10).
configure: error:
*** Cannot build against kernel version 2.6.32.
*** The minimum supported kernel version is 3.10.
* Removed all `configure` kABI checks and matching C code for
interfaces which solely predate the Linux 3.10 kernel.
* Updated all `configure` kABI checks to fail when an interface is
missing which was in the 3.10 kernel up to the latest 5.1 kernel.
Removed the HAVE_* preprocessor defines for these checks and
updated the code to unconditionally use the verified interface.
* Inverted the detection logic in several kABI checks to match
the new interface as it appears in 3.10 and newer and not the
legacy interface.
* Consolidated the following checks in to individual files. Due
the large number of changes in the checks it made sense to handle
this now. It would be desirable to group other related checks in
the same fashion, but this as left as future work.
- config/kernel-blkdev.m4 - Block device kABI checks
- config/kernel-blk-queue.m4 - Block queue kABI checks
- config/kernel-bio.m4 - Bio interface kABI checks
* Removed the kABI checks for sops->nr_cached_objects() and
sops->free_cached_objects(). These interfaces are currently unused.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes#9566
A struct rangelock already exists on FreeBSD. Add a zfs_ prefix as
per our convention to prevent any conflict with existing symbols.
This change is a follow up to 2cc479d0.
Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#9534
This logic is not platform dependent and should reside in the
common code.
Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#9505
A rangelock KPI already exists on FreeBSD. Add a zfs_ prefix as
per our convention to prevent any conflict with existing symbols.
Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#9402
We've seen cases where after creating a ZVOL, the ZVOL device node in
"/dev" isn't generated after 20 seconds of waiting, which is the point
at which our applications gives up on waiting and reports an error.
The workload when this occurs is to "refresh" 400+ ZVOLs roughly at the
same time, based on a policy set by the user. This refresh operation
will destroy the ZVOL, and re-create it based on a snapshot.
When this occurs, we see many hundreds of entries on the "z_zvol" taskq
(based on inspection of the /proc/spl/taskq-all file). Many of the
entries on the taskq end up in the "zvol_remove_minors_impl" function,
and I've measured the latency of that function:
Function = zvol_remove_minors_impl
msecs : count distribution
0 -> 1 : 0 | |
2 -> 3 : 0 | |
4 -> 7 : 1 | |
8 -> 15 : 0 | |
16 -> 31 : 0 | |
32 -> 63 : 0 | |
64 -> 127 : 1 | |
128 -> 255 : 45 |****************************************|
256 -> 511 : 5 |**** |
That data is from a 10 second sample, using the BCC "funclatency" tool.
As we can see, in this 10 second sample, most calls took 128ms at a
minimum. Thus, some basic math tells us that in any 20 second interval,
we could only process at most about 150 removals, which is much less
than the 400+ that'll occur based on the workload.
As a result of this, and since all ZVOL minor operations will go through
the single threaded "z_zvol" taskq, the latency for creating a single
ZVOL device can be unreasonably large due to other ZVOL activity on the
system. In our case, it's large enough to cause the application to
generate an error and fail the operation.
When profiling the "zvol_remove_minors_impl" function, I saw that most
of the time in the function was spent off-cpu, blocked in the function
"taskq_wait_outstanding". How this works, is "zvol_remove_minors_impl"
will dispatch calls to "zvol_free" using the "system_taskq", and then
the "taskq_wait_outstanding" function is used to wait for all of those
dispatched calls to occur before "zvol_remove_minors_impl" will return.
As far as I can tell, "zvol_remove_minors_impl" doesn't necessarily have
to wait for all calls to "zvol_free" to occur before it returns. Thus,
this change removes the call to "taskq_wait_oustanding", so that calls
to "zvol_free" don't affect the latency of "zvol_remove_minors_impl".
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: John Gallagher <john.gallagher@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Closes#9380
Refactor the zvol in to platform dependent and independent bits.
Reviewed-by: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>
Closes#9295
