mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_zfs.git
synced 2024-11-17 10:01:01 +03:00
Skip dnode handles use when not needed
Neither FreeBSD nor Linux currently implement kmem_cache_set_move(), which means dnode_move() is never called. In such situation use of dnode handles with respective locking to access dnode from dbuf is a waste of time for no benefit. This patch implements optional simplified code for such platforms, saving at least 3 dnode lock/dereference/unlock per dbuf life cycle. Originally I hoped to drop the handles completely to save memory, but they are still used in dnodes allocation code, so left for now. Before this change in CPU profiles of some workloads I saw 4-20% of CPU time spent in zrl_add_impl()/zrl_remove(), which are gone now. Reviewed-by: Rob Wing <rob.wing@klarasystems.com Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Allan Jude <allan@klarasystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes #16374
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a3e32e6a2
commit
ed87d456e4
@ -214,9 +214,15 @@ typedef struct dmu_buf_impl {
|
||||
struct objset *db_objset;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* handle to safely access the dnode we belong to (NULL when evicted)
|
||||
* Handle to safely access the dnode we belong to (NULL when evicted)
|
||||
* if dnode_move() is used on the platform, or just dnode otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#if !defined(__linux__) && !defined(__FreeBSD__)
|
||||
#define USE_DNODE_HANDLE 1
|
||||
struct dnode_handle *db_dnode_handle;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
struct dnode *db_dnode;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* our parent buffer; if the dnode points to us directly,
|
||||
@ -417,11 +423,19 @@ void dbuf_stats_destroy(void);
|
||||
int dbuf_dnode_findbp(dnode_t *dn, uint64_t level, uint64_t blkid,
|
||||
blkptr_t *bp, uint16_t *datablkszsec, uint8_t *indblkshift);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef USE_DNODE_HANDLE
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE(_db) ((_db)->db_dnode_handle->dnh_dnode)
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE_LOCK(_db) ((_db)->db_dnode_handle->dnh_zrlock)
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE_ENTER(_db) (zrl_add(&DB_DNODE_LOCK(_db)))
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE_EXIT(_db) (zrl_remove(&DB_DNODE_LOCK(_db)))
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE_HELD(_db) (!zrl_is_zero(&DB_DNODE_LOCK(_db)))
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE(_db) ((_db)->db_dnode)
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE_LOCK(_db)
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE_ENTER(_db)
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE_EXIT(_db)
|
||||
#define DB_DNODE_HELD(_db) (B_TRUE)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
void dbuf_init(void);
|
||||
void dbuf_fini(void);
|
||||
|
@ -3103,7 +3103,11 @@ dbuf_destroy(dmu_buf_impl_t *db)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_enter(&dn->dn_mtx);
|
||||
dnode_rele_and_unlock(dn, db, B_TRUE);
|
||||
#ifdef USE_DNODE_HANDLE
|
||||
db->db_dnode_handle = NULL;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
db->db_dnode = NULL;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
dbuf_hash_remove(db);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@ -3252,7 +3256,11 @@ dbuf_create(dnode_t *dn, uint8_t level, uint64_t blkid,
|
||||
db->db_level = level;
|
||||
db->db_blkid = blkid;
|
||||
db->db_dirtycnt = 0;
|
||||
#ifdef USE_DNODE_HANDLE
|
||||
db->db_dnode_handle = dn->dn_handle;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
db->db_dnode = dn;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
db->db_parent = parent;
|
||||
db->db_blkptr = blkptr;
|
||||
db->db_hash = hash;
|
||||
|
@ -1020,6 +1020,19 @@ dnode_move(void *buf, void *newbuf, size_t size, void *arg)
|
||||
int64_t refcount;
|
||||
uint32_t dbufs;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef USE_DNODE_HANDLE
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can't move dnodes if dbufs reference them directly without
|
||||
* using handles and respecitve locking. Unless USE_DNODE_HANDLE
|
||||
* is defined the code below is only to make sure it still builds,
|
||||
* but it should never be used, since it is unsafe.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef ZFS_DEBUG
|
||||
PANIC("dnode_move() called without USE_DNODE_HANDLE");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return (KMEM_CBRC_NO);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The dnode is on the objset's list of known dnodes if the objset
|
||||
* pointer is valid. We set the low bit of the objset pointer when
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user