c/mirror_zfs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_zfs.git synced 2024-12-25 10:49:34 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

OpenZFS 9426 - metaslab size can exceed offset addressable by spacemap

Browse Source 
Authored by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com>
Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>

OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9426
OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/f1c88afb1
Closes #7700
This commit is contained in:
Don Brady 2017-08-11 15:28:17 -06:00 committed by Brian Behlendorf
parent e902ddb0f8
commit e4e94ca315
2 changed files with 67 additions and 28 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5
View File

@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ Use \fB1\fR for yes (default) and \fB0\fR for no.
\fBvdev_max_ms_count\fR (int)
.ad
.RS 12n
When a vdev is added, it will be divided into approximately (but no more than) this number of metaslabs.
When a vdev is added target this number of metaslabs per top-level vdev.
.sp
Default value: \fB200\fR.
.RE
@ -312,6 +312,17 @@ Minimum number of metaslabs to create in a top-level vdev.
Default value: \fB16\fR.
.RE
.sp
.ne 2
.na
\fBvdev_ms_count_limit\fR (int)
.ad
.RS 12n
Practical upper limit of total metaslabs per top-level vdev.
.sp
Default value: \fB131,072\fR.
.RE
.sp
.ne 2
.na

82
module/zfs/vdev.c
View File

@ -52,15 +52,21 @@
#include <sys/zvol.h>
#include <sys/zfs_ratelimit.h>
/* maximum number of metaslabs per top-level vdev */
/* target number of metaslabs per top-level vdev */
int vdev_max_ms_count = 200;
/* minimum amount of metaslabs per top-level vdev */
/* minimum number of metaslabs per top-level vdev */
int vdev_min_ms_count = 16;
/* see comment in vdev_metaslab_set_size() */
/* practical upper limit of total metaslabs per top-level vdev */
int vdev_ms_count_limit = 1ULL << 17;
/* lower limit for metaslab size (512M) */
int vdev_default_ms_shift = 29;
/* upper limit for metaslab size (256G) */
int vdev_max_ms_shift = 38;
int vdev_validate_skip = B_FALSE;
/*
@ -2130,34 +2136,53 @@ void
vdev_metaslab_set_size(vdev_t *vd)
{
uint64_t asize = vd->vdev_asize;
uint64_t ms_shift = 0;
uint64_t ms_count = asize >> vdev_default_ms_shift;
uint64_t ms_shift;
/*
* For vdevs that are bigger than 8G the metaslab size varies in
* a way that the number of metaslabs increases in powers of two,
* linearly in terms of vdev_asize, starting from 16 metaslabs.
* So for vdev_asize of 8G we get 16 metaslabs, for 16G, we get 32,
* and so on, until we hit the maximum metaslab count limit
* [vdev_max_ms_count] from which point the metaslab count stays
* the same.
* There are two dimensions to the metaslab sizing calculation:
* the size of the metaslab and the count of metaslabs per vdev.
* In general, we aim for vdev_max_ms_count (200) metaslabs. The
* range of the dimensions are as follows:
*
* 2^29 <= ms_size <= 2^38
* 16 <= ms_count <= 131,072
*
* On the lower end of vdev sizes, we aim for metaslabs sizes of
* at least 512MB (2^29) to minimize fragmentation effects when
* testing with smaller devices. However, the count constraint
* of at least 16 metaslabs will override this minimum size goal.
*
* On the upper end of vdev sizes, we aim for a maximum metaslab
* size of 256GB. However, we will cap the total count to 2^17
* metaslabs to keep our memory footprint in check.
*
* The net effect of applying above constrains is summarized below.
*
* vdev size metaslab count
* -------------|-----------------
* < 8GB ~16
* 8GB - 100GB one per 512MB
* 100GB - 50TB ~200
* 50TB - 32PB one per 256GB
* > 32PB ~131,072
* -------------------------------
*/
ms_shift = vdev_default_ms_shift;
if ((asize >> ms_shift) < vdev_min_ms_count) {
/*
* For devices that are less than 8G we want to have
* exactly 16 metaslabs. We don't want less as integer
* division rounds down, so less metaslabs mean more
* wasted space. We don't want more as these vdevs are
* small and in the likely event that we are running
* out of space, the SPA will have a hard time finding
* space due to fragmentation.
*/
if (ms_count < vdev_min_ms_count)
ms_shift = highbit64(asize / vdev_min_ms_count);
ms_shift = MAX(ms_shift, SPA_MAXBLOCKSHIFT);
} else if ((asize >> ms_shift) > vdev_max_ms_count) {
else if (ms_count > vdev_max_ms_count)
ms_shift = highbit64(asize / vdev_max_ms_count);
else
ms_shift = vdev_default_ms_shift;
if (ms_shift < SPA_MAXBLOCKSHIFT) {
ms_shift = SPA_MAXBLOCKSHIFT;
} else if (ms_shift > vdev_max_ms_shift) {
ms_shift = vdev_max_ms_shift;
/* cap the total count to constrain memory footprint */
if ((asize >> ms_shift) > vdev_ms_count_limit)
ms_shift = highbit64(asize / vdev_ms_count_limit);
}
vd->vdev_ms_shift = ms_shift;
@ -4392,13 +4417,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vdev_clear);
/* BEGIN CSTYLED */
module_param(vdev_max_ms_count, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vdev_max_ms_count,
"Divide added vdev into approximately (but no more than) this number "
"of metaslabs");
"Target number of metaslabs per top-level vdev");
module_param(vdev_min_ms_count, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vdev_min_ms_count,
"Minimum number of metaslabs per top-level vdev");
module_param(vdev_ms_count_limit, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vdev_ms_count_limit,
"Practical upper limit of total metaslabs per top-level vdev");
module_param(zfs_delays_per_second, uint, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(zfs_delays_per_second, "Rate limit delay events to this many "
"IO delays per second");