Fix typos in tests/

Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net>
Closes #9243
This commit is contained in:
Andrea Gelmini 2019-09-03 03:07:35 +02:00 committed by Tony Hutter
parent 500977eed2
commit d632608210
10 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
# STRATEGY:
# 1. Separately promote pool clone, filesystem clone and volume clone.
# 2. Recursively backup all the POOL and restore in POOL2
# 3. Verify all the datesets and property be properly received.
# 3. Verify all the datasets and properties were properly received.
#
verify_runnable "both"

View File

@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ for prop in $(fs_inherit_prop); do
done
#
# Inherit propertes in sub-datasets
# Inherit properties in sub-datasets
#
for ds in "$POOL/$FS/fs1" "$POOL/$FS/fs1/fs2" "$POOL/$FS/fs1/fclone" ; do
for prop in $(fs_inherit_prop) ; do

View File

@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
# 1. Setting properties for all the filesystem and volumes randomly
# 2. Backup all the data from POOL by send -R
# 3. Restore all the data in POOL2
# 4. Verify all the perperties in two pools are same
# 4. Verify all the properties in the two pools are the same
#
verify_runnable "global"

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#
# Strategy:
# 1. Bookmark a ZFS snapshot
# 2. Destroy the ZFS sanpshot
# 2. Destroy the ZFS snapshot
# 3. Destroy the filesystem for the receive
# 4. Verify receive of the full send stream
# 5. Start an incremental ZFS send of the ZFS bookmark, redirect output to a

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#
# Strategy:
# 1. Destroy the filesystem for the receive
# 2. Unmount the source filsesystem
# 2. Unmount the source filesystem
# 3. Start a full ZFS send, redirect output to a file
# 4. Mess up the contents of the stream state file on disk
# 5. Try ZFS receive, which should fail with a checksum mismatch error

View File

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ typeset inc=$BACKDIR/stream.inc
log_must zfs create -o compress=lz4 $sendfs
log_must zfs create -o compress=lz4 $recvfs
typeset dir=$(get_prop mountpoint $sendfs)
# Don't use write_compressible: we want compressible but undedupable data here.
# Don't use write_compressible: we want compressible but undeduplicable data.
log_must eval "dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1024k count=4 | base64 >$dir/file"
log_must zfs snapshot $sendfs@snap0
log_must eval "zfs send -D -c $sendfs@snap0 >$stream0"

View File

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
# 2. Mess up the contents of the stream state file on disk
# 3. Try ZFS receive, which should fail with a checksum mismatch error
# 4. ZFS send to the stream state file again using the receive_resume_token
# 5. ZFS receieve and verify the receive completes successfully
# 5. ZFS receive and verify the receive completes successfully
# 6. Repeat steps on an incremental ZFS send
#

View File

@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ for compress in $compress_types; do
"$vol_csize and $vol_refer differed by too much"
done
log_pass "The the stream size given by -P accounts for compressed send."
log_pass "The stream size given by -P accounts for compressed send."

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
# Strategy:
# 1. Create a pool containing an encrypted filesystem.
# 2. Use 'zfs send -wp' to perform a raw send of the initial filesystem.
# 3. Repeat the followings steps N times to verify raw incremental receives.
# 3. Repeat the following steps N times to verify raw incremental receives.
# a) Randomly change several key dataset properties.
# b) Modify the contents of the filesystem such that dnode reallocation
# is likely during the 'zfs receive', and receive_object() exercises

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
# Strategy:
# 1. Create a pool containing an encrypted filesystem.
# 2. Use 'zfs send -wp' to perform a raw send of the initial filesystem.
# 3. Repeat the followings steps N times to verify raw incremental receives.
# 3. Repeat the following steps N times to verify raw incremental receives.
# a) Randomly change several key dataset properties.
# b) Modify the contents of the filesystem such that dnode reallocation
# is likely during the 'zfs receive', and receive_object() exercises