Illumos #3603, #3604: bobj improvements

3603 panic from bpobj_enqueue_subobj()
3604 zdb should print bpobjs more verbosely
3871 GCC 4.5.3 does not like issue 3604 patch
Reviewed by: Henrik Mattson <henrik.mattson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Adam Leventhal <ahl@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@nexenta.com>

References:
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/3603
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/3604
  https://www.illumos.org/issues/3871
  illumos/illumos-gate@d04756377d

Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #1775

Note that the patch from Illumos issue 3871 is not accepted into Illumos
at the time of this writing. It is something that I wrote when porting
this. Documentation is in the Illumos issue.
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Ahrens
2013-07-05 15:37:16 -04:00
committed by Brian Behlendorf
parent 24a64651b4
commit d1fada1e6d
3 changed files with 62 additions and 19 deletions
+7 -1
View File
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2005, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2012 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2013 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
*/
#include <sys/bpobj.h>
@@ -418,6 +418,12 @@ bpobj_enqueue_subobj(bpobj_t *bpo, uint64_t subobj, dmu_tx_t *tx)
VERIFY3U(0, ==, dmu_buf_hold(bpo->bpo_os, subsubobjs,
0, FTAG, &subdb, 0));
/*
* Make sure that we are not asking dmu_write()
* to write more data than we have in our buffer.
*/
VERIFY3U(subdb->db_size, >=,
numsubsub * sizeof (subobj));
dmu_write(bpo->bpo_os, bpo->bpo_phys->bpo_subobjs,
bpo->bpo_phys->bpo_num_subobjs * sizeof (subobj),
numsubsub * sizeof (subobj), subdb->db_data, tx);
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1829,7 +1829,7 @@ __dmu_object_info_from_dnode(dnode_t *dn, dmu_object_info_t *doi)
doi->doi_checksum = dn->dn_checksum;
doi->doi_compress = dn->dn_compress;
doi->doi_physical_blocks_512 = (DN_USED_BYTES(dnp) + 256) >> 9;
doi->doi_max_offset = (dnp->dn_maxblkid + 1) * dn->dn_datablksz;
doi->doi_max_offset = (dn->dn_maxblkid + 1) * dn->dn_datablksz;
doi->doi_fill_count = 0;
for (i = 0; i < dnp->dn_nblkptr; i++)
doi->doi_fill_count += dnp->dn_blkptr[i].blk_fill;