mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_zfs.git
synced 2024-12-25 18:59:33 +03:00
Stop runtime pointer modifications in autotools checks
c38367c73f
was meant to eliminate runtime
function pointer modifications in autotools checks because they were
prone to false negatives on kernels hardened by the PaX project.
Unfortunately, I missed the xattr_handler and super_block->s_bdi
autotools checks. Recent changes to PaX constified
xattr_handler->get/set, which lead me to discover this oversight.
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #1433
This commit is contained in:
parent
4cf652e5d4
commit
b83e3e48c9
@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ AC_DEFUN([ZFS_AC_KERNEL_BDI], [
|
|||||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether super_block has s_bdi])
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether super_block has s_bdi])
|
||||||
ZFS_LINUX_TRY_COMPILE([
|
ZFS_LINUX_TRY_COMPILE([
|
||||||
#include <linux/fs.h>
|
#include <linux/fs.h>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static const struct super_block
|
||||||
|
sb __attribute__ ((unused)) {
|
||||||
|
.s_bdi = NULL,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
],[
|
],[
|
||||||
struct super_block sb __attribute__ ((unused));
|
|
||||||
sb.s_bdi = NULL;
|
|
||||||
],[
|
],[
|
||||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
||||||
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_BDI, 1, [struct super_block has s_bdi])
|
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_BDI, 1, [struct super_block has s_bdi])
|
||||||
|
@ -18,10 +18,11 @@ AC_DEFUN([ZFS_AC_KERNEL_CONST_XATTR_HANDLER],
|
|||||||
const struct xattr_handler *xattr_handlers[] = {
|
const struct xattr_handler *xattr_handlers[] = {
|
||||||
&xattr_test_handler,
|
&xattr_test_handler,
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
],[
|
|
||||||
struct super_block sb __attribute__ ((unused));
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
sb.s_xattr = xattr_handlers;
|
const struct super_block sb __attribute__ ((unused)) = {
|
||||||
|
.s_xattr = xattr_handlers,
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
],[
|
||||||
],[
|
],[
|
||||||
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
|
||||||
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_CONST_XATTR_HANDLER, 1,
|
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_CONST_XATTR_HANDLER, 1,
|
||||||
@ -40,12 +41,14 @@ AC_DEFUN([ZFS_AC_KERNEL_XATTR_HANDLER_GET], [
|
|||||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether xattr_handler->get() wants dentry])
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether xattr_handler->get() wants dentry])
|
||||||
ZFS_LINUX_TRY_COMPILE([
|
ZFS_LINUX_TRY_COMPILE([
|
||||||
#include <linux/xattr.h>
|
#include <linux/xattr.h>
|
||||||
],[
|
|
||||||
int (*get)(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
|
|
||||||
void *buffer, size_t size, int handler_flags) = NULL;
|
|
||||||
struct xattr_handler xops __attribute__ ((unused));
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
xops.get = get;
|
int get(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
|
||||||
|
void *buffer, size_t size, int handler_flags) { return 0; }
|
||||||
|
static const struct xattr_handler
|
||||||
|
xops __attribute__ ((unused)) = {
|
||||||
|
.get = get,
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
],[
|
||||||
],[
|
],[
|
||||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
||||||
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_DENTRY_XATTR_GET, 1,
|
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_DENTRY_XATTR_GET, 1,
|
||||||
@ -64,13 +67,15 @@ AC_DEFUN([ZFS_AC_KERNEL_XATTR_HANDLER_SET], [
|
|||||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether xattr_handler->set() wants dentry])
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether xattr_handler->set() wants dentry])
|
||||||
ZFS_LINUX_TRY_COMPILE([
|
ZFS_LINUX_TRY_COMPILE([
|
||||||
#include <linux/xattr.h>
|
#include <linux/xattr.h>
|
||||||
],[
|
|
||||||
int (*set)(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
|
|
||||||
const void *buffer, size_t size, int flags,
|
|
||||||
int handler_flags) = NULL;
|
|
||||||
struct xattr_handler xops __attribute__ ((unused));
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
xops.set = set;
|
int set(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
|
||||||
|
const void *buffer, size_t size, int flags,
|
||||||
|
int handler_flags) { return 0; }
|
||||||
|
static const struct xattr_handler
|
||||||
|
xops __attribute__ ((unused)) = {
|
||||||
|
.set = set,
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
],[
|
||||||
],[
|
],[
|
||||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
||||||
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_DENTRY_XATTR_SET, 1,
|
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_DENTRY_XATTR_SET, 1,
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user