mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_zfs.git
synced 2024-12-25 02:49:32 +03:00
bdev_discard_supported: understand discard_granularity=0
Kernel documentation for the discard_granularity property says: A discard_granularity of 0 means that the device does not support discard functionality. Some older kernels had drivers (notably loop, but also some USB-SATA adapters) that would set the QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD capability flag, but have discard_granularity=0. Since 5.10 (torvalds/linux@b35fd7422c) the discard entry point blkdev_issue_discard() has had a check for this, which would immediately reject the call with EOPNOTSUPP, and throw a scary diagnostic message into the log. See #16068. Since 6.8, the block layer sets a non-zero default for discard_granularity (torvalds/linux@3c407dc723), and a future kernel will remove the check entirely[1]. As such, there's no good reason for us to enable discard when discard_granularity=0. The kernel will never let the request go in anyway; better that we just disable it so we can report it properly to the user. 1. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/patch/20240312144826.1045212-2-hch@lst.de/ Sponsored-by: Klara, Inc. Sponsored-by: Wasabi Technology, Inc. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <rob.norris@klarasystems.com> Closes #16068 Closes #16082
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7605ae77b
commit
b181b2e604
@ -563,9 +563,11 @@ static inline boolean_t
|
||||
bdev_discard_supported(struct block_device *bdev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#if defined(HAVE_BDEV_MAX_DISCARD_SECTORS)
|
||||
return (!!bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev));
|
||||
return (bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev) > 0 &&
|
||||
bdev_discard_granularity(bdev) > 0);
|
||||
#elif defined(HAVE_BLK_QUEUE_DISCARD)
|
||||
return (!!blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(bdev)));
|
||||
return (blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(bdev)) > 0 &&
|
||||
bdev_get_queue(bdev)->limits.discard_granularity > 0);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#error "Unsupported kernel"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user