mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_zfs.git
synced 2026-05-24 03:08:51 +03:00
Illumos #3522
3522 zfs module should not allow uninitialized variables Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy <seb@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Adam Leventhal <ahl@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org> References: https://www.illumos.org/issues/3522 illumos/illumos-gate@d5285cae91 Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Porting notes: 1. ZFSOnLinux had already addressed many of these issues because of its use of -Wall. However, the manner in which they were addressed differed. The illumos fixes replace the ones previously made in ZFSOnLinux to reduce code differences. 2. Part of the upstream patch made a small change to arc.c that might address zfsonlinux/zfs#1334. 3. The initialization of aclsize in zfs_log_create() differs because vsecp is a NULL pointer on ZFSOnLinux. 4. The changes to zfs_register_callbacks() were dropped because it has diverged and needs to be resynced.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Brian Behlendorf
parent
a35beedfb3
commit
a117a6d66e
+6
-2
@@ -3089,7 +3089,7 @@ top:
|
||||
uint64_t size = BP_GET_LSIZE(bp);
|
||||
arc_callback_t *acb;
|
||||
vdev_t *vd = NULL;
|
||||
uint64_t addr = -1;
|
||||
uint64_t addr = 0;
|
||||
boolean_t devw = B_FALSE;
|
||||
|
||||
if (hdr == NULL) {
|
||||
@@ -3210,6 +3210,10 @@ top:
|
||||
cb->l2rcb_flags = zio_flags;
|
||||
cb->l2rcb_compress = hdr->b_l2hdr->b_compress;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(addr >= VDEV_LABEL_START_SIZE &&
|
||||
addr + size < vd->vdev_psize -
|
||||
VDEV_LABEL_END_SIZE);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* l2arc read. The SCL_L2ARC lock will be
|
||||
* released by l2arc_read_done().
|
||||
@@ -3480,8 +3484,8 @@ arc_release(arc_buf_t *buf, void *tag)
|
||||
if (l2hdr) {
|
||||
mutex_enter(&l2arc_buflist_mtx);
|
||||
hdr->b_l2hdr = NULL;
|
||||
buf_size = hdr->b_size;
|
||||
}
|
||||
buf_size = hdr->b_size;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Do we have more than one buf?
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user