Fix double spares for failed vdev

It's possible for two spares to get attached to a single failed vdev.
This happens when you have a failed disk that is spared, and then you
replace the failed disk with a new disk, but during the resilver
the new disk fails, and ZED kicks in a spare for the failed new
disk.  This commit checks for that condition and disallows it.

Reviewed-by: Akash B <akash-b@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <ahamza@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Closes: #16547
Closes: #17231
(cherry picked from commit f40ab9e399)

module/zfs/spa.c

@@ -7430,6 +7430,82 @@ spa_vdev_add(spa_t *spa, nvlist_t *nvroot, boolean_t check_ashift)
 	return (0);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Given a vdev to be replaced and its parent, check for a possible
+ * "double spare" condition if a vdev is to be replaced by a spare.  When this
+ * happens, you can get two spares assigned to one failed vdev.
+ *
+ * To trigger a double spare condition:
+ *
+ * 1. disk1 fails
+ * 2. 1st spare is kicked in for disk1 and it resilvers
+ * 3. Someone replaces disk1 with a new blank disk
+ * 4. New blank disk starts resilvering
+ * 5. While resilvering, new blank disk has IO errors and faults
+ * 6. 2nd spare is kicked in for new blank disk
+ * 7. At this point two spares are kicked in for the original disk1.
+ *
+ * It looks like this:
+ *
+ * NAME                                            STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
+ * tank2                                           DEGRADED     0     0     0
+ *   draid2:6d:10c:2s-0                            DEGRADED     0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d1                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d2                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d3                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d4                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d5                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d6                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d7                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d8                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d9                 ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *     spare-9                                     DEGRADED     0     0     0
+ *       replacing-0                               DEGRADED     0    93     0
+ *         scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d10-part1/old  UNAVAIL      0     0     0
+ *         spare-1                                 DEGRADED     0     0     0
+ *           scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_d10          REMOVED      0     0     0
+ *           draid2-0-0                            ONLINE       0     0     0
+ *       draid2-0-1                                ONLINE       0     0     0
+ * spares
+ *   draid2-0-0                                    INUSE     currently in use
+ *   draid2-0-1                                    INUSE     currently in use
+ *
+ * ARGS:
+ *
+ * newvd:  New spare disk
+ * pvd:    Parent vdev_t the spare should attach to
+ *
+ * This function returns B_TRUE if adding the new vdev would create a double
+ * spare condition, B_FALSE otherwise.
+ */
+static boolean_t
+spa_vdev_new_spare_would_cause_double_spares(vdev_t *newvd, vdev_t *pvd)
+{
+	vdev_t *ppvd;
+
+	ppvd = pvd->vdev_parent;
+	if (ppvd == NULL)
+		return (B_FALSE);
+
+	/*
+	 * To determine if this configuration would cause a double spare, we
+	 * look at the vdev_op of the parent vdev, and of the parent's parent
+	 * vdev.  We also look at vdev_isspare on the new disk.  A double spare
+	 * condition looks like this:
+	 *
+	 * 1. parent of parent's op is a spare or draid spare
+	 * 2. parent's op is replacing
+	 * 3. new disk is a spare
+	 */
+	if ((ppvd->vdev_ops == &vdev_spare_ops) ||
+	    (ppvd->vdev_ops == &vdev_draid_spare_ops))
+		if (pvd->vdev_ops == &vdev_replacing_ops)
+			if (newvd->vdev_isspare)
+				return (B_TRUE);
+
+	return (B_FALSE);
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach a device to a vdev specified by its guid.  The vdev type can be
  * a mirror, a raidz, or a leaf device that is also a top-level (e.g. a
@@ -7604,6 +7680,12 @@ spa_vdev_attach(spa_t *spa, uint64_t guid, nvlist_t *nvroot, int replacing,
 			return (spa_vdev_exit(spa, newrootvd, txg, ENOTSUP));
 		}
 
+		if (spa_vdev_new_spare_would_cause_double_spares(newvd, pvd)) {
+			vdev_dbgmsg(newvd,
+			    "disk would create double spares, ignore.");
+			return (spa_vdev_exit(spa, newrootvd, txg, EEXIST));
+		}
+
 		if (newvd->vdev_isspare)
 			pvops = &vdev_spare_ops;
 		else

tests/runfiles/linux.run

@@ -123,10 +123,10 @@ tags = ['functional', 'fallocate']
 [tests/functional/fault:Linux]
 tests = ['auto_offline_001_pos', 'auto_online_001_pos', 'auto_online_002_pos',
     'auto_replace_001_pos', 'auto_replace_002_pos', 'auto_spare_001_pos',
-    'auto_spare_002_pos', 'auto_spare_multiple', 'auto_spare_ashift',
+    'auto_spare_002_pos', 'auto_spare_double', 'auto_spare_multiple',
-    'auto_spare_shared', 'decrypt_fault', 'decompress_fault',
+    'auto_spare_ashift', 'auto_spare_shared', 'decrypt_fault',
-    'fault_limits', 'scrub_after_resilver', 'suspend_on_probe_errors',
+    'decompress_fault', 'fault_limits', 'scrub_after_resilver',
-    'suspend_resume_single', 'zpool_status_-s']
+    'suspend_on_probe_errors', 'suspend_resume_single', 'zpool_status_-s']
 tags = ['functional', 'fault']
 
 [tests/functional/features/large_dnode:Linux]

tests/zfs-tests/tests/Makefile.am

@@ -1532,6 +1532,7 @@ nobase_dist_datadir_zfs_tests_tests_SCRIPTS += \
 	functional/fault/auto_spare_001_pos.ksh \
 	functional/fault/auto_spare_002_pos.ksh \
 	functional/fault/auto_spare_ashift.ksh \
+	functional/fault/auto_spare_double.ksh \
 	functional/fault/auto_spare_multiple.ksh \
 	functional/fault/auto_spare_shared.ksh \
 	functional/fault/cleanup.ksh \

tests/zfs-tests/tests/functional/fault/auto_spare_double.ksh

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+#!/bin/ksh -p
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: CDDL-1.0
+#
+# CDDL HEADER START
+#
+# This file and its contents are supplied under the terms of the
+# Common Development and Distribution License ("CDDL"), version 1.0.
+# You may only use this file in accordance with the terms of version
+# 1.0 of the CDDL.
+#
+# A full copy of the text of the CDDL should have accompanied this
+# source.  A copy of the CDDL is also available via the Internet at
+# http://www.illumos.org/license/CDDL.
+#
+# CDDL HEADER END
+#
+
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2025 by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC.
+#
+
+# DESCRIPTION:
+# Try do induce a double spare condition and verify we're prevented from doing
+# it.
+#
+# STRATEGY:
+# 1. Fail a drive
+# 2. Kick in first spare
+# 3. Bring new drive back online and start resilvering to it
+# 4. Immediately after the resilver starts, fail the new drive.
+# 5. Try to kick in the second spare for the new drive (which is now failed)
+# 6. Verify that we can't kick in the second spare
+#
+# Repeat this test for both traditional spares and dRAID spares.
+#
+. $STF_SUITE/include/libtest.shlib
+
+LAST_VDEV=3
+SIZE_MB=300
+
+ZED_PID="$(zed_check)"
+
+function cleanup
+{
+	destroy_pool $TESTPOOL
+	for i in {0..$LAST_VDEV} ; do
+		log_must rm -f $TEST_BASE_DIR/file$i
+	done
+
+	# Restore ZED if it was running before this test
+	if [ -n $ZED_PID ] ; then
+		log_must zed_start
+	fi
+}
+
+log_assert "Cannot attach two spares to same failed vdev"
+log_onexit cleanup
+
+# Stop ZED if it's running
+if [ -n $ZED_PID ] ; then
+	log_must zed_stop
+fi
+
+log_must truncate -s ${SIZE_MB}M $TEST_BASE_DIR/file{0..$LAST_VDEV}
+
+ZFS_DBGMSG=/proc/spl/kstat/zfs/dbgmsg
+
+# Run the test - we assume the pool is already created.
+# $1: disk to fail
+# $2: 1st spare name
+# $3: 2nd spare name
+function do_test {
+	FAIL_DRIVE=$1
+	SPARE0=$2
+	SPARE1=$3
+	echo 0 > $ZFS_DBGMSG
+	log_must zpool status
+
+	log_note "Kicking in first spare ($SPARE0)"
+	log_must zpool offline -f $TESTPOOL $FAIL_DRIVE
+	log_must zpool replace $TESTPOOL $FAIL_DRIVE $SPARE0
+
+	# Fill the pool with data to make the resilver take a little
+	# time.
+	dd if=/dev/zero of=/$TESTPOOL/testfile bs=1M || true
+
+	# Zero our failed disk.  It will appear as a blank.
+	rm -f $FAIL_DRIVE
+	truncate -s ${SIZE_MB}M $FAIL_DRIVE
+
+	# Attempt to replace our failed disk, then immediately fault it.
+	log_must zpool replace $TESTPOOL $FAIL_DRIVE
+	log_must zpool offline -f $TESTPOOL $FAIL_DRIVE
+	log_must check_state $TESTPOOL $FAIL_DRIVE "faulted"
+
+	log_note "Kicking in second spare ($SPARE0)... This should not work..."
+	log_mustnot zpool replace $TESTPOOL $FAIL_DRIVE $SPARE1
+	# Verify the debug line in dbgmsg
+	log_must grep 'disk would create double spares' $ZFS_DBGMSG
+
+	# Disk should still be faulted
+	log_must check_state $TESTPOOL $FAIL_DRIVE "faulted"
+}
+
+# Test with traditional spares
+log_must zpool create -O compression=off -O recordsize=4k -O primarycache=none \
+	$TESTPOOL mirror $TEST_BASE_DIR/file{0,1} spare $TEST_BASE_DIR/file{2,3}
+do_test $TEST_BASE_DIR/file1 $TEST_BASE_DIR/file2 $TEST_BASE_DIR/file3
+destroy_pool $TESTPOOL
+
+# Clear vdev files for next test
+for i in {0..$LAST_VDEV} ; do
+	log_must rm -f $TEST_BASE_DIR/file$i
+done
+log_must truncate -s ${SIZE_MB}M $TEST_BASE_DIR/file{0..$LAST_VDEV}
+
+# Test with dRAID spares
+log_must zpool create -O compression=off -O recordsize=4k -O primarycache=none \
+	$TESTPOOL draid1:1d:4c:2s $TEST_BASE_DIR/file{0..3}
+do_test $TEST_BASE_DIR/file1 draid1-0-0 draid1-0-1
+
+log_pass "Verified we cannot attach two spares to same failed vdev"