OpenZFS 7004 - dmu_tx_hold_zap() does dnode_hold() 7x on same object

Using a benchmark which has 32 threads creating 2 million files in the
same directory, on a machine with 16 CPU cores, I observed poor
performance. I noticed that dmu_tx_hold_zap() was using about 30% of
all CPU, and doing dnode_hold() 7 times on the same object (the ZAP
object that is being held).

dmu_tx_hold_zap() keeps a hold on the dnode_t the entire time it is
running, in dmu_tx_hold_t:txh_dnode, so it would be nice to use the
dnode_t that we already have in hand, rather than repeatedly calling
dnode_hold(). To do this, we need to pass the dnode_t down through
all the intermediate calls that dmu_tx_hold_zap() makes, making these
routines take the dnode_t* rather than an objset_t* and a uint64_t
object number. In particular, the following routines will need to have
analogous *_by_dnode() variants created:

dmu_buf_hold_noread()
dmu_buf_hold()
zap_lookup()
zap_lookup_norm()
zap_count_write()
zap_lockdir()
zap_count_write()

This can improve performance on the benchmark described above by 100%,
from 30,000 file creations per second to 60,000. (This improvement is on
top of that provided by working around the object allocation issue. Peak
performance of ~90,000 creations per second was observed with 8 CPUs;
adding CPUs past that decreased performance due to lock contention.) The
CPU used by dmu_tx_hold_zap() was reduced by 88%, from 340 CPU-seconds
to 40 CPU-seconds.

Sponsored by: Intel Corp.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ned Bass <bass6@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>

OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/7004
OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/109
Closes #4641
Closes #4972
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Ahrens
2016-07-20 15:42:13 -07:00
committed by Brian Behlendorf
parent 8bea981504
commit 2bce8049c3
8 changed files with 146 additions and 19 deletions
+48 -3
View File
@@ -536,6 +536,24 @@ zap_lockdir_impl(dmu_buf_t *db, void *tag, dmu_tx_t *tx,
return (0);
}
static int
zap_lockdir_by_dnode(dnode_t *dn, dmu_tx_t *tx,
krw_t lti, boolean_t fatreader, boolean_t adding, void *tag, zap_t **zapp)
{
dmu_buf_t *db;
int err;
err = dmu_buf_hold_by_dnode(dn, 0, tag, &db, DMU_READ_NO_PREFETCH);
if (err != 0) {
return (err);
}
err = zap_lockdir_impl(db, tag, tx, lti, fatreader, adding, zapp);
if (err != 0) {
dmu_buf_rele(db, tag);
}
return (err);
}
int
zap_lockdir(objset_t *os, uint64_t obj, dmu_tx_t *tx,
krw_t lti, boolean_t fatreader, boolean_t adding, void *tag, zap_t **zapp)
@@ -927,6 +945,33 @@ zap_prefetch(objset_t *os, uint64_t zapobj, const char *name)
return (err);
}
int
zap_lookup_by_dnode(dnode_t *dn, const char *name,
uint64_t integer_size, uint64_t num_integers, void *buf)
{
return (zap_lookup_norm_by_dnode(dn, name, integer_size,
num_integers, buf, MT_EXACT, NULL, 0, NULL));
}
int
zap_lookup_norm_by_dnode(dnode_t *dn, const char *name,
uint64_t integer_size, uint64_t num_integers, void *buf,
matchtype_t mt, char *realname, int rn_len,
boolean_t *ncp)
{
zap_t *zap;
int err;
err = zap_lockdir_by_dnode(dn, NULL, RW_READER, TRUE, FALSE,
FTAG, &zap);
if (err != 0)
return (err);
err = zap_lookup_impl(zap, name, integer_size,
num_integers, buf, mt, realname, rn_len, ncp);
zap_unlockdir(zap, FTAG);
return (err);
}
int
zap_prefetch_uint64(objset_t *os, uint64_t zapobj, const uint64_t *key,
int key_numints)
@@ -1460,7 +1505,7 @@ zap_get_stats(objset_t *os, uint64_t zapobj, zap_stats_t *zs)
}
int
zap_count_write(objset_t *os, uint64_t zapobj, const char *name, int add,
zap_count_write_by_dnode(dnode_t *dn, const char *name, int add,
uint64_t *towrite, uint64_t *tooverwrite)
{
zap_t *zap;
@@ -1488,7 +1533,7 @@ zap_count_write(objset_t *os, uint64_t zapobj, const char *name, int add,
* At present we are just evaluating the possibility of this operation
* and hence we do not want to trigger an upgrade.
*/
err = zap_lockdir(os, zapobj, NULL, RW_READER, TRUE, FALSE,
err = zap_lockdir_by_dnode(dn, NULL, RW_READER, TRUE, FALSE,
FTAG, &zap);
if (err != 0)
return (err);
@@ -1552,7 +1597,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_lookup_uint64);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_contains);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_prefetch);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_prefetch_uint64);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_count_write);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_count_write_by_dnode);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_add);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_add_uint64);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zap_update);