mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_zfs.git
synced 2024-12-26 03:09:34 +03:00
OpenZFS 8603 - rename zilog's "zl_writer_lock" to "zl_issuer_lock"
This is a purely cosmetic change. The zilog's "zl_writer_lock" field is being renamed to "zl_issuer_lock" to try and make the code easier to understand; no other changes are made. Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: C Fraire <cfraire@me.com> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Ported-by: Giuseppe Di Natale <dinatale2@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8603 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/2daf06546b Closes #6927
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c415a93d2
commit
1b2b0acab5
@ -56,9 +56,9 @@ typedef enum {
|
||||
* Log write block (lwb)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Prior to an lwb being issued to disk via zil_lwb_write_issue(), it
|
||||
* will be protected by the zilog's "zl_writer_lock". Basically, prior
|
||||
* will be protected by the zilog's "zl_issuer_lock". Basically, prior
|
||||
* to it being issued, it will only be accessed by the thread that's
|
||||
* holding the "zl_writer_lock". After the lwb is issued, the zilog's
|
||||
* holding the "zl_issuer_lock". After the lwb is issued, the zilog's
|
||||
* "zl_lock" is used to protect the lwb against concurrent access.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
typedef struct lwb {
|
||||
@ -92,10 +92,10 @@ typedef struct lwb {
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The "zcw_lock" field is used to protect the commit waiter against
|
||||
* concurrent access. This lock is often acquired while already holding
|
||||
* the zilog's "zl_writer_lock" or "zl_lock"; see the functions
|
||||
* the zilog's "zl_issuer_lock" or "zl_lock"; see the functions
|
||||
* zil_process_commit_list() and zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done() as examples
|
||||
* of this. Thus, one must be careful not to acquire the
|
||||
* "zl_writer_lock" or "zl_lock" when already holding the "zcw_lock";
|
||||
* "zl_issuer_lock" or "zl_lock" when already holding the "zcw_lock";
|
||||
* e.g. see the zil_commit_waiter_timeout() function.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
typedef struct zil_commit_waiter {
|
||||
@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ struct zilog {
|
||||
uint8_t zl_keep_first; /* keep first log block in destroy */
|
||||
uint8_t zl_replay; /* replaying records while set */
|
||||
uint8_t zl_stop_sync; /* for debugging */
|
||||
kmutex_t zl_writer_lock; /* single writer, per ZIL, at a time */
|
||||
kmutex_t zl_issuer_lock; /* single writer, per ZIL, at a time */
|
||||
uint8_t zl_logbias; /* latency or throughput */
|
||||
uint8_t zl_sync; /* synchronous or asynchronous */
|
||||
int zl_parse_error; /* last zil_parse() error */
|
||||
|
@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ zil_lwb_write_open(zilog_t *zilog, lwb_t *lwb)
|
||||
zbookmark_phys_t zb;
|
||||
zio_priority_t prio;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT3P(lwb, !=, NULL);
|
||||
EQUIV(lwb->lwb_root_zio == NULL, lwb->lwb_state == LWB_STATE_CLOSED);
|
||||
EQUIV(lwb->lwb_root_zio != NULL, lwb->lwb_state == LWB_STATE_OPENED);
|
||||
@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ zil_lwb_write_issue(zilog_t *zilog, lwb_t *lwb)
|
||||
int i, error;
|
||||
boolean_t slog;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT3P(lwb->lwb_root_zio, !=, NULL);
|
||||
ASSERT3P(lwb->lwb_write_zio, !=, NULL);
|
||||
ASSERT3S(lwb->lwb_state, ==, LWB_STATE_OPENED);
|
||||
@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ zil_lwb_commit(zilog_t *zilog, itx_t *itx, lwb_t *lwb)
|
||||
char *lr_buf;
|
||||
uint64_t dlen, dnow, lwb_sp, reclen, txg;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT3P(lwb, !=, NULL);
|
||||
ASSERT3P(lwb->lwb_buf, !=, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1837,7 +1837,7 @@ zil_get_commit_list(zilog_t *zilog)
|
||||
uint64_t otxg, txg;
|
||||
list_t *commit_list = &zilog->zl_itx_commit_list;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
|
||||
if (spa_freeze_txg(zilog->zl_spa) != UINT64_MAX) /* ziltest support */
|
||||
otxg = ZILTEST_TXG;
|
||||
@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ zil_prune_commit_list(zilog_t *zilog)
|
||||
{
|
||||
itx_t *itx;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
|
||||
while ((itx = list_head(&zilog->zl_itx_commit_list)) != NULL) {
|
||||
lr_t *lrc = &itx->itx_lr;
|
||||
@ -1994,12 +1994,12 @@ zil_commit_writer_stall(zilog_t *zilog)
|
||||
* crash (because the previous lwb on-disk would not point to
|
||||
* it).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We must hold the zilog's zl_writer_lock while we do this, to
|
||||
* We must hold the zilog's zl_issuer_lock while we do this, to
|
||||
* ensure no new threads enter zil_process_commit_list() until
|
||||
* all lwb's in the zl_lwb_list have been synced and freed
|
||||
* (which is achieved via the txg_wait_synced() call).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
txg_wait_synced(zilog->zl_dmu_pool, 0);
|
||||
ASSERT3P(list_tail(&zilog->zl_lwb_list), ==, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ zil_process_commit_list(zilog_t *zilog)
|
||||
lwb_t *lwb;
|
||||
itx_t *itx;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Return if there's nothing to commit before we dirty the fs by
|
||||
@ -2207,17 +2207,17 @@ zil_commit_writer(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
ASSERT(spa_writeable(zilog->zl_spa));
|
||||
ASSERT0(zilog->zl_suspend);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_enter(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
|
||||
mutex_enter(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (zcw->zcw_lwb != NULL || zcw->zcw_done) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It's possible that, while we were waiting to acquire
|
||||
* the "zl_writer_lock", another thread committed this
|
||||
* the "zl_issuer_lock", another thread committed this
|
||||
* waiter to an lwb. If that occurs, we bail out early,
|
||||
* without processing any of the zilog's queue of itxs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* On certain workloads and system configurations, the
|
||||
* "zl_writer_lock" can become highly contended. In an
|
||||
* "zl_issuer_lock" can become highly contended. In an
|
||||
* attempt to reduce this contention, we immediately drop
|
||||
* the lock if the waiter has already been processed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -2236,13 +2236,13 @@ zil_commit_writer(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
zil_process_commit_list(zilog);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
mutex_exit(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zcw->zcw_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT3B(zcw->zcw_done, ==, B_FALSE);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2254,7 +2254,7 @@ zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
* If the lwb has already been issued by another thread, we can
|
||||
* immediately return since there's no work to be done (the
|
||||
* point of this function is to issue the lwb). Additionally, we
|
||||
* do this prior to acquiring the zl_writer_lock, to avoid
|
||||
* do this prior to acquiring the zl_issuer_lock, to avoid
|
||||
* acquiring it when it's not necessary to do so.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (lwb->lwb_state == LWB_STATE_ISSUED ||
|
||||
@ -2263,13 +2263,13 @@ zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In order to call zil_lwb_write_issue() we must hold the
|
||||
* zilog's "zl_writer_lock". We can't simply acquire that lock,
|
||||
* zilog's "zl_issuer_lock". We can't simply acquire that lock,
|
||||
* since we're already holding the commit waiter's "zcw_lock",
|
||||
* and those two locks are aquired in the opposite order
|
||||
* elsewhere.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_exit(&zcw->zcw_lock);
|
||||
mutex_enter(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
|
||||
mutex_enter(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
|
||||
mutex_enter(&zcw->zcw_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've already checked this above, but since we hadn't
|
||||
* acquired the zilog's zl_writer_lock, we have to perform this
|
||||
* acquired the zilog's zl_issuer_lock, we have to perform this
|
||||
* check a second time while holding the lock. We can't call
|
||||
* zil_lwb_write_issue() if the lwb had already been issued.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
mutex_exit(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
|
||||
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zcw->zcw_lock));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2377,7 +2377,7 @@ static void
|
||||
zil_commit_waiter(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
|
||||
ASSERT(spa_writeable(zilog->zl_spa));
|
||||
ASSERT0(zilog->zl_suspend);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ zil_commit_itx_assign(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
|
||||
* on two fundamental concepts:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1. The creation and issuance of lwb zio's is protected by
|
||||
* the zilog's "zl_writer_lock", which ensures only a single
|
||||
* the zilog's "zl_issuer_lock", which ensures only a single
|
||||
* thread is creating and/or issuing lwb's at a time
|
||||
* 2. The "previous" lwb is a child of the "current" lwb
|
||||
* (leveraging the zio parent-child depenency graph)
|
||||
@ -2906,7 +2906,7 @@ zil_alloc(objset_t *os, zil_header_t *zh_phys)
|
||||
zilog->zl_last_lwb_latency = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_init(&zilog->zl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
|
||||
mutex_init(&zilog->zl_writer_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
|
||||
mutex_init(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < TXG_SIZE; i++) {
|
||||
mutex_init(&zilog->zl_itxg[i].itxg_lock, NULL,
|
||||
@ -2953,7 +2953,7 @@ zil_free(zilog_t *zilog)
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&zilog->zl_itxg[i].itxg_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&zilog->zl_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
cv_destroy(&zilog->zl_cv_suspend);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user