mirror_zfs/module/zfs/zfs_rlock.c

692 lines
20 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License (the "License").
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
*
* You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
* or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions
* and limitations under the License.
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
* If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
* fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying
* information: Portions Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
/*
* Copyright 2010 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
* Use is subject to license terms.
*/
/*
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* Copyright (c) 2012, 2018 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
*/
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* This file contains the code to implement file range locking in
* ZFS, although there isn't much specific to ZFS (all that comes to mind is
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
* support for growing the blocksize).
*
* Interface
* ---------
* Defined in zfs_rlock.h but essentially:
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* lr = rangelock_enter(zp, off, len, lock_type);
* rangelock_reduce(lr, off, len); // optional
* rangelock_exit(lr);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*
* Range locking rules
* --------------------
* 1. When truncating a file (zfs_create, zfs_setattr, zfs_space) the whole
* file range needs to be locked as RL_WRITER. Only then can the pages be
* freed etc and zp_size reset. zp_size must be set within range lock.
* 2. For writes and punching holes (zfs_write & zfs_space) just the range
* being written or freed needs to be locked as RL_WRITER.
* Multiple writes at the end of the file must coordinate zp_size updates
* to ensure data isn't lost. A compare and swap loop is currently used
* to ensure the file size is at least the offset last written.
* 3. For reads (zfs_read, zfs_get_data & zfs_putapage) just the range being
* read needs to be locked as RL_READER. A check against zp_size can then
* be made for reading beyond end of file.
*
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
* AVL tree
* --------
* An AVL tree is used to maintain the state of the existing ranges
* that are locked for exclusive (writer) or shared (reader) use.
* The starting range offset is used for searching and sorting the tree.
*
* Common case
* -----------
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* The (hopefully) usual case is of no overlaps or contention for locks. On
* entry to rangelock_enter(), a locked_range_t is allocated; the tree
* searched that finds no overlap, and *this* locked_range_t is placed in the
* tree.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*
* Overlaps/Reference counting/Proxy locks
* ---------------------------------------
* The avl code only allows one node at a particular offset. Also it's very
* inefficient to search through all previous entries looking for overlaps
* (because the very 1st in the ordered list might be at offset 0 but
* cover the whole file).
* So this implementation uses reference counts and proxy range locks.
* Firstly, only reader locks use reference counts and proxy locks,
* because writer locks are exclusive.
* When a reader lock overlaps with another then a proxy lock is created
* for that range and replaces the original lock. If the overlap
* is exact then the reference count of the proxy is simply incremented.
* Otherwise, the proxy lock is split into smaller lock ranges and
* new proxy locks created for non overlapping ranges.
* The reference counts are adjusted accordingly.
* Meanwhile, the original lock is kept around (this is the callers handle)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
* and its offset and length are used when releasing the lock.
*
* Thread coordination
* -------------------
* In order to make wakeups efficient and to ensure multiple continuous
* readers on a range don't starve a writer for the same range lock,
* two condition variables are allocated in each rl_t.
* If a writer (or reader) can't get a range it initialises the writer
* (or reader) cv; sets a flag saying there's a writer (or reader) waiting;
* and waits on that cv. When a thread unlocks that range it wakes up all
* writers then all readers before destroying the lock.
*
* Append mode writes
* ------------------
* Append mode writes need to lock a range at the end of a file.
* The offset of the end of the file is determined under the
* range locking mutex, and the lock type converted from RL_APPEND to
* RL_WRITER and the range locked.
*
* Grow block handling
* -------------------
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* ZFS supports multiple block sizes, up to 16MB. The smallest
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
* block size is used for the file which is grown as needed. During this
* growth all other writers and readers must be excluded.
* So if the block size needs to be grown then the whole file is
* exclusively locked, then later the caller will reduce the lock
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* range to just the range to be written using rangelock_reduce().
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
#include <sys/zfs_context.h>
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
#include <sys/zfs_rlock.h>
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
/*
* AVL comparison function used to order range locks
* Locks are ordered on the start offset of the range.
*/
static int
zfs_rangelock_compare(const void *arg1, const void *arg2)
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
{
const zfs_locked_range_t *rl1 = (const zfs_locked_range_t *)arg1;
const zfs_locked_range_t *rl2 = (const zfs_locked_range_t *)arg2;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
Reduce loaded range tree memory usage This patch implements a new tree structure for ZFS, and uses it to store range trees more efficiently. The new structure is approximately a B-tree, though there are some small differences from the usual characterizations. The tree has core nodes and leaf nodes; each contain data elements, which the elements in the core nodes acting as separators between its children. The difference between core and leaf nodes is that the core nodes have an array of children, while leaf nodes don't. Every node in the tree may be only partially full; in most cases, they are all at least 50% full (in terms of element count) except for the root node, which can be less full. Underfull nodes will steal from their neighbors or merge to remain full enough, while overfull nodes will split in two. The data elements are contained in tree-controlled buffers; they are copied into these on insertion, and overwritten on deletion. This means that the elements are not independently allocated, which reduces overhead, but also means they can't be shared between trees (and also that pointers to them are only valid until a side-effectful tree operation occurs). The overhead varies based on how dense the tree is, but is usually on the order of about 50% of the element size; the per-node overheads are very small, and so don't make a significant difference. The trees can accept arbitrary records; they accept a size and a comparator to allow them to be used for a variety of purposes. The new trees replace the AVL trees used in the range trees today. Currently, the range_seg_t structure contains three 8 byte integers of payload and two 24 byte avl_tree_node_ts to handle its storage in both an offset-sorted tree and a size-sorted tree (total size: 64 bytes). In the new model, the range seg structures are usually two 4 byte integers, but a separate one needs to exist for the size-sorted and offset-sorted tree. Between the raw size, the 50% overhead, and the double storage, the new btrees are expected to use 8*1.5*2 = 24 bytes per record, or 33.3% as much memory as the AVL trees (this is for the purposes of storing metaslab range trees; for other purposes, like scrubs, they use ~50% as much memory). We reduced the size of the payload in the range segments by teaching range trees about starting offsets and shifts; since metaslabs have a fixed starting offset, and they all operate in terms of disk sectors, we can store the ranges using 4-byte integers as long as the size of the metaslab divided by the sector size is less than 2^32. For 512-byte sectors, this is a 2^41 (or 2TB) metaslab, which with the default settings corresponds to a 256PB disk. 4k sector disks can handle metaslabs up to 2^46 bytes, or 2^63 byte disks. Since we do not anticipate disks of this size in the near future, there should be almost no cases where metaslabs need 64-byte integers to store their ranges. We do still have the capability to store 64-byte integer ranges to account for cases where we are storing per-vdev (or per-dnode) trees, which could reasonably go above the limits discussed. We also do not store fill information in the compact version of the node, since it is only used for sorted scrub. We also optimized the metaslab loading process in various other ways to offset some inefficiencies in the btree model. While individual operations (find, insert, remove_from) are faster for the btree than they are for the avl tree, remove usually requires a find operation, while in the AVL tree model the element itself suffices. Some clever changes actually caused an overall speedup in metaslab loading; we use approximately 40% less cpu to load metaslabs in our tests on Illumos. Another memory and performance optimization was achieved by changing what is stored in the size-sorted trees. When a disk is heavily fragmented, the df algorithm used by default in ZFS will almost always find a number of small regions in its initial cursor-based search; it will usually only fall back to the size-sorted tree to find larger regions. If we increase the size of the cursor-based search slightly, and don't store segments that are smaller than a tunable size floor in the size-sorted tree, we can further cut memory usage down to below 20% of what the AVL trees store. This also results in further reductions in CPU time spent loading metaslabs. The 16KiB size floor was chosen because it results in substantial memory usage reduction while not usually resulting in situations where we can't find an appropriate chunk with the cursor and are forced to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree. In addition, even if we do have to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree, the chunk would be too small to use for ZIL allocations, so it isn't as big of a loss as it might otherwise be. And often, more small allocations will follow the initial one, and the cursor search will now find the remainder of the chunk we didn't use all of and use it for subsequent allocations. Practical testing has shown little or no change in fragmentation as a result of this change. If the size-sorted tree becomes empty while the offset sorted one still has entries, it will load all the entries from the offset sorted tree and disregard the size floor until it is unloaded again. This operation occurs rarely with the default setting, only on incredibly thoroughly fragmented pools. There are some other small changes to zdb to teach it to handle btrees, but nothing major. Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy seb@delphix.com Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #9181
2019-10-09 20:36:03 +03:00
return (TREE_CMP(rl1->lr_offset, rl2->lr_offset));
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
}
/*
* The callback is invoked when acquiring a RL_WRITER or RL_APPEND lock.
* It must convert RL_APPEND to RL_WRITER (starting at the end of the file),
* and may increase the range that's locked for RL_WRITER.
*/
void
zfs_rangelock_init(zfs_rangelock_t *rl, zfs_rangelock_cb_t *cb, void *arg)
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
{
mutex_init(&rl->rl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
avl_create(&rl->rl_tree, zfs_rangelock_compare,
sizeof (zfs_locked_range_t), offsetof(zfs_locked_range_t, lr_node));
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
rl->rl_cb = cb;
rl->rl_arg = arg;
}
void
zfs_rangelock_fini(zfs_rangelock_t *rl)
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
{
mutex_destroy(&rl->rl_lock);
avl_destroy(&rl->rl_tree);
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Check if a write lock can be grabbed. If not, fail immediately or sleep and
* recheck until available, depending on the value of the "nonblock" parameter.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
static boolean_t
zfs_rangelock_enter_writer(zfs_rangelock_t *rl, zfs_locked_range_t *new,
boolean_t nonblock)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
avl_tree_t *tree = &rl->rl_tree;
zfs_locked_range_t *lr;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
avl_index_t where;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
uint64_t orig_off = new->lr_offset;
uint64_t orig_len = new->lr_length;
zfs_rangelock_type_t orig_type = new->lr_type;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
for (;;) {
/*
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* Call callback which can modify new->r_off,len,type.
* Note, the callback is used by the ZPL to handle appending
* and changing blocksizes. It isn't needed for zvols.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (rl->rl_cb != NULL) {
rl->rl_cb(new, rl->rl_arg);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
/*
* If the type was APPEND, the callback must convert it to
* WRITER.
*/
ASSERT3U(new->lr_type, ==, RL_WRITER);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* First check for the usual case of no locks
*/
if (avl_numnodes(tree) == 0) {
avl_add(tree, new);
return (B_TRUE);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/*
* Look for any locks in the range.
*/
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
lr = avl_find(tree, new, &where);
if (lr != NULL)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
goto wait; /* already locked at same offset */
lr = avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_AFTER);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (lr != NULL &&
lr->lr_offset < new->lr_offset + new->lr_length)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
goto wait;
lr = avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_BEFORE);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (lr != NULL &&
lr->lr_offset + lr->lr_length > new->lr_offset)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
goto wait;
avl_insert(tree, new, where);
return (B_TRUE);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
wait:
if (nonblock)
return (B_FALSE);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (!lr->lr_write_wanted) {
cv_init(&lr->lr_write_cv, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
lr->lr_write_wanted = B_TRUE;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
cv_wait(&lr->lr_write_cv, &rl->rl_lock);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* reset to original */
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
new->lr_offset = orig_off;
new->lr_length = orig_len;
new->lr_type = orig_type;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
}
/*
* If this is an original (non-proxy) lock then replace it by
* a proxy and return the proxy.
*/
static zfs_locked_range_t *
zfs_rangelock_proxify(avl_tree_t *tree, zfs_locked_range_t *lr)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
zfs_locked_range_t *proxy;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (lr->lr_proxy)
return (lr); /* already a proxy */
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_count, ==, 1);
ASSERT(lr->lr_write_wanted == B_FALSE);
ASSERT(lr->lr_read_wanted == B_FALSE);
avl_remove(tree, lr);
lr->lr_count = 0;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* create a proxy range lock */
proxy = kmem_alloc(sizeof (zfs_locked_range_t), KM_SLEEP);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
proxy->lr_offset = lr->lr_offset;
proxy->lr_length = lr->lr_length;
proxy->lr_count = 1;
proxy->lr_type = RL_READER;
proxy->lr_proxy = B_TRUE;
proxy->lr_write_wanted = B_FALSE;
proxy->lr_read_wanted = B_FALSE;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
avl_add(tree, proxy);
return (proxy);
}
/*
* Split the range lock at the supplied offset
* returning the *front* proxy.
*/
static zfs_locked_range_t *
zfs_rangelock_split(avl_tree_t *tree, zfs_locked_range_t *lr, uint64_t off)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
zfs_locked_range_t *rear;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_length, >, 1);
ASSERT3U(off, >, lr->lr_offset);
ASSERT3U(off, <, lr->lr_offset + lr->lr_length);
ASSERT(lr->lr_write_wanted == B_FALSE);
ASSERT(lr->lr_read_wanted == B_FALSE);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* create the rear proxy range lock */
rear = kmem_alloc(sizeof (zfs_locked_range_t), KM_SLEEP);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
rear->lr_offset = off;
rear->lr_length = lr->lr_offset + lr->lr_length - off;
rear->lr_count = lr->lr_count;
rear->lr_type = RL_READER;
rear->lr_proxy = B_TRUE;
rear->lr_write_wanted = B_FALSE;
rear->lr_read_wanted = B_FALSE;
zfs_locked_range_t *front = zfs_rangelock_proxify(tree, lr);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
front->lr_length = off - lr->lr_offset;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
avl_insert_here(tree, rear, front, AVL_AFTER);
return (front);
}
/*
* Create and add a new proxy range lock for the supplied range.
*/
static void
zfs_rangelock_new_proxy(avl_tree_t *tree, uint64_t off, uint64_t len)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
zfs_locked_range_t *lr;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT(len != 0);
lr = kmem_alloc(sizeof (zfs_locked_range_t), KM_SLEEP);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
lr->lr_offset = off;
lr->lr_length = len;
lr->lr_count = 1;
lr->lr_type = RL_READER;
lr->lr_proxy = B_TRUE;
lr->lr_write_wanted = B_FALSE;
lr->lr_read_wanted = B_FALSE;
avl_add(tree, lr);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
static void
zfs_rangelock_add_reader(avl_tree_t *tree, zfs_locked_range_t *new,
zfs_locked_range_t *prev, avl_index_t where)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
zfs_locked_range_t *next;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
uint64_t off = new->lr_offset;
uint64_t len = new->lr_length;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* prev arrives either:
* - pointing to an entry at the same offset
* - pointing to the entry with the closest previous offset whose
* range may overlap with the new range
* - null, if there were no ranges starting before the new one
*/
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (prev != NULL) {
if (prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length <= off) {
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
prev = NULL;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
} else if (prev->lr_offset != off) {
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* convert to proxy if needed then
* split this entry and bump ref count
*/
prev = zfs_rangelock_split(tree, prev, off);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
prev = AVL_NEXT(tree, prev); /* move to rear range */
}
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT((prev == NULL) || (prev->lr_offset == off));
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (prev != NULL)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
next = prev;
else
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
next = avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_AFTER);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (next == NULL || off + len <= next->lr_offset) {
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* no overlaps, use the original new rl_t in the tree */
avl_insert(tree, new, where);
return;
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (off < next->lr_offset) {
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* Add a proxy for initial range before the overlap */
zfs_rangelock_new_proxy(tree, off, next->lr_offset - off);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
new->lr_count = 0; /* will use proxies in tree */
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* We now search forward through the ranges, until we go past the end
* of the new range. For each entry we make it a proxy if it
* isn't already, then bump its reference count. If there's any
* gaps between the ranges then we create a new proxy range.
*/
for (prev = NULL; next; prev = next, next = AVL_NEXT(tree, next)) {
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (off + len <= next->lr_offset)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
break;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (prev != NULL && prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length <
next->lr_offset) {
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* there's a gap */
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT3U(next->lr_offset, >,
prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length);
zfs_rangelock_new_proxy(tree,
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length,
next->lr_offset -
(prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length));
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (off + len == next->lr_offset + next->lr_length) {
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* exact overlap with end */
next = zfs_rangelock_proxify(tree, next);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
next->lr_count++;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return;
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (off + len < next->lr_offset + next->lr_length) {
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* new range ends in the middle of this block */
next = zfs_rangelock_split(tree, next, off + len);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
next->lr_count++;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return;
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT3U(off + len, >, next->lr_offset + next->lr_length);
next = zfs_rangelock_proxify(tree, next);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
next->lr_count++;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/* Add the remaining end range. */
zfs_rangelock_new_proxy(tree, prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length,
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
(off + len) - (prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length));
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/*
* Check if a reader lock can be grabbed. If not, fail immediately or sleep and
* recheck until available, depending on the value of the "nonblock" parameter.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
static boolean_t
zfs_rangelock_enter_reader(zfs_rangelock_t *rl, zfs_locked_range_t *new,
boolean_t nonblock)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
avl_tree_t *tree = &rl->rl_tree;
zfs_locked_range_t *prev, *next;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
avl_index_t where;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
uint64_t off = new->lr_offset;
uint64_t len = new->lr_length;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Look for any writer locks in the range.
*/
retry:
prev = avl_find(tree, new, &where);
if (prev == NULL)
prev = avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_BEFORE);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Check the previous range for a writer lock overlap.
*/
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (prev && (off < prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length)) {
if ((prev->lr_type == RL_WRITER) || (prev->lr_write_wanted)) {
if (nonblock)
return (B_FALSE);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (!prev->lr_read_wanted) {
cv_init(&prev->lr_read_cv,
NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
prev->lr_read_wanted = B_TRUE;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
cv_wait(&prev->lr_read_cv, &rl->rl_lock);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
goto retry;
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (off + len < prev->lr_offset + prev->lr_length)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
goto got_lock;
}
/*
* Search through the following ranges to see if there's
* write lock any overlap.
*/
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (prev != NULL)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
next = AVL_NEXT(tree, prev);
else
next = avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_AFTER);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
for (; next != NULL; next = AVL_NEXT(tree, next)) {
if (off + len <= next->lr_offset)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
goto got_lock;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if ((next->lr_type == RL_WRITER) || (next->lr_write_wanted)) {
if (nonblock)
return (B_FALSE);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (!next->lr_read_wanted) {
cv_init(&next->lr_read_cv,
NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
next->lr_read_wanted = B_TRUE;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
cv_wait(&next->lr_read_cv, &rl->rl_lock);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
goto retry;
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (off + len <= next->lr_offset + next->lr_length)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
goto got_lock;
}
got_lock:
/*
* Add the read lock, which may involve splitting existing
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* locks and bumping ref counts (r_count).
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
zfs_rangelock_add_reader(tree, new, prev, where);
return (B_TRUE);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/*
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* Lock a range (offset, length) as either shared (RL_READER) or exclusive
* (RL_WRITER or RL_APPEND). If RL_APPEND is specified, rl_cb() will convert
* it to a RL_WRITER lock (with the offset at the end of the file). Returns
* the range lock structure for later unlocking (or reduce range if the
* entire file is locked as RL_WRITER), or NULL if nonblock is true and the
* lock could not be acquired immediately.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
static zfs_locked_range_t *
zfs_rangelock_enter_impl(zfs_rangelock_t *rl, uint64_t off, uint64_t len,
zfs_rangelock_type_t type, boolean_t nonblock)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
zfs_locked_range_t *new;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
ASSERT(type == RL_READER || type == RL_WRITER || type == RL_APPEND);
new = kmem_alloc(sizeof (zfs_locked_range_t), KM_SLEEP);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
new->lr_rangelock = rl;
new->lr_offset = off;
2009-02-18 23:51:31 +03:00
if (len + off < off) /* overflow */
len = UINT64_MAX - off;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
new->lr_length = len;
new->lr_count = 1; /* assume it's going to be in the tree */
new->lr_type = type;
new->lr_proxy = B_FALSE;
new->lr_write_wanted = B_FALSE;
new->lr_read_wanted = B_FALSE;
mutex_enter(&rl->rl_lock);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
if (type == RL_READER) {
/*
* First check for the usual case of no locks
*/
if (avl_numnodes(&rl->rl_tree) == 0) {
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
avl_add(&rl->rl_tree, new);
} else if (!zfs_rangelock_enter_reader(rl, new, nonblock)) {
kmem_free(new, sizeof (*new));
new = NULL;
}
} else if (!zfs_rangelock_enter_writer(rl, new, nonblock)) {
kmem_free(new, sizeof (*new));
new = NULL;
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
mutex_exit(&rl->rl_lock);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (new);
}
zfs_locked_range_t *
zfs_rangelock_enter(zfs_rangelock_t *rl, uint64_t off, uint64_t len,
zfs_rangelock_type_t type)
{
return (zfs_rangelock_enter_impl(rl, off, len, type, B_FALSE));
}
zfs_locked_range_t *
zfs_rangelock_tryenter(zfs_rangelock_t *rl, uint64_t off, uint64_t len,
zfs_rangelock_type_t type)
{
return (zfs_rangelock_enter_impl(rl, off, len, type, B_TRUE));
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
/*
* Safely free the zfs_locked_range_t.
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
*/
static void
zfs_rangelock_free(zfs_locked_range_t *lr)
{
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (lr->lr_write_wanted)
cv_destroy(&lr->lr_write_cv);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (lr->lr_read_wanted)
cv_destroy(&lr->lr_read_cv);
kmem_free(lr, sizeof (zfs_locked_range_t));
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Unlock a reader lock
*/
static void
zfs_rangelock_exit_reader(zfs_rangelock_t *rl, zfs_locked_range_t *remove,
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
list_t *free_list)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
avl_tree_t *tree = &rl->rl_tree;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
uint64_t len;
/*
* The common case is when the remove entry is in the tree
* (cnt == 1) meaning there's been no other reader locks overlapping
* with this one. Otherwise the remove entry will have been
* removed from the tree and replaced by proxies (one or
* more ranges mapping to the entire range).
*/
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (remove->lr_count == 1) {
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
avl_remove(tree, remove);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
if (remove->lr_write_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&remove->lr_write_cv);
if (remove->lr_read_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&remove->lr_read_cv);
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 23:17:35 +03:00
list_insert_tail(free_list, remove);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
} else {
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT0(remove->lr_count);
ASSERT0(remove->lr_write_wanted);
ASSERT0(remove->lr_read_wanted);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Find start proxy representing this reader lock,
* then decrement ref count on all proxies
* that make up this range, freeing them as needed.
*/
zfs_locked_range_t *lr = avl_find(tree, remove, NULL);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT3P(lr, !=, NULL);
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_count, !=, 0);
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_type, ==, RL_READER);
zfs_locked_range_t *next = NULL;
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
for (len = remove->lr_length; len != 0; lr = next) {
len -= lr->lr_length;
if (len != 0) {
next = AVL_NEXT(tree, lr);
ASSERT3P(next, !=, NULL);
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_offset + lr->lr_length, ==,
next->lr_offset);
ASSERT3U(next->lr_count, !=, 0);
ASSERT3U(next->lr_type, ==, RL_READER);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
lr->lr_count--;
if (lr->lr_count == 0) {
avl_remove(tree, lr);
if (lr->lr_write_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&lr->lr_write_cv);
if (lr->lr_read_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&lr->lr_read_cv);
list_insert_tail(free_list, lr);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
}
kmem_free(remove, sizeof (zfs_locked_range_t));
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
}
/*
* Unlock range and destroy range lock structure.
*/
void
zfs_rangelock_exit(zfs_locked_range_t *lr)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
zfs_rangelock_t *rl = lr->lr_rangelock;
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 23:17:35 +03:00
list_t free_list;
zfs_locked_range_t *free_lr;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT(lr->lr_type == RL_WRITER || lr->lr_type == RL_READER);
ASSERT(lr->lr_count == 1 || lr->lr_count == 0);
ASSERT(!lr->lr_proxy);
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
/*
* The free list is used to defer the cv_destroy() and
* subsequent kmem_free until after the mutex is dropped.
*/
list_create(&free_list, sizeof (zfs_locked_range_t),
offsetof(zfs_locked_range_t, lr_node));
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
mutex_enter(&rl->rl_lock);
if (lr->lr_type == RL_WRITER) {
/* writer locks can't be shared or split */
avl_remove(&rl->rl_tree, lr);
if (lr->lr_write_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&lr->lr_write_cv);
if (lr->lr_read_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&lr->lr_read_cv);
list_insert_tail(&free_list, lr);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
} else {
/*
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* lock may be shared, let rangelock_exit_reader()
* release the lock and free the zfs_locked_range_t.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
zfs_rangelock_exit_reader(rl, lr, &free_list);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
mutex_exit(&rl->rl_lock);
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 23:17:35 +03:00
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
while ((free_lr = list_remove_head(&free_list)) != NULL)
zfs_rangelock_free(free_lr);
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 23:17:35 +03:00
list_destroy(&free_list);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/*
* Reduce range locked as RL_WRITER from whole file to specified range.
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
* Asserts the whole file is exclusively locked and so there's only one
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
* entry in the tree.
*/
void
zfs_rangelock_reduce(zfs_locked_range_t *lr, uint64_t off, uint64_t len)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
zfs_rangelock_t *rl = lr->lr_rangelock;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/* Ensure there are no other locks */
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
ASSERT3U(avl_numnodes(&rl->rl_tree), ==, 1);
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_offset, ==, 0);
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_type, ==, RL_WRITER);
ASSERT(!lr->lr_proxy);
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_length, ==, UINT64_MAX);
ASSERT3U(lr->lr_count, ==, 1);
mutex_enter(&rl->rl_lock);
lr->lr_offset = off;
lr->lr_length = len;
mutex_exit(&rl->rl_lock);
if (lr->lr_write_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&lr->lr_write_cv);
if (lr->lr_read_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&lr->lr_read_cv);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
OpenZFS 9689 - zfs range lock code should not be zpl-specific The ZFS range locking code in zfs_rlock.c/h depends on ZPL-specific data structures, specifically znode_t. However, it's also used by the ZVOL code, which uses a "dummy" znode_t to pass to the range locking code. We should clean this up so that the range locking code is generic and can be used equally by ZPL and ZVOL, and also can be used by future consumers that may need to run in userland (libzpool) as well as the kernel. Porting notes: * Added missing sys/avl.h include to sys/zfs_rlock.h. * Removed 'dbuf is within the locked range' ASSERTs from dmu_sync(). This was needed because ztest does not yet use a locked_range_t. * Removed "Approved by:" tag requirement from OpenZFS commit check to prevent needless warnings when integrating changes which has not been merged to illumos. * Reverted free_list range lock changes which were originally needed to defer the cv_destroy() which was called immediately after cv_broadcast(). With d2733258 this should be safe but if not we may need to reintroduce this logic. * Reverts: The following two commits were reverted and squashed in to this change in order to make it easier to apply OpenZFS 9689. - d88895a0, which removed the dummy znode from zvol_state - e3a07cd0, which updated ztest to use range locks * Preserved optimized rangelock comparison function. Preserved the rangelock free list. The cv_destroy() function will block waiting for all processes in cv_wait() to be scheduled and drop their reference. This is done to ensure it's safe to free the condition variable. However, blocking while holding the rl->rl_lock mutex can result in a deadlock on Linux. A free list is introduced to defer the cv_destroy() and kmem_free() until after the mutex is released. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9689 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/680 External-issue: DLPX-58662 Closes #7980
2018-10-02 01:13:12 +03:00
#if defined(_KERNEL)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_rangelock_init);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_rangelock_fini);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_rangelock_enter);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_rangelock_tryenter);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_rangelock_exit);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_rangelock_reduce);
#endif