mirror_zfs/module/zfs/vdev_initialize.c

825 lines
24 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License (the "License").
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
*
* You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
* or https://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0.
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions
* and limitations under the License.
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
* If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
* fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying
* information: Portions Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2016, 2019 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
*/
#include <sys/spa.h>
#include <sys/spa_impl.h>
#include <sys/txg.h>
#include <sys/vdev_impl.h>
#include <sys/metaslab_impl.h>
#include <sys/dsl_synctask.h>
#include <sys/zap.h>
#include <sys/dmu_tx.h>
#include <sys/vdev_initialize.h>
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
/*
* Value that is written to disk during initialization.
*/
Cleanup: 64-bit kernel module parameters should use fixed width types Various module parameters such as `zfs_arc_max` were originally `uint64_t` on OpenSolaris/Illumos, but were changed to `unsigned long` for Linux compatibility because Linux's kernel default module parameter implementation did not support 64-bit types on 32-bit platforms. This caused problems when porting OpenZFS to Windows because its LLP64 memory model made `unsigned long` a 32-bit type on 64-bit, which created the undesireable situation that parameters that should accept 64-bit values could not on 64-bit Windows. Upon inspection, it turns out that the Linux kernel module parameter interface is extensible, such that we are allowed to define our own types. Rather than maintaining the original type change via hacks to to continue shrinking module parameters on 32-bit Linux, we implement support for 64-bit module parameters on Linux. After doing a review of all 64-bit kernel parameters (found via the man page and also proposed changes by Andrew Innes), the kernel module parameters fell into a few groups: Parameters that were originally 64-bit on Illumos: * dbuf_cache_max_bytes * dbuf_metadata_cache_max_bytes * l2arc_feed_min_ms * l2arc_feed_secs * l2arc_headroom * l2arc_headroom_boost * l2arc_write_boost * l2arc_write_max * metaslab_aliquot * metaslab_force_ganging * zfetch_array_rd_sz * zfs_arc_max * zfs_arc_meta_limit * zfs_arc_meta_min * zfs_arc_min * zfs_async_block_max_blocks * zfs_condense_max_obsolete_bytes * zfs_condense_min_mapping_bytes * zfs_deadman_checktime_ms * zfs_deadman_synctime_ms * zfs_initialize_chunk_size * zfs_initialize_value * zfs_lua_max_instrlimit * zfs_lua_max_memlimit * zil_slog_bulk Parameters that were originally 32-bit on Illumos: * zfs_per_txg_dirty_frees_percent Parameters that were originally `ssize_t` on Illumos: * zfs_immediate_write_sz Note that `ssize_t` is `int32_t` on 32-bit and `int64_t` on 64-bit. It has been upgraded to 64-bit. Parameters that were `long`/`unsigned long` because of Linux/FreeBSD influence: * l2arc_rebuild_blocks_min_l2size * zfs_key_max_salt_uses * zfs_max_log_walking * zfs_max_logsm_summary_length * zfs_metaslab_max_size_cache_sec * zfs_min_metaslabs_to_flush * zfs_multihost_interval * zfs_unflushed_log_block_max * zfs_unflushed_log_block_min * zfs_unflushed_log_block_pct * zfs_unflushed_max_mem_amt * zfs_unflushed_max_mem_ppm New parameters that do not exist in Illumos: * l2arc_trim_ahead * vdev_file_logical_ashift * vdev_file_physical_ashift * zfs_arc_dnode_limit * zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent * zfs_arc_dnode_reduce_percent * zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent * zfs_arc_sys_free * zfs_deadman_ziotime_ms * zfs_delete_blocks * zfs_history_output_max * zfs_livelist_max_entries * zfs_max_async_dedup_frees * zfs_max_nvlist_src_size * zfs_rebuild_max_segment * zfs_rebuild_vdev_limit * zfs_unflushed_log_txg_max * zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift * zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift * zfs_vnops_read_chunk_size * zvol_max_discard_blocks Rather than clutter the lists with commentary, the module parameters that need comments are repeated below. A few parameters were defined in Linux/FreeBSD specific code, where the use of ulong/long is not an issue for portability, so we leave them alone: * zfs_delete_blocks * zfs_key_max_salt_uses * zvol_max_discard_blocks The documentation for a few parameters was found to be incorrect: * zfs_deadman_checktime_ms - incorrectly documented as int * zfs_delete_blocks - not documented as Linux only * zfs_history_output_max - incorrectly documented as int * zfs_vnops_read_chunk_size - incorrectly documented as long * zvol_max_discard_blocks - incorrectly documented as ulong The documentation for these has been fixed, alongside the changes to document the switch to fixed width types. In addition, several kernel module parameters were percentages or held ashift values, so being 64-bit never made sense for them. They have been downgraded to 32-bit: * vdev_file_logical_ashift * vdev_file_physical_ashift * zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent * zfs_arc_dnode_reduce_percent * zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent * zfs_per_txg_dirty_frees_percent * zfs_unflushed_log_block_pct * zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift * zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift Of special note are `zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift` and `zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift`, which were already defined as `uint64_t`, and passed to the kernel as `ulong`. This is inherently buggy on big endian 32-bit Linux, since the values would not be written to the correct locations. 32-bit FreeBSD was unaffected because its sysctl code correctly treated this as a `uint64_t`. Lastly, a code comment suggests that `zfs_arc_sys_free` is Linux-specific, but there is nothing to indicate to me that it is Linux-specific. Nothing was done about that. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Original-patch-by: Andrew Innes <andrew.c12@gmail.com> Original-patch-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu> Closes #13984 Closes #14004
2022-10-03 22:06:54 +03:00
static uint64_t zfs_initialize_value = 0xdeadbeefdeadbeeeULL;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
/* maximum number of I/Os outstanding per leaf vdev */
static const int zfs_initialize_limit = 1;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
/* size of initializing writes; default 1MiB, see zfs_remove_max_segment */
Cleanup: 64-bit kernel module parameters should use fixed width types Various module parameters such as `zfs_arc_max` were originally `uint64_t` on OpenSolaris/Illumos, but were changed to `unsigned long` for Linux compatibility because Linux's kernel default module parameter implementation did not support 64-bit types on 32-bit platforms. This caused problems when porting OpenZFS to Windows because its LLP64 memory model made `unsigned long` a 32-bit type on 64-bit, which created the undesireable situation that parameters that should accept 64-bit values could not on 64-bit Windows. Upon inspection, it turns out that the Linux kernel module parameter interface is extensible, such that we are allowed to define our own types. Rather than maintaining the original type change via hacks to to continue shrinking module parameters on 32-bit Linux, we implement support for 64-bit module parameters on Linux. After doing a review of all 64-bit kernel parameters (found via the man page and also proposed changes by Andrew Innes), the kernel module parameters fell into a few groups: Parameters that were originally 64-bit on Illumos: * dbuf_cache_max_bytes * dbuf_metadata_cache_max_bytes * l2arc_feed_min_ms * l2arc_feed_secs * l2arc_headroom * l2arc_headroom_boost * l2arc_write_boost * l2arc_write_max * metaslab_aliquot * metaslab_force_ganging * zfetch_array_rd_sz * zfs_arc_max * zfs_arc_meta_limit * zfs_arc_meta_min * zfs_arc_min * zfs_async_block_max_blocks * zfs_condense_max_obsolete_bytes * zfs_condense_min_mapping_bytes * zfs_deadman_checktime_ms * zfs_deadman_synctime_ms * zfs_initialize_chunk_size * zfs_initialize_value * zfs_lua_max_instrlimit * zfs_lua_max_memlimit * zil_slog_bulk Parameters that were originally 32-bit on Illumos: * zfs_per_txg_dirty_frees_percent Parameters that were originally `ssize_t` on Illumos: * zfs_immediate_write_sz Note that `ssize_t` is `int32_t` on 32-bit and `int64_t` on 64-bit. It has been upgraded to 64-bit. Parameters that were `long`/`unsigned long` because of Linux/FreeBSD influence: * l2arc_rebuild_blocks_min_l2size * zfs_key_max_salt_uses * zfs_max_log_walking * zfs_max_logsm_summary_length * zfs_metaslab_max_size_cache_sec * zfs_min_metaslabs_to_flush * zfs_multihost_interval * zfs_unflushed_log_block_max * zfs_unflushed_log_block_min * zfs_unflushed_log_block_pct * zfs_unflushed_max_mem_amt * zfs_unflushed_max_mem_ppm New parameters that do not exist in Illumos: * l2arc_trim_ahead * vdev_file_logical_ashift * vdev_file_physical_ashift * zfs_arc_dnode_limit * zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent * zfs_arc_dnode_reduce_percent * zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent * zfs_arc_sys_free * zfs_deadman_ziotime_ms * zfs_delete_blocks * zfs_history_output_max * zfs_livelist_max_entries * zfs_max_async_dedup_frees * zfs_max_nvlist_src_size * zfs_rebuild_max_segment * zfs_rebuild_vdev_limit * zfs_unflushed_log_txg_max * zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift * zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift * zfs_vnops_read_chunk_size * zvol_max_discard_blocks Rather than clutter the lists with commentary, the module parameters that need comments are repeated below. A few parameters were defined in Linux/FreeBSD specific code, where the use of ulong/long is not an issue for portability, so we leave them alone: * zfs_delete_blocks * zfs_key_max_salt_uses * zvol_max_discard_blocks The documentation for a few parameters was found to be incorrect: * zfs_deadman_checktime_ms - incorrectly documented as int * zfs_delete_blocks - not documented as Linux only * zfs_history_output_max - incorrectly documented as int * zfs_vnops_read_chunk_size - incorrectly documented as long * zvol_max_discard_blocks - incorrectly documented as ulong The documentation for these has been fixed, alongside the changes to document the switch to fixed width types. In addition, several kernel module parameters were percentages or held ashift values, so being 64-bit never made sense for them. They have been downgraded to 32-bit: * vdev_file_logical_ashift * vdev_file_physical_ashift * zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent * zfs_arc_dnode_reduce_percent * zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent * zfs_per_txg_dirty_frees_percent * zfs_unflushed_log_block_pct * zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift * zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift Of special note are `zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift` and `zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift`, which were already defined as `uint64_t`, and passed to the kernel as `ulong`. This is inherently buggy on big endian 32-bit Linux, since the values would not be written to the correct locations. 32-bit FreeBSD was unaffected because its sysctl code correctly treated this as a `uint64_t`. Lastly, a code comment suggests that `zfs_arc_sys_free` is Linux-specific, but there is nothing to indicate to me that it is Linux-specific. Nothing was done about that. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Original-patch-by: Andrew Innes <andrew.c12@gmail.com> Original-patch-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu> Closes #13984 Closes #14004
2022-10-03 22:06:54 +03:00
static uint64_t zfs_initialize_chunk_size = 1024 * 1024;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
static boolean_t
vdev_initialize_should_stop(vdev_t *vd)
{
return (vd->vdev_initialize_exit_wanted || !vdev_writeable(vd) ||
vd->vdev_detached || vd->vdev_top->vdev_removing);
}
static void
vdev_initialize_zap_update_sync(void *arg, dmu_tx_t *tx)
{
/*
* We pass in the guid instead of the vdev_t since the vdev may
* have been freed prior to the sync task being processed. This
* happens when a vdev is detached as we call spa_config_vdev_exit(),
* stop the initializing thread, schedule the sync task, and free
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
* the vdev. Later when the scheduled sync task is invoked, it would
* find that the vdev has been freed.
*/
uint64_t guid = *(uint64_t *)arg;
uint64_t txg = dmu_tx_get_txg(tx);
kmem_free(arg, sizeof (uint64_t));
vdev_t *vd = spa_lookup_by_guid(tx->tx_pool->dp_spa, guid, B_FALSE);
if (vd == NULL || vd->vdev_top->vdev_removing || !vdev_is_concrete(vd))
return;
uint64_t last_offset = vd->vdev_initialize_offset[txg & TXG_MASK];
vd->vdev_initialize_offset[txg & TXG_MASK] = 0;
VERIFY(vd->vdev_leaf_zap != 0);
objset_t *mos = vd->vdev_spa->spa_meta_objset;
if (last_offset > 0) {
vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset = last_offset;
VERIFY0(zap_update(mos, vd->vdev_leaf_zap,
VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_LAST_OFFSET,
sizeof (last_offset), 1, &last_offset, tx));
}
if (vd->vdev_initialize_action_time > 0) {
uint64_t val = (uint64_t)vd->vdev_initialize_action_time;
VERIFY0(zap_update(mos, vd->vdev_leaf_zap,
VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_ACTION_TIME, sizeof (val),
1, &val, tx));
}
uint64_t initialize_state = vd->vdev_initialize_state;
VERIFY0(zap_update(mos, vd->vdev_leaf_zap,
VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_STATE, sizeof (initialize_state), 1,
&initialize_state, tx));
}
static void
vdev_initialize_zap_remove_sync(void *arg, dmu_tx_t *tx)
{
uint64_t guid = *(uint64_t *)arg;
kmem_free(arg, sizeof (uint64_t));
vdev_t *vd = spa_lookup_by_guid(tx->tx_pool->dp_spa, guid, B_FALSE);
if (vd == NULL || vd->vdev_top->vdev_removing || !vdev_is_concrete(vd))
return;
ASSERT3S(vd->vdev_initialize_state, ==, VDEV_INITIALIZE_NONE);
ASSERT3U(vd->vdev_leaf_zap, !=, 0);
vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset = 0;
vd->vdev_initialize_action_time = 0;
objset_t *mos = vd->vdev_spa->spa_meta_objset;
int error;
error = zap_remove(mos, vd->vdev_leaf_zap,
VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_LAST_OFFSET, tx);
VERIFY(error == 0 || error == ENOENT);
error = zap_remove(mos, vd->vdev_leaf_zap,
VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_STATE, tx);
VERIFY(error == 0 || error == ENOENT);
error = zap_remove(mos, vd->vdev_leaf_zap,
VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_ACTION_TIME, tx);
VERIFY(error == 0 || error == ENOENT);
}
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
static void
vdev_initialize_change_state(vdev_t *vd, vdev_initializing_state_t new_state)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock));
spa_t *spa = vd->vdev_spa;
if (new_state == vd->vdev_initialize_state)
return;
/*
* Copy the vd's guid, this will be freed by the sync task.
*/
uint64_t *guid = kmem_zalloc(sizeof (uint64_t), KM_SLEEP);
*guid = vd->vdev_guid;
/*
* If we're suspending, then preserving the original start time.
*/
if (vd->vdev_initialize_state != VDEV_INITIALIZE_SUSPENDED) {
vd->vdev_initialize_action_time = gethrestime_sec();
}
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
vdev_initializing_state_t old_state = vd->vdev_initialize_state;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
vd->vdev_initialize_state = new_state;
dmu_tx_t *tx = dmu_tx_create_dd(spa_get_dsl(spa)->dp_mos_dir);
VERIFY0(dmu_tx_assign(tx, TXG_WAIT));
if (new_state != VDEV_INITIALIZE_NONE) {
dsl_sync_task_nowait(spa_get_dsl(spa),
vdev_initialize_zap_update_sync, guid, tx);
} else {
dsl_sync_task_nowait(spa_get_dsl(spa),
vdev_initialize_zap_remove_sync, guid, tx);
}
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
switch (new_state) {
case VDEV_INITIALIZE_ACTIVE:
spa_history_log_internal(spa, "initialize", tx,
"vdev=%s activated", vd->vdev_path);
break;
case VDEV_INITIALIZE_SUSPENDED:
spa_history_log_internal(spa, "initialize", tx,
"vdev=%s suspended", vd->vdev_path);
break;
case VDEV_INITIALIZE_CANCELED:
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
if (old_state == VDEV_INITIALIZE_ACTIVE ||
old_state == VDEV_INITIALIZE_SUSPENDED)
spa_history_log_internal(spa, "initialize", tx,
"vdev=%s canceled", vd->vdev_path);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
break;
case VDEV_INITIALIZE_COMPLETE:
spa_history_log_internal(spa, "initialize", tx,
"vdev=%s complete", vd->vdev_path);
break;
case VDEV_INITIALIZE_NONE:
spa_history_log_internal(spa, "uninitialize", tx,
"vdev=%s", vd->vdev_path);
break;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
default:
panic("invalid state %llu", (unsigned long long)new_state);
}
dmu_tx_commit(tx);
Add subcommand to wait for background zfs activity to complete Currently the best way to wait for the completion of a long-running operation in a pool, like a scrub or device removal, is to poll 'zpool status' and parse its output, which is neither efficient nor convenient. This change adds a 'wait' subcommand to the zpool command. When invoked, 'zpool wait' will block until a specified type of background activity completes. Currently, this subcommand can wait for any of the following: - Scrubs or resilvers to complete - Devices to initialized - Devices to be replaced - Devices to be removed - Checkpoints to be discarded - Background freeing to complete For example, a scrub that is in progress could be waited for by running zpool wait -t scrub <pool> This also adds a -w flag to the attach, checkpoint, initialize, replace, remove, and scrub subcommands. When used, this flag makes the operations kicked off by these subcommands synchronous instead of asynchronous. This functionality is implemented using a new ioctl. The type of activity to wait for is provided as input to the ioctl, and the ioctl blocks until all activity of that type has completed. An ioctl was used over other methods of kernel-userspace communiction primarily for the sake of portability. Porting Notes: This is ported from Delphix OS change DLPX-44432. The following changes were made while porting: - Added ZoL-style ioctl input declaration. - Reorganized error handling in zpool_initialize in libzfs to integrate better with changes made for TRIM support. - Fixed check for whether a checkpoint discard is in progress. Previously it also waited if the pool had a checkpoint, instead of just if a checkpoint was being discarded. - Exposed zfs_initialize_chunk_size as a ZoL-style tunable. - Updated more existing tests to make use of new 'zpool wait' functionality, tests that don't exist in Delphix OS. - Used existing ZoL tunable zfs_scan_suspend_progress, together with zinject, in place of a new tunable zfs_scan_max_blks_per_txg. - Added support for a non-integral interval argument to zpool wait. Future work: ZoL has support for trimming devices, which Delphix OS does not. In the future, 'zpool wait' could be extended to add the ability to wait for trim operations to complete. Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: John Gallagher <john.gallagher@delphix.com> Closes #9162
2019-09-14 04:09:06 +03:00
if (new_state != VDEV_INITIALIZE_ACTIVE)
spa_notify_waiters(spa);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
static void
vdev_initialize_cb(zio_t *zio)
{
vdev_t *vd = zio->io_vd;
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
if (zio->io_error == ENXIO && !vdev_writeable(vd)) {
/*
* The I/O failed because the vdev was unavailable; roll the
* last offset back. (This works because spa_sync waits on
* spa_txg_zio before it runs sync tasks.)
*/
uint64_t *off =
&vd->vdev_initialize_offset[zio->io_txg & TXG_MASK];
*off = MIN(*off, zio->io_offset);
} else {
/*
* Since initializing is best-effort, we ignore I/O errors and
* rely on vdev_probe to determine if the errors are more
* critical.
*/
if (zio->io_error != 0)
vd->vdev_stat.vs_initialize_errors++;
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_done += zio->io_orig_size;
}
ASSERT3U(vd->vdev_initialize_inflight, >, 0);
vd->vdev_initialize_inflight--;
cv_broadcast(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_cv);
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
spa_config_exit(vd->vdev_spa, SCL_STATE_ALL, vd);
}
/* Takes care of physical writing and limiting # of concurrent ZIOs. */
static int
vdev_initialize_write(vdev_t *vd, uint64_t start, uint64_t size, abd_t *data)
{
spa_t *spa = vd->vdev_spa;
/* Limit inflight initializing I/Os */
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
while (vd->vdev_initialize_inflight >= zfs_initialize_limit) {
cv_wait(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_cv,
&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
}
vd->vdev_initialize_inflight++;
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
dmu_tx_t *tx = dmu_tx_create_dd(spa_get_dsl(spa)->dp_mos_dir);
VERIFY0(dmu_tx_assign(tx, TXG_WAIT));
uint64_t txg = dmu_tx_get_txg(tx);
spa_config_enter(spa, SCL_STATE_ALL, vd, RW_READER);
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
if (vd->vdev_initialize_offset[txg & TXG_MASK] == 0) {
uint64_t *guid = kmem_zalloc(sizeof (uint64_t), KM_SLEEP);
*guid = vd->vdev_guid;
/* This is the first write of this txg. */
dsl_sync_task_nowait(spa_get_dsl(spa),
vdev_initialize_zap_update_sync, guid, tx);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
/*
* We know the vdev struct will still be around since all
* consumers of vdev_free must stop the initialization first.
*/
if (vdev_initialize_should_stop(vd)) {
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
ASSERT3U(vd->vdev_initialize_inflight, >, 0);
vd->vdev_initialize_inflight--;
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
spa_config_exit(vd->vdev_spa, SCL_STATE_ALL, vd);
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
dmu_tx_commit(tx);
return (SET_ERROR(EINTR));
}
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
vd->vdev_initialize_offset[txg & TXG_MASK] = start + size;
zio_nowait(zio_write_phys(spa->spa_txg_zio[txg & TXG_MASK], vd, start,
size, data, ZIO_CHECKSUM_OFF, vdev_initialize_cb, NULL,
ZIO_PRIORITY_INITIALIZING, ZIO_FLAG_CANFAIL, B_FALSE));
/* vdev_initialize_cb releases SCL_STATE_ALL */
dmu_tx_commit(tx);
return (0);
}
/*
* Callback to fill each ABD chunk with zfs_initialize_value. len must be
* divisible by sizeof (uint64_t), and buf must be 8-byte aligned. The ABD
* allocation will guarantee these for us.
*/
static int
vdev_initialize_block_fill(void *buf, size_t len, void *unused)
{
(void) unused;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
ASSERT0(len % sizeof (uint64_t));
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < len; i += sizeof (uint64_t)) {
*(uint64_t *)((char *)(buf) + i) = zfs_initialize_value;
}
return (0);
}
static abd_t *
vdev_initialize_block_alloc(void)
{
/* Allocate ABD for filler data */
abd_t *data = abd_alloc_for_io(zfs_initialize_chunk_size, B_FALSE);
ASSERT0(zfs_initialize_chunk_size % sizeof (uint64_t));
(void) abd_iterate_func(data, 0, zfs_initialize_chunk_size,
vdev_initialize_block_fill, NULL);
return (data);
}
static void
vdev_initialize_block_free(abd_t *data)
{
abd_free(data);
}
static int
vdev_initialize_ranges(vdev_t *vd, abd_t *data)
{
Reduce loaded range tree memory usage This patch implements a new tree structure for ZFS, and uses it to store range trees more efficiently. The new structure is approximately a B-tree, though there are some small differences from the usual characterizations. The tree has core nodes and leaf nodes; each contain data elements, which the elements in the core nodes acting as separators between its children. The difference between core and leaf nodes is that the core nodes have an array of children, while leaf nodes don't. Every node in the tree may be only partially full; in most cases, they are all at least 50% full (in terms of element count) except for the root node, which can be less full. Underfull nodes will steal from their neighbors or merge to remain full enough, while overfull nodes will split in two. The data elements are contained in tree-controlled buffers; they are copied into these on insertion, and overwritten on deletion. This means that the elements are not independently allocated, which reduces overhead, but also means they can't be shared between trees (and also that pointers to them are only valid until a side-effectful tree operation occurs). The overhead varies based on how dense the tree is, but is usually on the order of about 50% of the element size; the per-node overheads are very small, and so don't make a significant difference. The trees can accept arbitrary records; they accept a size and a comparator to allow them to be used for a variety of purposes. The new trees replace the AVL trees used in the range trees today. Currently, the range_seg_t structure contains three 8 byte integers of payload and two 24 byte avl_tree_node_ts to handle its storage in both an offset-sorted tree and a size-sorted tree (total size: 64 bytes). In the new model, the range seg structures are usually two 4 byte integers, but a separate one needs to exist for the size-sorted and offset-sorted tree. Between the raw size, the 50% overhead, and the double storage, the new btrees are expected to use 8*1.5*2 = 24 bytes per record, or 33.3% as much memory as the AVL trees (this is for the purposes of storing metaslab range trees; for other purposes, like scrubs, they use ~50% as much memory). We reduced the size of the payload in the range segments by teaching range trees about starting offsets and shifts; since metaslabs have a fixed starting offset, and they all operate in terms of disk sectors, we can store the ranges using 4-byte integers as long as the size of the metaslab divided by the sector size is less than 2^32. For 512-byte sectors, this is a 2^41 (or 2TB) metaslab, which with the default settings corresponds to a 256PB disk. 4k sector disks can handle metaslabs up to 2^46 bytes, or 2^63 byte disks. Since we do not anticipate disks of this size in the near future, there should be almost no cases where metaslabs need 64-byte integers to store their ranges. We do still have the capability to store 64-byte integer ranges to account for cases where we are storing per-vdev (or per-dnode) trees, which could reasonably go above the limits discussed. We also do not store fill information in the compact version of the node, since it is only used for sorted scrub. We also optimized the metaslab loading process in various other ways to offset some inefficiencies in the btree model. While individual operations (find, insert, remove_from) are faster for the btree than they are for the avl tree, remove usually requires a find operation, while in the AVL tree model the element itself suffices. Some clever changes actually caused an overall speedup in metaslab loading; we use approximately 40% less cpu to load metaslabs in our tests on Illumos. Another memory and performance optimization was achieved by changing what is stored in the size-sorted trees. When a disk is heavily fragmented, the df algorithm used by default in ZFS will almost always find a number of small regions in its initial cursor-based search; it will usually only fall back to the size-sorted tree to find larger regions. If we increase the size of the cursor-based search slightly, and don't store segments that are smaller than a tunable size floor in the size-sorted tree, we can further cut memory usage down to below 20% of what the AVL trees store. This also results in further reductions in CPU time spent loading metaslabs. The 16KiB size floor was chosen because it results in substantial memory usage reduction while not usually resulting in situations where we can't find an appropriate chunk with the cursor and are forced to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree. In addition, even if we do have to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree, the chunk would be too small to use for ZIL allocations, so it isn't as big of a loss as it might otherwise be. And often, more small allocations will follow the initial one, and the cursor search will now find the remainder of the chunk we didn't use all of and use it for subsequent allocations. Practical testing has shown little or no change in fragmentation as a result of this change. If the size-sorted tree becomes empty while the offset sorted one still has entries, it will load all the entries from the offset sorted tree and disregard the size floor until it is unloaded again. This operation occurs rarely with the default setting, only on incredibly thoroughly fragmented pools. There are some other small changes to zdb to teach it to handle btrees, but nothing major. Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy seb@delphix.com Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #9181
2019-10-09 20:36:03 +03:00
range_tree_t *rt = vd->vdev_initialize_tree;
zfs_btree_t *bt = &rt->rt_root;
zfs_btree_index_t where;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
Reduce loaded range tree memory usage This patch implements a new tree structure for ZFS, and uses it to store range trees more efficiently. The new structure is approximately a B-tree, though there are some small differences from the usual characterizations. The tree has core nodes and leaf nodes; each contain data elements, which the elements in the core nodes acting as separators between its children. The difference between core and leaf nodes is that the core nodes have an array of children, while leaf nodes don't. Every node in the tree may be only partially full; in most cases, they are all at least 50% full (in terms of element count) except for the root node, which can be less full. Underfull nodes will steal from their neighbors or merge to remain full enough, while overfull nodes will split in two. The data elements are contained in tree-controlled buffers; they are copied into these on insertion, and overwritten on deletion. This means that the elements are not independently allocated, which reduces overhead, but also means they can't be shared between trees (and also that pointers to them are only valid until a side-effectful tree operation occurs). The overhead varies based on how dense the tree is, but is usually on the order of about 50% of the element size; the per-node overheads are very small, and so don't make a significant difference. The trees can accept arbitrary records; they accept a size and a comparator to allow them to be used for a variety of purposes. The new trees replace the AVL trees used in the range trees today. Currently, the range_seg_t structure contains three 8 byte integers of payload and two 24 byte avl_tree_node_ts to handle its storage in both an offset-sorted tree and a size-sorted tree (total size: 64 bytes). In the new model, the range seg structures are usually two 4 byte integers, but a separate one needs to exist for the size-sorted and offset-sorted tree. Between the raw size, the 50% overhead, and the double storage, the new btrees are expected to use 8*1.5*2 = 24 bytes per record, or 33.3% as much memory as the AVL trees (this is for the purposes of storing metaslab range trees; for other purposes, like scrubs, they use ~50% as much memory). We reduced the size of the payload in the range segments by teaching range trees about starting offsets and shifts; since metaslabs have a fixed starting offset, and they all operate in terms of disk sectors, we can store the ranges using 4-byte integers as long as the size of the metaslab divided by the sector size is less than 2^32. For 512-byte sectors, this is a 2^41 (or 2TB) metaslab, which with the default settings corresponds to a 256PB disk. 4k sector disks can handle metaslabs up to 2^46 bytes, or 2^63 byte disks. Since we do not anticipate disks of this size in the near future, there should be almost no cases where metaslabs need 64-byte integers to store their ranges. We do still have the capability to store 64-byte integer ranges to account for cases where we are storing per-vdev (or per-dnode) trees, which could reasonably go above the limits discussed. We also do not store fill information in the compact version of the node, since it is only used for sorted scrub. We also optimized the metaslab loading process in various other ways to offset some inefficiencies in the btree model. While individual operations (find, insert, remove_from) are faster for the btree than they are for the avl tree, remove usually requires a find operation, while in the AVL tree model the element itself suffices. Some clever changes actually caused an overall speedup in metaslab loading; we use approximately 40% less cpu to load metaslabs in our tests on Illumos. Another memory and performance optimization was achieved by changing what is stored in the size-sorted trees. When a disk is heavily fragmented, the df algorithm used by default in ZFS will almost always find a number of small regions in its initial cursor-based search; it will usually only fall back to the size-sorted tree to find larger regions. If we increase the size of the cursor-based search slightly, and don't store segments that are smaller than a tunable size floor in the size-sorted tree, we can further cut memory usage down to below 20% of what the AVL trees store. This also results in further reductions in CPU time spent loading metaslabs. The 16KiB size floor was chosen because it results in substantial memory usage reduction while not usually resulting in situations where we can't find an appropriate chunk with the cursor and are forced to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree. In addition, even if we do have to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree, the chunk would be too small to use for ZIL allocations, so it isn't as big of a loss as it might otherwise be. And often, more small allocations will follow the initial one, and the cursor search will now find the remainder of the chunk we didn't use all of and use it for subsequent allocations. Practical testing has shown little or no change in fragmentation as a result of this change. If the size-sorted tree becomes empty while the offset sorted one still has entries, it will load all the entries from the offset sorted tree and disregard the size floor until it is unloaded again. This operation occurs rarely with the default setting, only on incredibly thoroughly fragmented pools. There are some other small changes to zdb to teach it to handle btrees, but nothing major. Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy seb@delphix.com Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #9181
2019-10-09 20:36:03 +03:00
for (range_seg_t *rs = zfs_btree_first(bt, &where); rs != NULL;
rs = zfs_btree_next(bt, &where, &where)) {
uint64_t size = rs_get_end(rs, rt) - rs_get_start(rs, rt);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
/* Split range into legally-sized physical chunks */
uint64_t writes_required =
((size - 1) / zfs_initialize_chunk_size) + 1;
for (uint64_t w = 0; w < writes_required; w++) {
int error;
error = vdev_initialize_write(vd,
Reduce loaded range tree memory usage This patch implements a new tree structure for ZFS, and uses it to store range trees more efficiently. The new structure is approximately a B-tree, though there are some small differences from the usual characterizations. The tree has core nodes and leaf nodes; each contain data elements, which the elements in the core nodes acting as separators between its children. The difference between core and leaf nodes is that the core nodes have an array of children, while leaf nodes don't. Every node in the tree may be only partially full; in most cases, they are all at least 50% full (in terms of element count) except for the root node, which can be less full. Underfull nodes will steal from their neighbors or merge to remain full enough, while overfull nodes will split in two. The data elements are contained in tree-controlled buffers; they are copied into these on insertion, and overwritten on deletion. This means that the elements are not independently allocated, which reduces overhead, but also means they can't be shared between trees (and also that pointers to them are only valid until a side-effectful tree operation occurs). The overhead varies based on how dense the tree is, but is usually on the order of about 50% of the element size; the per-node overheads are very small, and so don't make a significant difference. The trees can accept arbitrary records; they accept a size and a comparator to allow them to be used for a variety of purposes. The new trees replace the AVL trees used in the range trees today. Currently, the range_seg_t structure contains three 8 byte integers of payload and two 24 byte avl_tree_node_ts to handle its storage in both an offset-sorted tree and a size-sorted tree (total size: 64 bytes). In the new model, the range seg structures are usually two 4 byte integers, but a separate one needs to exist for the size-sorted and offset-sorted tree. Between the raw size, the 50% overhead, and the double storage, the new btrees are expected to use 8*1.5*2 = 24 bytes per record, or 33.3% as much memory as the AVL trees (this is for the purposes of storing metaslab range trees; for other purposes, like scrubs, they use ~50% as much memory). We reduced the size of the payload in the range segments by teaching range trees about starting offsets and shifts; since metaslabs have a fixed starting offset, and they all operate in terms of disk sectors, we can store the ranges using 4-byte integers as long as the size of the metaslab divided by the sector size is less than 2^32. For 512-byte sectors, this is a 2^41 (or 2TB) metaslab, which with the default settings corresponds to a 256PB disk. 4k sector disks can handle metaslabs up to 2^46 bytes, or 2^63 byte disks. Since we do not anticipate disks of this size in the near future, there should be almost no cases where metaslabs need 64-byte integers to store their ranges. We do still have the capability to store 64-byte integer ranges to account for cases where we are storing per-vdev (or per-dnode) trees, which could reasonably go above the limits discussed. We also do not store fill information in the compact version of the node, since it is only used for sorted scrub. We also optimized the metaslab loading process in various other ways to offset some inefficiencies in the btree model. While individual operations (find, insert, remove_from) are faster for the btree than they are for the avl tree, remove usually requires a find operation, while in the AVL tree model the element itself suffices. Some clever changes actually caused an overall speedup in metaslab loading; we use approximately 40% less cpu to load metaslabs in our tests on Illumos. Another memory and performance optimization was achieved by changing what is stored in the size-sorted trees. When a disk is heavily fragmented, the df algorithm used by default in ZFS will almost always find a number of small regions in its initial cursor-based search; it will usually only fall back to the size-sorted tree to find larger regions. If we increase the size of the cursor-based search slightly, and don't store segments that are smaller than a tunable size floor in the size-sorted tree, we can further cut memory usage down to below 20% of what the AVL trees store. This also results in further reductions in CPU time spent loading metaslabs. The 16KiB size floor was chosen because it results in substantial memory usage reduction while not usually resulting in situations where we can't find an appropriate chunk with the cursor and are forced to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree. In addition, even if we do have to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree, the chunk would be too small to use for ZIL allocations, so it isn't as big of a loss as it might otherwise be. And often, more small allocations will follow the initial one, and the cursor search will now find the remainder of the chunk we didn't use all of and use it for subsequent allocations. Practical testing has shown little or no change in fragmentation as a result of this change. If the size-sorted tree becomes empty while the offset sorted one still has entries, it will load all the entries from the offset sorted tree and disregard the size floor until it is unloaded again. This operation occurs rarely with the default setting, only on incredibly thoroughly fragmented pools. There are some other small changes to zdb to teach it to handle btrees, but nothing major. Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy seb@delphix.com Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #9181
2019-10-09 20:36:03 +03:00
VDEV_LABEL_START_SIZE + rs_get_start(rs, rt) +
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
(w * zfs_initialize_chunk_size),
MIN(size - (w * zfs_initialize_chunk_size),
zfs_initialize_chunk_size), data);
if (error != 0)
return (error);
}
}
return (0);
}
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
static void
vdev_initialize_xlate_last_rs_end(void *arg, range_seg64_t *physical_rs)
{
uint64_t *last_rs_end = (uint64_t *)arg;
if (physical_rs->rs_end > *last_rs_end)
*last_rs_end = physical_rs->rs_end;
}
static void
vdev_initialize_xlate_progress(void *arg, range_seg64_t *physical_rs)
{
vdev_t *vd = (vdev_t *)arg;
uint64_t size = physical_rs->rs_end - physical_rs->rs_start;
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_est += size;
if (vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset > physical_rs->rs_end) {
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_done += size;
} else if (vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset > physical_rs->rs_start &&
vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset < physical_rs->rs_end) {
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_done +=
vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset - physical_rs->rs_start;
}
}
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
static void
vdev_initialize_calculate_progress(vdev_t *vd)
{
ASSERT(spa_config_held(vd->vdev_spa, SCL_CONFIG, RW_READER) ||
spa_config_held(vd->vdev_spa, SCL_CONFIG, RW_WRITER));
ASSERT(vd->vdev_leaf_zap != 0);
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_est = 0;
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_done = 0;
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < vd->vdev_top->vdev_ms_count; i++) {
metaslab_t *msp = vd->vdev_top->vdev_ms[i];
mutex_enter(&msp->ms_lock);
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
uint64_t ms_free = (msp->ms_size -
metaslab_allocated_space(msp)) /
vdev_get_ndisks(vd->vdev_top);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
/*
* Convert the metaslab range to a physical range
* on our vdev. We use this to determine if we are
* in the middle of this metaslab range.
*/
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
range_seg64_t logical_rs, physical_rs, remain_rs;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
logical_rs.rs_start = msp->ms_start;
logical_rs.rs_end = msp->ms_start + msp->ms_size;
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
/* Metaslab space after this offset has not been initialized */
vdev_xlate(vd, &logical_rs, &physical_rs, &remain_rs);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
if (vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset <= physical_rs.rs_start) {
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_est += ms_free;
mutex_exit(&msp->ms_lock);
continue;
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
}
/* Metaslab space before this offset has been initialized */
uint64_t last_rs_end = physical_rs.rs_end;
if (!vdev_xlate_is_empty(&remain_rs)) {
vdev_xlate_walk(vd, &remain_rs,
vdev_initialize_xlate_last_rs_end, &last_rs_end);
}
if (vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset > last_rs_end) {
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_done += ms_free;
vd->vdev_initialize_bytes_est += ms_free;
mutex_exit(&msp->ms_lock);
continue;
}
/*
* If we get here, we're in the middle of initializing this
* metaslab. Load it and walk the free tree for more accurate
* progress estimation.
*/
VERIFY0(metaslab_load(msp));
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
Reduce loaded range tree memory usage This patch implements a new tree structure for ZFS, and uses it to store range trees more efficiently. The new structure is approximately a B-tree, though there are some small differences from the usual characterizations. The tree has core nodes and leaf nodes; each contain data elements, which the elements in the core nodes acting as separators between its children. The difference between core and leaf nodes is that the core nodes have an array of children, while leaf nodes don't. Every node in the tree may be only partially full; in most cases, they are all at least 50% full (in terms of element count) except for the root node, which can be less full. Underfull nodes will steal from their neighbors or merge to remain full enough, while overfull nodes will split in two. The data elements are contained in tree-controlled buffers; they are copied into these on insertion, and overwritten on deletion. This means that the elements are not independently allocated, which reduces overhead, but also means they can't be shared between trees (and also that pointers to them are only valid until a side-effectful tree operation occurs). The overhead varies based on how dense the tree is, but is usually on the order of about 50% of the element size; the per-node overheads are very small, and so don't make a significant difference. The trees can accept arbitrary records; they accept a size and a comparator to allow them to be used for a variety of purposes. The new trees replace the AVL trees used in the range trees today. Currently, the range_seg_t structure contains three 8 byte integers of payload and two 24 byte avl_tree_node_ts to handle its storage in both an offset-sorted tree and a size-sorted tree (total size: 64 bytes). In the new model, the range seg structures are usually two 4 byte integers, but a separate one needs to exist for the size-sorted and offset-sorted tree. Between the raw size, the 50% overhead, and the double storage, the new btrees are expected to use 8*1.5*2 = 24 bytes per record, or 33.3% as much memory as the AVL trees (this is for the purposes of storing metaslab range trees; for other purposes, like scrubs, they use ~50% as much memory). We reduced the size of the payload in the range segments by teaching range trees about starting offsets and shifts; since metaslabs have a fixed starting offset, and they all operate in terms of disk sectors, we can store the ranges using 4-byte integers as long as the size of the metaslab divided by the sector size is less than 2^32. For 512-byte sectors, this is a 2^41 (or 2TB) metaslab, which with the default settings corresponds to a 256PB disk. 4k sector disks can handle metaslabs up to 2^46 bytes, or 2^63 byte disks. Since we do not anticipate disks of this size in the near future, there should be almost no cases where metaslabs need 64-byte integers to store their ranges. We do still have the capability to store 64-byte integer ranges to account for cases where we are storing per-vdev (or per-dnode) trees, which could reasonably go above the limits discussed. We also do not store fill information in the compact version of the node, since it is only used for sorted scrub. We also optimized the metaslab loading process in various other ways to offset some inefficiencies in the btree model. While individual operations (find, insert, remove_from) are faster for the btree than they are for the avl tree, remove usually requires a find operation, while in the AVL tree model the element itself suffices. Some clever changes actually caused an overall speedup in metaslab loading; we use approximately 40% less cpu to load metaslabs in our tests on Illumos. Another memory and performance optimization was achieved by changing what is stored in the size-sorted trees. When a disk is heavily fragmented, the df algorithm used by default in ZFS will almost always find a number of small regions in its initial cursor-based search; it will usually only fall back to the size-sorted tree to find larger regions. If we increase the size of the cursor-based search slightly, and don't store segments that are smaller than a tunable size floor in the size-sorted tree, we can further cut memory usage down to below 20% of what the AVL trees store. This also results in further reductions in CPU time spent loading metaslabs. The 16KiB size floor was chosen because it results in substantial memory usage reduction while not usually resulting in situations where we can't find an appropriate chunk with the cursor and are forced to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree. In addition, even if we do have to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree, the chunk would be too small to use for ZIL allocations, so it isn't as big of a loss as it might otherwise be. And often, more small allocations will follow the initial one, and the cursor search will now find the remainder of the chunk we didn't use all of and use it for subsequent allocations. Practical testing has shown little or no change in fragmentation as a result of this change. If the size-sorted tree becomes empty while the offset sorted one still has entries, it will load all the entries from the offset sorted tree and disregard the size floor until it is unloaded again. This operation occurs rarely with the default setting, only on incredibly thoroughly fragmented pools. There are some other small changes to zdb to teach it to handle btrees, but nothing major. Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy seb@delphix.com Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #9181
2019-10-09 20:36:03 +03:00
zfs_btree_index_t where;
range_tree_t *rt = msp->ms_allocatable;
for (range_seg_t *rs =
zfs_btree_first(&rt->rt_root, &where); rs;
rs = zfs_btree_next(&rt->rt_root, &where,
&where)) {
logical_rs.rs_start = rs_get_start(rs, rt);
logical_rs.rs_end = rs_get_end(rs, rt);
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
vdev_xlate_walk(vd, &logical_rs,
vdev_initialize_xlate_progress, vd);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
mutex_exit(&msp->ms_lock);
}
}
static int
vdev_initialize_load(vdev_t *vd)
{
int err = 0;
ASSERT(spa_config_held(vd->vdev_spa, SCL_CONFIG, RW_READER) ||
spa_config_held(vd->vdev_spa, SCL_CONFIG, RW_WRITER));
ASSERT(vd->vdev_leaf_zap != 0);
if (vd->vdev_initialize_state == VDEV_INITIALIZE_ACTIVE ||
vd->vdev_initialize_state == VDEV_INITIALIZE_SUSPENDED) {
err = zap_lookup(vd->vdev_spa->spa_meta_objset,
vd->vdev_leaf_zap, VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_LAST_OFFSET,
sizeof (vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset), 1,
&vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset);
if (err == ENOENT) {
vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset = 0;
err = 0;
}
}
vdev_initialize_calculate_progress(vd);
return (err);
}
static void
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
vdev_initialize_xlate_range_add(void *arg, range_seg64_t *physical_rs)
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
{
vdev_t *vd = arg;
/* Only add segments that we have not visited yet */
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
if (physical_rs->rs_end <= vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset)
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
return;
/* Pick up where we left off mid-range. */
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
if (vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset > physical_rs->rs_start) {
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
zfs_dbgmsg("range write: vd %s changed (%llu, %llu) to "
"(%llu, %llu)", vd->vdev_path,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
(u_longlong_t)physical_rs->rs_start,
(u_longlong_t)physical_rs->rs_end,
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
(u_longlong_t)vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
(u_longlong_t)physical_rs->rs_end);
ASSERT3U(physical_rs->rs_end, >,
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset);
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
physical_rs->rs_start = vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-14 00:51:51 +03:00
ASSERT3U(physical_rs->rs_end, >, physical_rs->rs_start);
range_tree_add(vd->vdev_initialize_tree, physical_rs->rs_start,
physical_rs->rs_end - physical_rs->rs_start);
}
/*
* Convert the logical range into a physical range and add it to our
* avl tree.
*/
static void
vdev_initialize_range_add(void *arg, uint64_t start, uint64_t size)
{
vdev_t *vd = arg;
range_seg64_t logical_rs;
logical_rs.rs_start = start;
logical_rs.rs_end = start + size;
ASSERT(vd->vdev_ops->vdev_op_leaf);
vdev_xlate_walk(vd, &logical_rs, vdev_initialize_xlate_range_add, arg);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
static __attribute__((noreturn)) void
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
vdev_initialize_thread(void *arg)
{
vdev_t *vd = arg;
spa_t *spa = vd->vdev_spa;
int error = 0;
uint64_t ms_count = 0;
ASSERT(vdev_is_concrete(vd));
spa_config_enter(spa, SCL_CONFIG, FTAG, RW_READER);
vd->vdev_initialize_last_offset = 0;
VERIFY0(vdev_initialize_load(vd));
abd_t *deadbeef = vdev_initialize_block_alloc();
Reduce loaded range tree memory usage This patch implements a new tree structure for ZFS, and uses it to store range trees more efficiently. The new structure is approximately a B-tree, though there are some small differences from the usual characterizations. The tree has core nodes and leaf nodes; each contain data elements, which the elements in the core nodes acting as separators between its children. The difference between core and leaf nodes is that the core nodes have an array of children, while leaf nodes don't. Every node in the tree may be only partially full; in most cases, they are all at least 50% full (in terms of element count) except for the root node, which can be less full. Underfull nodes will steal from their neighbors or merge to remain full enough, while overfull nodes will split in two. The data elements are contained in tree-controlled buffers; they are copied into these on insertion, and overwritten on deletion. This means that the elements are not independently allocated, which reduces overhead, but also means they can't be shared between trees (and also that pointers to them are only valid until a side-effectful tree operation occurs). The overhead varies based on how dense the tree is, but is usually on the order of about 50% of the element size; the per-node overheads are very small, and so don't make a significant difference. The trees can accept arbitrary records; they accept a size and a comparator to allow them to be used for a variety of purposes. The new trees replace the AVL trees used in the range trees today. Currently, the range_seg_t structure contains three 8 byte integers of payload and two 24 byte avl_tree_node_ts to handle its storage in both an offset-sorted tree and a size-sorted tree (total size: 64 bytes). In the new model, the range seg structures are usually two 4 byte integers, but a separate one needs to exist for the size-sorted and offset-sorted tree. Between the raw size, the 50% overhead, and the double storage, the new btrees are expected to use 8*1.5*2 = 24 bytes per record, or 33.3% as much memory as the AVL trees (this is for the purposes of storing metaslab range trees; for other purposes, like scrubs, they use ~50% as much memory). We reduced the size of the payload in the range segments by teaching range trees about starting offsets and shifts; since metaslabs have a fixed starting offset, and they all operate in terms of disk sectors, we can store the ranges using 4-byte integers as long as the size of the metaslab divided by the sector size is less than 2^32. For 512-byte sectors, this is a 2^41 (or 2TB) metaslab, which with the default settings corresponds to a 256PB disk. 4k sector disks can handle metaslabs up to 2^46 bytes, or 2^63 byte disks. Since we do not anticipate disks of this size in the near future, there should be almost no cases where metaslabs need 64-byte integers to store their ranges. We do still have the capability to store 64-byte integer ranges to account for cases where we are storing per-vdev (or per-dnode) trees, which could reasonably go above the limits discussed. We also do not store fill information in the compact version of the node, since it is only used for sorted scrub. We also optimized the metaslab loading process in various other ways to offset some inefficiencies in the btree model. While individual operations (find, insert, remove_from) are faster for the btree than they are for the avl tree, remove usually requires a find operation, while in the AVL tree model the element itself suffices. Some clever changes actually caused an overall speedup in metaslab loading; we use approximately 40% less cpu to load metaslabs in our tests on Illumos. Another memory and performance optimization was achieved by changing what is stored in the size-sorted trees. When a disk is heavily fragmented, the df algorithm used by default in ZFS will almost always find a number of small regions in its initial cursor-based search; it will usually only fall back to the size-sorted tree to find larger regions. If we increase the size of the cursor-based search slightly, and don't store segments that are smaller than a tunable size floor in the size-sorted tree, we can further cut memory usage down to below 20% of what the AVL trees store. This also results in further reductions in CPU time spent loading metaslabs. The 16KiB size floor was chosen because it results in substantial memory usage reduction while not usually resulting in situations where we can't find an appropriate chunk with the cursor and are forced to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree. In addition, even if we do have to use an oversized chunk from the size-sorted tree, the chunk would be too small to use for ZIL allocations, so it isn't as big of a loss as it might otherwise be. And often, more small allocations will follow the initial one, and the cursor search will now find the remainder of the chunk we didn't use all of and use it for subsequent allocations. Practical testing has shown little or no change in fragmentation as a result of this change. If the size-sorted tree becomes empty while the offset sorted one still has entries, it will load all the entries from the offset sorted tree and disregard the size floor until it is unloaded again. This operation occurs rarely with the default setting, only on incredibly thoroughly fragmented pools. There are some other small changes to zdb to teach it to handle btrees, but nothing major. Reviewed-by: George Wilson <gwilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy seb@delphix.com Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #9181
2019-10-09 20:36:03 +03:00
vd->vdev_initialize_tree = range_tree_create(NULL, RANGE_SEG64, NULL,
0, 0);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
for (uint64_t i = 0; !vd->vdev_detached &&
i < vd->vdev_top->vdev_ms_count; i++) {
metaslab_t *msp = vd->vdev_top->vdev_ms[i];
boolean_t unload_when_done = B_FALSE;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
/*
* If we've expanded the top-level vdev or it's our
* first pass, calculate our progress.
*/
if (vd->vdev_top->vdev_ms_count != ms_count) {
vdev_initialize_calculate_progress(vd);
ms_count = vd->vdev_top->vdev_ms_count;
}
Add TRIM support UNMAP/TRIM support is a frequently-requested feature to help prevent performance from degrading on SSDs and on various other SAN-like storage back-ends. By issuing UNMAP/TRIM commands for sectors which are no longer allocated the underlying device can often more efficiently manage itself. This TRIM implementation is modeled on the `zpool initialize` feature which writes a pattern to all unallocated space in the pool. The new `zpool trim` command uses the same vdev_xlate() code to calculate what sectors are unallocated, the same per- vdev TRIM thread model and locking, and the same basic CLI for a consistent user experience. The core difference is that instead of writing a pattern it will issue UNMAP/TRIM commands for those extents. The zio pipeline was updated to accommodate this by adding a new ZIO_TYPE_TRIM type and associated spa taskq. This new type makes is straight forward to add the platform specific TRIM/UNMAP calls to vdev_disk.c and vdev_file.c. These new ZIO_TYPE_TRIM zios are handled largely the same way as ZIO_TYPE_READs or ZIO_TYPE_WRITEs. This makes it possible to largely avoid changing the pipieline, one exception is that TRIM zio's may exceed the 16M block size limit since they contain no data. In addition to the manual `zpool trim` command, a background automatic TRIM was added and is controlled by the 'autotrim' property. It relies on the exact same infrastructure as the manual TRIM. However, instead of relying on the extents in a metaslab's ms_allocatable range tree, a ms_trim tree is kept per metaslab. When 'autotrim=on', ranges added back to the ms_allocatable tree are also added to the ms_free tree. The ms_free tree is then periodically consumed by an autotrim thread which systematically walks a top level vdev's metaslabs. Since the automatic TRIM will skip ranges it considers too small there is value in occasionally running a full `zpool trim`. This may occur when the freed blocks are small and not enough time was allowed to aggregate them. An automatic TRIM and a manual `zpool trim` may be run concurrently, in which case the automatic TRIM will yield to the manual TRIM. Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com> Contributions-by: Saso Kiselkov <saso.kiselkov@nexenta.com> Contributions-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Contributions-by: Chunwei Chen <tuxoko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #8419 Closes #598
2019-03-29 19:13:20 +03:00
spa_config_exit(spa, SCL_CONFIG, FTAG);
metaslab_disable(msp);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
mutex_enter(&msp->ms_lock);
if (!msp->ms_loaded && !msp->ms_loading)
unload_when_done = B_TRUE;
VERIFY0(metaslab_load(msp));
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
range_tree_walk(msp->ms_allocatable, vdev_initialize_range_add,
vd);
mutex_exit(&msp->ms_lock);
error = vdev_initialize_ranges(vd, deadbeef);
metaslab_enable(msp, B_TRUE, unload_when_done);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
spa_config_enter(spa, SCL_CONFIG, FTAG, RW_READER);
range_tree_vacate(vd->vdev_initialize_tree, NULL, NULL);
if (error != 0)
break;
}
spa_config_exit(spa, SCL_CONFIG, FTAG);
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
while (vd->vdev_initialize_inflight > 0) {
cv_wait(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_cv,
&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
}
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_io_lock);
range_tree_destroy(vd->vdev_initialize_tree);
vdev_initialize_block_free(deadbeef);
vd->vdev_initialize_tree = NULL;
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
if (!vd->vdev_initialize_exit_wanted) {
if (vdev_writeable(vd)) {
vdev_initialize_change_state(vd,
VDEV_INITIALIZE_COMPLETE);
} else if (vd->vdev_faulted) {
vdev_initialize_change_state(vd,
VDEV_INITIALIZE_CANCELED);
}
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
ASSERT(vd->vdev_initialize_thread != NULL ||
vd->vdev_initialize_inflight == 0);
/*
* Drop the vdev_initialize_lock while we sync out the
* txg since it's possible that a device might be trying to
* come online and must check to see if it needs to restart an
* initialization. That thread will be holding the spa_config_lock
* which would prevent the txg_wait_synced from completing.
*/
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
txg_wait_synced(spa_get_dsl(spa), 0);
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
vd->vdev_initialize_thread = NULL;
cv_broadcast(&vd->vdev_initialize_cv);
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
thread_exit();
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
/*
* Initiates a device. Caller must hold vdev_initialize_lock.
* Device must be a leaf and not already be initializing.
*/
void
vdev_initialize(vdev_t *vd)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock));
ASSERT(vd->vdev_ops->vdev_op_leaf);
ASSERT(vdev_is_concrete(vd));
ASSERT3P(vd->vdev_initialize_thread, ==, NULL);
ASSERT(!vd->vdev_detached);
ASSERT(!vd->vdev_initialize_exit_wanted);
ASSERT(!vd->vdev_top->vdev_removing);
vdev_initialize_change_state(vd, VDEV_INITIALIZE_ACTIVE);
vd->vdev_initialize_thread = thread_create(NULL, 0,
vdev_initialize_thread, vd, 0, &p0, TS_RUN, maxclsyspri);
}
/*
* Uninitializes a device. Caller must hold vdev_initialize_lock.
* Device must be a leaf and not already be initializing.
*/
void
vdev_uninitialize(vdev_t *vd)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock));
ASSERT(vd->vdev_ops->vdev_op_leaf);
ASSERT(vdev_is_concrete(vd));
ASSERT3P(vd->vdev_initialize_thread, ==, NULL);
ASSERT(!vd->vdev_detached);
ASSERT(!vd->vdev_initialize_exit_wanted);
ASSERT(!vd->vdev_top->vdev_removing);
vdev_initialize_change_state(vd, VDEV_INITIALIZE_NONE);
}
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
/*
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
* Wait for the initialize thread to be terminated (cancelled or stopped).
*/
static void
vdev_initialize_stop_wait_impl(vdev_t *vd)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock));
while (vd->vdev_initialize_thread != NULL)
cv_wait(&vd->vdev_initialize_cv, &vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
ASSERT3P(vd->vdev_initialize_thread, ==, NULL);
vd->vdev_initialize_exit_wanted = B_FALSE;
}
/*
* Wait for vdev initialize threads which were either to cleanly exit.
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
*/
void
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
vdev_initialize_stop_wait(spa_t *spa, list_t *vd_list)
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
{
(void) spa;
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
vdev_t *vd;
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&spa_namespace_lock));
while ((vd = list_remove_head(vd_list)) != NULL) {
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
vdev_initialize_stop_wait_impl(vd);
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
}
}
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
/*
* Stop initializing a device, with the resultant initializing state being
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
* tgt_state. For blocking behavior pass NULL for vd_list. Otherwise, when
* a list_t is provided the stopping vdev is inserted in to the list. Callers
* are then required to call vdev_initialize_stop_wait() to block for all the
* initialization threads to exit. The caller must hold vdev_initialize_lock
* and must not be writing to the spa config, as the initializing thread may
* try to enter the config as a reader before exiting.
*/
void
vdev_initialize_stop(vdev_t *vd, vdev_initializing_state_t tgt_state,
list_t *vd_list)
{
ASSERT(!spa_config_held(vd->vdev_spa, SCL_CONFIG|SCL_STATE, RW_WRITER));
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock));
ASSERT(vd->vdev_ops->vdev_op_leaf);
ASSERT(vdev_is_concrete(vd));
/*
* Allow cancel requests to proceed even if the initialize thread
* has stopped.
*/
if (vd->vdev_initialize_thread == NULL &&
tgt_state != VDEV_INITIALIZE_CANCELED) {
return;
}
vdev_initialize_change_state(vd, tgt_state);
vd->vdev_initialize_exit_wanted = B_TRUE;
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
if (vd_list == NULL) {
vdev_initialize_stop_wait_impl(vd);
} else {
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&spa_namespace_lock));
list_insert_tail(vd_list, vd);
}
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
static void
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
vdev_initialize_stop_all_impl(vdev_t *vd, vdev_initializing_state_t tgt_state,
list_t *vd_list)
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
{
if (vd->vdev_ops->vdev_op_leaf && vdev_is_concrete(vd)) {
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
vdev_initialize_stop(vd, tgt_state, vd_list);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
return;
}
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < vd->vdev_children; i++) {
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
vdev_initialize_stop_all_impl(vd->vdev_child[i], tgt_state,
vd_list);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
}
/*
* Convenience function to stop initializing of a vdev tree and set all
* initialize thread pointers to NULL.
*/
void
vdev_initialize_stop_all(vdev_t *vd, vdev_initializing_state_t tgt_state)
{
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
spa_t *spa = vd->vdev_spa;
list_t vd_list;
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&spa_namespace_lock));
list_create(&vd_list, sizeof (vdev_t),
offsetof(vdev_t, vdev_initialize_node));
vdev_initialize_stop_all_impl(vd, tgt_state, &vd_list);
vdev_initialize_stop_wait(spa, &vd_list);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
if (vd->vdev_spa->spa_sync_on) {
/* Make sure that our state has been synced to disk */
txg_wait_synced(spa_get_dsl(vd->vdev_spa), 0);
}
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
list_destroy(&vd_list);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
}
void
vdev_initialize_restart(vdev_t *vd)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&spa_namespace_lock));
ASSERT(!spa_config_held(vd->vdev_spa, SCL_ALL, RW_WRITER));
if (vd->vdev_leaf_zap != 0) {
mutex_enter(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
uint64_t initialize_state = VDEV_INITIALIZE_NONE;
int err = zap_lookup(vd->vdev_spa->spa_meta_objset,
vd->vdev_leaf_zap, VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_STATE,
sizeof (initialize_state), 1, &initialize_state);
ASSERT(err == 0 || err == ENOENT);
vd->vdev_initialize_state = initialize_state;
uint64_t timestamp = 0;
err = zap_lookup(vd->vdev_spa->spa_meta_objset,
vd->vdev_leaf_zap, VDEV_LEAF_ZAP_INITIALIZE_ACTION_TIME,
sizeof (timestamp), 1, &timestamp);
ASSERT(err == 0 || err == ENOENT);
vd->vdev_initialize_action_time = timestamp;
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
if (vd->vdev_initialize_state == VDEV_INITIALIZE_SUSPENDED ||
vd->vdev_offline) {
/* load progress for reporting, but don't resume */
VERIFY0(vdev_initialize_load(vd));
} else if (vd->vdev_initialize_state ==
VDEV_INITIALIZE_ACTIVE && vdev_writeable(vd) &&
!vd->vdev_top->vdev_removing &&
vd->vdev_initialize_thread == NULL) {
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
vdev_initialize(vd);
}
mutex_exit(&vd->vdev_initialize_lock);
}
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < vd->vdev_children; i++) {
vdev_initialize_restart(vd->vdev_child[i]);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vdev_initialize);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vdev_uninitialize);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vdev_initialize_stop);
zfs initialize performance enhancements PROBLEM ======== When invoking "zpool initialize" on a pool the command will create a thread to initialize each disk. Unfortunately, it does this serially across many transaction groups which can result in commands taking a long time to return to the user and may appear hung. The same thing is true when trying to suspend/cancel the operation. SOLUTION ========= This change refactors the way we invoke the initialize interface to ensure we can start or stop the intialization in just a few transaction groups. When stopping or cancelling a vdev initialization perform it in two phases. First signal each vdev initialization thread that it should exit, then after all threads have been signaled wait for them to exit. On a pool with 40 leaf vdevs this reduces the vdev initialize stop/cancel time from ~10 minutes to under a second. The reason for this is spa_vdev_initialize() no longer needs to wait on multiple full TXGs per leaf vdev being stopped. This commit additionally adds some missing checks for the passed "initialize_vdevs" input nvlist. The contents of the user provided input "initialize_vdevs" nvlist must be validated to ensure all values are uint64s. This is done in zfs_ioc_pool_initialize() in order to keep all of these checks in a single location. Updated the innvl and outnvl comments to match the formatting used for all other new sytle ioctls. Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Closes #8230
2018-12-19 19:20:39 +03:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vdev_initialize_stop_all);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vdev_initialize_stop_wait);
Add TRIM support UNMAP/TRIM support is a frequently-requested feature to help prevent performance from degrading on SSDs and on various other SAN-like storage back-ends. By issuing UNMAP/TRIM commands for sectors which are no longer allocated the underlying device can often more efficiently manage itself. This TRIM implementation is modeled on the `zpool initialize` feature which writes a pattern to all unallocated space in the pool. The new `zpool trim` command uses the same vdev_xlate() code to calculate what sectors are unallocated, the same per- vdev TRIM thread model and locking, and the same basic CLI for a consistent user experience. The core difference is that instead of writing a pattern it will issue UNMAP/TRIM commands for those extents. The zio pipeline was updated to accommodate this by adding a new ZIO_TYPE_TRIM type and associated spa taskq. This new type makes is straight forward to add the platform specific TRIM/UNMAP calls to vdev_disk.c and vdev_file.c. These new ZIO_TYPE_TRIM zios are handled largely the same way as ZIO_TYPE_READs or ZIO_TYPE_WRITEs. This makes it possible to largely avoid changing the pipieline, one exception is that TRIM zio's may exceed the 16M block size limit since they contain no data. In addition to the manual `zpool trim` command, a background automatic TRIM was added and is controlled by the 'autotrim' property. It relies on the exact same infrastructure as the manual TRIM. However, instead of relying on the extents in a metaslab's ms_allocatable range tree, a ms_trim tree is kept per metaslab. When 'autotrim=on', ranges added back to the ms_allocatable tree are also added to the ms_free tree. The ms_free tree is then periodically consumed by an autotrim thread which systematically walks a top level vdev's metaslabs. Since the automatic TRIM will skip ranges it considers too small there is value in occasionally running a full `zpool trim`. This may occur when the freed blocks are small and not enough time was allowed to aggregate them. An automatic TRIM and a manual `zpool trim` may be run concurrently, in which case the automatic TRIM will yield to the manual TRIM. Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Reviewed-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com> Contributions-by: Saso Kiselkov <saso.kiselkov@nexenta.com> Contributions-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Contributions-by: Chunwei Chen <tuxoko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #8419 Closes #598
2019-03-29 19:13:20 +03:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vdev_initialize_restart);
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
Cleanup: 64-bit kernel module parameters should use fixed width types Various module parameters such as `zfs_arc_max` were originally `uint64_t` on OpenSolaris/Illumos, but were changed to `unsigned long` for Linux compatibility because Linux's kernel default module parameter implementation did not support 64-bit types on 32-bit platforms. This caused problems when porting OpenZFS to Windows because its LLP64 memory model made `unsigned long` a 32-bit type on 64-bit, which created the undesireable situation that parameters that should accept 64-bit values could not on 64-bit Windows. Upon inspection, it turns out that the Linux kernel module parameter interface is extensible, such that we are allowed to define our own types. Rather than maintaining the original type change via hacks to to continue shrinking module parameters on 32-bit Linux, we implement support for 64-bit module parameters on Linux. After doing a review of all 64-bit kernel parameters (found via the man page and also proposed changes by Andrew Innes), the kernel module parameters fell into a few groups: Parameters that were originally 64-bit on Illumos: * dbuf_cache_max_bytes * dbuf_metadata_cache_max_bytes * l2arc_feed_min_ms * l2arc_feed_secs * l2arc_headroom * l2arc_headroom_boost * l2arc_write_boost * l2arc_write_max * metaslab_aliquot * metaslab_force_ganging * zfetch_array_rd_sz * zfs_arc_max * zfs_arc_meta_limit * zfs_arc_meta_min * zfs_arc_min * zfs_async_block_max_blocks * zfs_condense_max_obsolete_bytes * zfs_condense_min_mapping_bytes * zfs_deadman_checktime_ms * zfs_deadman_synctime_ms * zfs_initialize_chunk_size * zfs_initialize_value * zfs_lua_max_instrlimit * zfs_lua_max_memlimit * zil_slog_bulk Parameters that were originally 32-bit on Illumos: * zfs_per_txg_dirty_frees_percent Parameters that were originally `ssize_t` on Illumos: * zfs_immediate_write_sz Note that `ssize_t` is `int32_t` on 32-bit and `int64_t` on 64-bit. It has been upgraded to 64-bit. Parameters that were `long`/`unsigned long` because of Linux/FreeBSD influence: * l2arc_rebuild_blocks_min_l2size * zfs_key_max_salt_uses * zfs_max_log_walking * zfs_max_logsm_summary_length * zfs_metaslab_max_size_cache_sec * zfs_min_metaslabs_to_flush * zfs_multihost_interval * zfs_unflushed_log_block_max * zfs_unflushed_log_block_min * zfs_unflushed_log_block_pct * zfs_unflushed_max_mem_amt * zfs_unflushed_max_mem_ppm New parameters that do not exist in Illumos: * l2arc_trim_ahead * vdev_file_logical_ashift * vdev_file_physical_ashift * zfs_arc_dnode_limit * zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent * zfs_arc_dnode_reduce_percent * zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent * zfs_arc_sys_free * zfs_deadman_ziotime_ms * zfs_delete_blocks * zfs_history_output_max * zfs_livelist_max_entries * zfs_max_async_dedup_frees * zfs_max_nvlist_src_size * zfs_rebuild_max_segment * zfs_rebuild_vdev_limit * zfs_unflushed_log_txg_max * zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift * zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift * zfs_vnops_read_chunk_size * zvol_max_discard_blocks Rather than clutter the lists with commentary, the module parameters that need comments are repeated below. A few parameters were defined in Linux/FreeBSD specific code, where the use of ulong/long is not an issue for portability, so we leave them alone: * zfs_delete_blocks * zfs_key_max_salt_uses * zvol_max_discard_blocks The documentation for a few parameters was found to be incorrect: * zfs_deadman_checktime_ms - incorrectly documented as int * zfs_delete_blocks - not documented as Linux only * zfs_history_output_max - incorrectly documented as int * zfs_vnops_read_chunk_size - incorrectly documented as long * zvol_max_discard_blocks - incorrectly documented as ulong The documentation for these has been fixed, alongside the changes to document the switch to fixed width types. In addition, several kernel module parameters were percentages or held ashift values, so being 64-bit never made sense for them. They have been downgraded to 32-bit: * vdev_file_logical_ashift * vdev_file_physical_ashift * zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent * zfs_arc_dnode_reduce_percent * zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent * zfs_per_txg_dirty_frees_percent * zfs_unflushed_log_block_pct * zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift * zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift Of special note are `zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift` and `zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift`, which were already defined as `uint64_t`, and passed to the kernel as `ulong`. This is inherently buggy on big endian 32-bit Linux, since the values would not be written to the correct locations. 32-bit FreeBSD was unaffected because its sysctl code correctly treated this as a `uint64_t`. Lastly, a code comment suggests that `zfs_arc_sys_free` is Linux-specific, but there is nothing to indicate to me that it is Linux-specific. Nothing was done about that. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Original-patch-by: Andrew Innes <andrew.c12@gmail.com> Original-patch-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu> Closes #13984 Closes #14004
2022-10-03 22:06:54 +03:00
ZFS_MODULE_PARAM(zfs, zfs_, initialize_value, U64, ZMOD_RW,
OpenZFS 9102 - zfs should be able to initialize storage devices PROBLEM ======== The first access to a block incurs a performance penalty on some platforms (e.g. AWS's EBS, VMware VMDKs). Therefore we recommend that volumes are "thick provisioned", where supported by the platform (VMware). This can create a large delay in getting a new virtual machines up and running (or adding storage to an existing Engine). If the thick provision step is omitted, write performance will be suboptimal until all blocks on the LUN have been written. SOLUTION ========= This feature introduces a way to 'initialize' the disks at install or in the background to make sure we don't incur this first read penalty. When an entire LUN is added to ZFS, we make all space available immediately, and allow ZFS to find unallocated space and zero it out. This works with concurrent writes to arbitrary offsets, ensuring that we don't zero out something that has been (or is in the middle of being) written. This scheme can also be applied to existing pools (affecting only free regions on the vdev). Detailed design: - new subcommand:zpool initialize [-cs] <pool> [<vdev> ...] - start, suspend, or cancel initialization - Creates new open-context thread for each vdev - Thread iterates through all metaslabs in this vdev - Each metaslab: - select a metaslab - load the metaslab - mark the metaslab as being zeroed - walk all free ranges within that metaslab and translate them to ranges on the leaf vdev - issue a "zeroing" I/O on the leaf vdev that corresponds to a free range on the metaslab we're working on - continue until all free ranges for this metaslab have been "zeroed" - reset/unmark the metaslab being zeroed - if more metaslabs exist, then repeat above tasks. - if no more metaslabs, then we're done. - progress for the initialization is stored on-disk in the vdev’s leaf zap object. The following information is stored: - the last offset that has been initialized - the state of the initialization process (i.e. active, suspended, or canceled) - the start time for the initialization - progress is reported via the zpool status command and shows information for each of the vdevs that are initializing Porting notes: - Added zfs_initialize_value module parameter to set the pattern written by "zpool initialize". - Added zfs_vdev_{initializing,removal}_{min,max}_active module options. Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Wren Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9102 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/c3963210eb Closes #8230
2018-12-19 17:54:59 +03:00
"Value written during zpool initialize");
Add subcommand to wait for background zfs activity to complete Currently the best way to wait for the completion of a long-running operation in a pool, like a scrub or device removal, is to poll 'zpool status' and parse its output, which is neither efficient nor convenient. This change adds a 'wait' subcommand to the zpool command. When invoked, 'zpool wait' will block until a specified type of background activity completes. Currently, this subcommand can wait for any of the following: - Scrubs or resilvers to complete - Devices to initialized - Devices to be replaced - Devices to be removed - Checkpoints to be discarded - Background freeing to complete For example, a scrub that is in progress could be waited for by running zpool wait -t scrub <pool> This also adds a -w flag to the attach, checkpoint, initialize, replace, remove, and scrub subcommands. When used, this flag makes the operations kicked off by these subcommands synchronous instead of asynchronous. This functionality is implemented using a new ioctl. The type of activity to wait for is provided as input to the ioctl, and the ioctl blocks until all activity of that type has completed. An ioctl was used over other methods of kernel-userspace communiction primarily for the sake of portability. Porting Notes: This is ported from Delphix OS change DLPX-44432. The following changes were made while porting: - Added ZoL-style ioctl input declaration. - Reorganized error handling in zpool_initialize in libzfs to integrate better with changes made for TRIM support. - Fixed check for whether a checkpoint discard is in progress. Previously it also waited if the pool had a checkpoint, instead of just if a checkpoint was being discarded. - Exposed zfs_initialize_chunk_size as a ZoL-style tunable. - Updated more existing tests to make use of new 'zpool wait' functionality, tests that don't exist in Delphix OS. - Used existing ZoL tunable zfs_scan_suspend_progress, together with zinject, in place of a new tunable zfs_scan_max_blks_per_txg. - Added support for a non-integral interval argument to zpool wait. Future work: ZoL has support for trimming devices, which Delphix OS does not. In the future, 'zpool wait' could be extended to add the ability to wait for trim operations to complete. Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: John Gallagher <john.gallagher@delphix.com> Closes #9162
2019-09-14 04:09:06 +03:00
Cleanup: 64-bit kernel module parameters should use fixed width types Various module parameters such as `zfs_arc_max` were originally `uint64_t` on OpenSolaris/Illumos, but were changed to `unsigned long` for Linux compatibility because Linux's kernel default module parameter implementation did not support 64-bit types on 32-bit platforms. This caused problems when porting OpenZFS to Windows because its LLP64 memory model made `unsigned long` a 32-bit type on 64-bit, which created the undesireable situation that parameters that should accept 64-bit values could not on 64-bit Windows. Upon inspection, it turns out that the Linux kernel module parameter interface is extensible, such that we are allowed to define our own types. Rather than maintaining the original type change via hacks to to continue shrinking module parameters on 32-bit Linux, we implement support for 64-bit module parameters on Linux. After doing a review of all 64-bit kernel parameters (found via the man page and also proposed changes by Andrew Innes), the kernel module parameters fell into a few groups: Parameters that were originally 64-bit on Illumos: * dbuf_cache_max_bytes * dbuf_metadata_cache_max_bytes * l2arc_feed_min_ms * l2arc_feed_secs * l2arc_headroom * l2arc_headroom_boost * l2arc_write_boost * l2arc_write_max * metaslab_aliquot * metaslab_force_ganging * zfetch_array_rd_sz * zfs_arc_max * zfs_arc_meta_limit * zfs_arc_meta_min * zfs_arc_min * zfs_async_block_max_blocks * zfs_condense_max_obsolete_bytes * zfs_condense_min_mapping_bytes * zfs_deadman_checktime_ms * zfs_deadman_synctime_ms * zfs_initialize_chunk_size * zfs_initialize_value * zfs_lua_max_instrlimit * zfs_lua_max_memlimit * zil_slog_bulk Parameters that were originally 32-bit on Illumos: * zfs_per_txg_dirty_frees_percent Parameters that were originally `ssize_t` on Illumos: * zfs_immediate_write_sz Note that `ssize_t` is `int32_t` on 32-bit and `int64_t` on 64-bit. It has been upgraded to 64-bit. Parameters that were `long`/`unsigned long` because of Linux/FreeBSD influence: * l2arc_rebuild_blocks_min_l2size * zfs_key_max_salt_uses * zfs_max_log_walking * zfs_max_logsm_summary_length * zfs_metaslab_max_size_cache_sec * zfs_min_metaslabs_to_flush * zfs_multihost_interval * zfs_unflushed_log_block_max * zfs_unflushed_log_block_min * zfs_unflushed_log_block_pct * zfs_unflushed_max_mem_amt * zfs_unflushed_max_mem_ppm New parameters that do not exist in Illumos: * l2arc_trim_ahead * vdev_file_logical_ashift * vdev_file_physical_ashift * zfs_arc_dnode_limit * zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent * zfs_arc_dnode_reduce_percent * zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent * zfs_arc_sys_free * zfs_deadman_ziotime_ms * zfs_delete_blocks * zfs_history_output_max * zfs_livelist_max_entries * zfs_max_async_dedup_frees * zfs_max_nvlist_src_size * zfs_rebuild_max_segment * zfs_rebuild_vdev_limit * zfs_unflushed_log_txg_max * zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift * zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift * zfs_vnops_read_chunk_size * zvol_max_discard_blocks Rather than clutter the lists with commentary, the module parameters that need comments are repeated below. A few parameters were defined in Linux/FreeBSD specific code, where the use of ulong/long is not an issue for portability, so we leave them alone: * zfs_delete_blocks * zfs_key_max_salt_uses * zvol_max_discard_blocks The documentation for a few parameters was found to be incorrect: * zfs_deadman_checktime_ms - incorrectly documented as int * zfs_delete_blocks - not documented as Linux only * zfs_history_output_max - incorrectly documented as int * zfs_vnops_read_chunk_size - incorrectly documented as long * zvol_max_discard_blocks - incorrectly documented as ulong The documentation for these has been fixed, alongside the changes to document the switch to fixed width types. In addition, several kernel module parameters were percentages or held ashift values, so being 64-bit never made sense for them. They have been downgraded to 32-bit: * vdev_file_logical_ashift * vdev_file_physical_ashift * zfs_arc_dnode_limit_percent * zfs_arc_dnode_reduce_percent * zfs_arc_meta_limit_percent * zfs_per_txg_dirty_frees_percent * zfs_unflushed_log_block_pct * zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift * zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift Of special note are `zfs_vdev_max_auto_ashift` and `zfs_vdev_min_auto_ashift`, which were already defined as `uint64_t`, and passed to the kernel as `ulong`. This is inherently buggy on big endian 32-bit Linux, since the values would not be written to the correct locations. 32-bit FreeBSD was unaffected because its sysctl code correctly treated this as a `uint64_t`. Lastly, a code comment suggests that `zfs_arc_sys_free` is Linux-specific, but there is nothing to indicate to me that it is Linux-specific. Nothing was done about that. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Original-patch-by: Andrew Innes <andrew.c12@gmail.com> Original-patch-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu> Closes #13984 Closes #14004
2022-10-03 22:06:54 +03:00
ZFS_MODULE_PARAM(zfs, zfs_, initialize_chunk_size, U64, ZMOD_RW,
Add subcommand to wait for background zfs activity to complete Currently the best way to wait for the completion of a long-running operation in a pool, like a scrub or device removal, is to poll 'zpool status' and parse its output, which is neither efficient nor convenient. This change adds a 'wait' subcommand to the zpool command. When invoked, 'zpool wait' will block until a specified type of background activity completes. Currently, this subcommand can wait for any of the following: - Scrubs or resilvers to complete - Devices to initialized - Devices to be replaced - Devices to be removed - Checkpoints to be discarded - Background freeing to complete For example, a scrub that is in progress could be waited for by running zpool wait -t scrub <pool> This also adds a -w flag to the attach, checkpoint, initialize, replace, remove, and scrub subcommands. When used, this flag makes the operations kicked off by these subcommands synchronous instead of asynchronous. This functionality is implemented using a new ioctl. The type of activity to wait for is provided as input to the ioctl, and the ioctl blocks until all activity of that type has completed. An ioctl was used over other methods of kernel-userspace communiction primarily for the sake of portability. Porting Notes: This is ported from Delphix OS change DLPX-44432. The following changes were made while porting: - Added ZoL-style ioctl input declaration. - Reorganized error handling in zpool_initialize in libzfs to integrate better with changes made for TRIM support. - Fixed check for whether a checkpoint discard is in progress. Previously it also waited if the pool had a checkpoint, instead of just if a checkpoint was being discarded. - Exposed zfs_initialize_chunk_size as a ZoL-style tunable. - Updated more existing tests to make use of new 'zpool wait' functionality, tests that don't exist in Delphix OS. - Used existing ZoL tunable zfs_scan_suspend_progress, together with zinject, in place of a new tunable zfs_scan_max_blks_per_txg. - Added support for a non-integral interval argument to zpool wait. Future work: ZoL has support for trimming devices, which Delphix OS does not. In the future, 'zpool wait' could be extended to add the ability to wait for trim operations to complete. Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: John Gallagher <john.gallagher@delphix.com> Closes #9162
2019-09-14 04:09:06 +03:00
"Size in bytes of writes by zpool initialize");