mirror_zfs/tests/zfs-tests/cmd/stride_dd.c

344 lines
7.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
/*
* This file and its contents are supplied under the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License ("CDDL"), version 1.0.
* You may only use this file in accordance with the terms of version
* 1.0 of the CDDL.
*
* A full copy of the text of the CDDL should have accompanied this
* source. A copy of the CDDL is also available via the Internet at
* http://www.illumos.org/license/CDDL.
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2018 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
*/
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
static int alignment = 0;
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
static int bsize = 0;
static int count = 0;
static char *ifile = NULL;
static char *ofile = NULL;
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
static off_t stride = 1;
static off_t seek = 0;
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
static int seekbytes = 0;
static int if_o_direct = 0;
static int of_o_direct = 0;
static int skip = 0;
static int skipbytes = 0;
static int entire_file = 0;
static const char *execname = "stride_dd";
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
static void usage(void);
static void parse_options(int argc, char *argv[]);
static void
usage(void)
{
(void) fprintf(stderr,
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
"usage: %s -i inputfile -o outputfile -b blocksize [-c count]\n"
" [-s stride] [-k seekblocks] [-K seekbytes]\n"
" [-a alignment] [-d if_o_direct] [-D of_o_direct]\n"
" [-p skipblocks] [-P skipbytes] [-e entire_file]\n"
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
"\n"
"Simplified version of dd that supports the stride option.\n"
"A stride of n means that for each block written, n - 1 blocks\n"
"are skipped in both the input and output file. A stride of 1\n"
"means that blocks are read and written consecutively.\n"
"All numeric parameters must be integers.\n"
"\n"
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
" inputfile: File to read from\n"
" outputfile: File to write to\n"
" blocksize: Size of each block to read/write\n"
" count: Number of blocks to read/write (Required"
" unless -e is used)\n"
" stride: Read/write a block then skip (stride - 1) blocks"
"\n"
" seekblocks: Number of blocks to skip at start of output\n"
" seekbytes: Treat seekblocks as byte count\n"
" alignment: Alignment passed to posix_memalign() (default"
" PAGE_SIZE)\n"
" if_o_direct: Use O_DIRECT with inputfile (default no O_DIRECT)"
"\n"
" of_o_direct: Use O_DIRECT with outputfile (default no "
" O_DIRECT)\n"
" skipblocks: Number of blocks to skip at start of input "
" (default 0)\n"
" skipbytes: Treat skipblocks as byte count\n"
" entire_file: When used the entire inputfile will be read and"
" count will be ignored\n",
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
execname);
(void) exit(1);
}
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
/*
* posix_memalign() only allows for alignments which are postive, powers of two
* and a multiple of sizeof (void *).
*/
static int
invalid_alignment(int alignment)
{
if ((alignment < 0) || (alignment & (alignment - 1)) ||
((alignment % sizeof (void *)))) {
(void) fprintf(stderr,
"Alignment must be a postive, power of two, and multiple "
"of sizeof (void *).\n");
return (1);
}
return (0);
}
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
static void
parse_options(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int c;
int errflag = 0;
execname = argv[0];
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
alignment = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
extern char *optarg;
extern int optind, optopt;
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "a:b:c:deDi:o:s:k:Kp:P")) != -1) {
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
switch (c) {
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
case 'a':
alignment = atoi(optarg);
break;
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
case 'b':
bsize = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'c':
count = atoi(optarg);
break;
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
case 'd':
if_o_direct = 1;
break;
case 'e':
entire_file = 1;
break;
case 'D':
of_o_direct = 1;
break;
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
case 'i':
ifile = optarg;
break;
case 'o':
ofile = optarg;
break;
case 's':
stride = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'k':
seek = atoi(optarg);
break;
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
case 'K':
seekbytes = 1;
break;
case 'p':
skip = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'P':
skipbytes = 1;
break;
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
case ':':
(void) fprintf(stderr,
"Option -%c requires an operand\n", optopt);
errflag++;
break;
case '?':
default:
(void) fprintf(stderr,
"Unrecognized option: -%c\n", optopt);
errflag++;
break;
}
if (errflag) {
(void) usage();
}
}
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
if (bsize <= 0 || stride <= 0 || ifile == NULL || ofile == NULL ||
seek < 0 || invalid_alignment(alignment) || skip < 0) {
(void) fprintf(stderr,
"Required parameter(s) missing or invalid.\n");
(void) usage();
}
if (count <= 0 && entire_file == 0) {
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
(void) fprintf(stderr,
"Required parameter(s) missing or invalid.\n");
(void) usage();
}
}
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
static void
read_entire_file(int ifd, int ofd, void *buf)
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
{
int c;
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
do {
c = read(ifd, buf, bsize);
if (c < 0) {
perror("read");
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
exit(2);
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
} else if (c != 0) {
c = write(ofd, buf, bsize);
if (c < 0) {
perror("write");
exit(2);
}
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
}
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
if (stride > 1) {
if (lseek(ifd, (stride - 1) * bsize, SEEK_CUR) == -1) {
perror("input lseek");
exit(2);
}
if (lseek(ofd, (stride - 1) * bsize, SEEK_CUR) == -1) {
perror("output lseek");
exit(2);
}
}
} while (c != 0);
}
static void
read_on_count(int ifd, int ofd, void *buf)
{
int i;
int c;
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
c = read(ifd, buf, bsize);
if (c != bsize) {
if (c < 0) {
perror("read");
} else {
(void) fprintf(stderr,
"%s: unexpected short read, read %d "
"bytes, expected %d\n", execname,
c, bsize);
}
exit(2);
}
c = write(ofd, buf, bsize);
if (c != bsize) {
if (c < 0) {
perror("write");
} else {
(void) fprintf(stderr,
"%s: unexpected short write, wrote %d "
"bytes, expected %d\n", execname,
c, bsize);
}
exit(2);
}
if (stride > 1) {
if (lseek(ifd, (stride - 1) * bsize, SEEK_CUR) == -1) {
perror("input lseek");
exit(2);
}
if (lseek(ofd, (stride - 1) * bsize, SEEK_CUR) == -1) {
perror("output lseek");
exit(2);
}
}
}
Adding Direct IO Support Adding O_DIRECT support to ZFS to bypass the ARC for writes/reads. O_DIRECT support in ZFS will always ensure there is coherency between buffered and O_DIRECT IO requests. This ensures that all IO requests, whether buffered or direct, will see the same file contents at all times. Just as in other FS's , O_DIRECT does not imply O_SYNC. While data is written directly to VDEV disks, metadata will not be synced until the associated TXG is synced. For both O_DIRECT read and write request the offset and request sizes, at a minimum, must be PAGE_SIZE aligned. In the event they are not, then EINVAL is returned unless the direct property is set to always (see below). For O_DIRECT writes: The request also must be block aligned (recordsize) or the write request will take the normal (buffered) write path. In the event that request is block aligned and a cached copy of the buffer in the ARC, then it will be discarded from the ARC forcing all further reads to retrieve the data from disk. For O_DIRECT reads: The only alignment restrictions are PAGE_SIZE alignment. In the event that the requested data is in buffered (in the ARC) it will just be copied from the ARC into the user buffer. For both O_DIRECT writes and reads the O_DIRECT flag will be ignored in the event that file contents are mmap'ed. In this case, all requests that are at least PAGE_SIZE aligned will just fall back to the buffered paths. If the request however is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, EINVAL will be returned as always regardless if the file's contents are mmap'ed. Since O_DIRECT writes go through the normal ZIO pipeline, the following operations are supported just as with normal buffered writes: Checksum Compression Encryption Erasure Coding There is one caveat for the data integrity of O_DIRECT writes that is distinct for each of the OS's supported by ZFS. FreeBSD - FreeBSD is able to place user pages under write protection so any data in the user buffers and written directly down to the VDEV disks is guaranteed to not change. There is no concern with data integrity and O_DIRECT writes. Linux - Linux is not able to place anonymous user pages under write protection. Because of this, if the user decides to manipulate the page contents while the write operation is occurring, data integrity can not be guaranteed. However, there is a module parameter `zfs_vdev_direct_write_verify` that controls the if a O_DIRECT writes that can occur to a top-level VDEV before a checksum verify is run before the contents of the I/O buffer are committed to disk. In the event of a checksum verification failure the write will return EIO. The number of O_DIRECT write checksum verification errors can be observed by doing `zpool status -d`, which will list all verification errors that have occurred on a top-level VDEV. Along with `zpool status`, a ZED event will be issues as `dio_verify` when a checksum verification error occurs. ZVOLs and dedup is not currently supported with Direct I/O. A new dataset property `direct` has been added with the following 3 allowable values: disabled - Accepts O_DIRECT flag, but silently ignores it and treats the request as a buffered IO request. standard - Follows the alignment restrictions outlined above for write/read IO requests when the O_DIRECT flag is used. always - Treats every write/read IO request as though it passed O_DIRECT and will do O_DIRECT if the alignment restrictions are met otherwise will redirect through the ARC. This property will not allow a request to fail. There is also a module parameter zfs_dio_enabled that can be used to force all reads and writes through the ARC. By setting this module parameter to 0, it mimics as if the direct dataset property is set to disabled. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf@llnl.gov> Closes #10018
2024-09-14 23:47:59 +03:00
}
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int ifd;
int ofd;
int ifd_flags = O_RDONLY;
int ofd_flags = O_WRONLY | O_CREAT;
void *buf;
parse_options(argc, argv);
if (if_o_direct)
ifd_flags |= O_DIRECT;
if (of_o_direct)
ofd_flags |= O_DIRECT;
ifd = open(ifile, ifd_flags);
if (ifd == -1) {
(void) fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: ", execname, ifile);
perror("open");
exit(2);
}
ofd = open(ofile, ofd_flags, 0666);
if (ofd == -1) {
(void) fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: ", execname, ofile);
perror("open");
exit(2);
}
/*
* We use valloc because some character block devices expect a
* page-aligned buffer.
*/
int err = posix_memalign(&buf, alignment, bsize);
if (err != 0) {
(void) fprintf(stderr,
"%s: %s\n", execname, strerror(err));
exit(2);
}
if (skip > 0) {
int skipamt = skipbytes == 1 ? skip : skip * bsize;
if (lseek(ifd, skipamt, SEEK_CUR) == -1) {
perror("input lseek");
exit(2);
}
}
if (seek > 0) {
int seekamt = seekbytes == 1 ? seek : seek * bsize;
if (lseek(ofd, seekamt, SEEK_CUR) == -1) {
perror("output lseek");
exit(2);
}
}
if (entire_file == 1)
read_entire_file(ifd, ofd, buf);
else
read_on_count(ifd, ofd, buf);
Implement Redacted Send/Receive Redacted send/receive allows users to send subsets of their data to a target system. One possible use case for this feature is to not transmit sensitive information to a data warehousing, test/dev, or analytics environment. Another is to save space by not replicating unimportant data within a given dataset, for example in backup tools like zrepl. Redacted send/receive is a three-stage process. First, a clone (or clones) is made of the snapshot to be sent to the target. In this clone (or clones), all unnecessary or unwanted data is removed or modified. This clone is then snapshotted to create the "redaction snapshot" (or snapshots). Second, the new zfs redact command is used to create a redaction bookmark. The redaction bookmark stores the list of blocks in a snapshot that were modified by the redaction snapshot(s). Finally, the redaction bookmark is passed as a parameter to zfs send. When sending to the snapshot that was redacted, the redaction bookmark is used to filter out blocks that contain sensitive or unwanted information, and those blocks are not included in the send stream. When sending from the redaction bookmark, the blocks it contains are considered as candidate blocks in addition to those blocks in the destination snapshot that were modified since the creation_txg of the redaction bookmark. This step is necessary to allow the target to rehydrate data in the case where some blocks are accidentally or unnecessarily modified in the redaction snapshot. The changes to bookmarks to enable fast space estimation involve adding deadlists to bookmarks. There is also logic to manage the life cycles of these deadlists. The new size estimation process operates in cases where previously an accurate estimate could not be provided. In those cases, a send is performed where no data blocks are read, reducing the runtime significantly and providing a byte-accurate size estimate. Reviewed-by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Zhakarov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> Closes #7958
2019-06-19 19:48:13 +03:00
free(buf);
(void) close(ofd);
(void) close(ifd);
return (0);
}