c/mirror_zfs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_zfs.git synced 2024-11-18 02:20:59 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
36811b4430
mirror_zfs/Makefile.am

54 lines
1.6 KiB
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-02 01:37:44 +04:00
include $(top_srcdir)/config/rpm.am
Support custom build directories One of the neat tricks an autoconf style project is capable of is allow configurion/building in a directory other than the source directory. The major advantage to this is that you can build the project various different ways while making changes in a single source tree. For example, this project is designed to work on various different Linux distributions each of which work slightly differently. This means that changes need to verified on each of those supported distributions perferably before the change is committed to the public git repo. Using nfs and custom build directories makes this much easier. I now have a single source tree in nfs mounted on several different systems each running a supported distribution. When I make a change to the source base I suspect may break things I can concurrently build from the same source on all the systems each in their own subdirectory. wget -c http://github.com/downloads/behlendorf/spl/spl-x.y.z.tar.gz tar -xzf spl-x.y.z.tar.gz cd spl-x-y-z ------------------------- run concurrently ---------------------- <ubuntu system> <fedora system> <debian system> <rhel6 system> mkdir ubuntu mkdir fedora mkdir debian mkdir rhel6 cd ubuntu cd fedora cd debian cd rhel6 ../configure ../configure ../configure ../configure make make make make make check make check make check make check This is something the project has almost supported for a long time but finishing this support should save me lots of time.
2010-09-02 23:12:39 +04:00
include $(top_srcdir)/config/deb.am
include $(top_srcdir)/config/tgz.am
Add make rule for building Arch Linux packages Added the necessary build infrastructure for building packages compatible with the Arch Linux distribution. As such, one can now run: $ ./configure $ make pkg # Alternatively, one can run 'make arch' as well on an Arch Linux machine to create two binary packages compatible with the pacman package manager, one for the spl userland utilties and another for the spl kernel modules. The new packages can then be installed by running: # pacman -U $package.pkg.tar.xz In addition, source-only packages suitable for an Arch Linux chroot environment or remote builder can also be built using the 'sarch' make rule. NOTE: Since the source dist tarball is created on the fly from the head of the build tree, it's MD5 hash signature will be continually influx. As a result, the md5sum variable was intentionally omitted from the PKGBUILD files, and the '--skipinteg' makepkg option is used. This may or may not have any serious security implications, as the source tarball is not being downloaded from an outside source. Signed-off-by: Prakash Surya <surya1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes: #68
2011-12-07 05:33:51 +04:00
include $(top_srcdir)/config/arch.am
Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-02 01:37:44 +04:00
if CONFIG_USER
USER_DIR = lib cmd scripts
endif
if CONFIG_KERNEL
KERNEL_DIR = module include
endif
SUBDIRS = $(USER_DIR) $(KERNEL_DIR)
Build system and packaging (RPM support) An update to the build system to properly support all commonly used Makefile targets these include: make all # Build everything make install # Install everything make clean # Clean up build products make distclean # Clean up everything make dist # Create package tarball make srpm # Create package source RPM make rpm # Create package binary RPMs make tags # Create ctags and etags for everything Extra care was taken to ensure that the source RPMs are fully rebuildable against Fedora/RHEL/Chaos kernels. To build binary RPMs from the source RPM for your system simply run: rpmbuild --rebuild spl-x.y.z-1.src.rpm This will produce two binary RPMs with correct 'requires' dependencies for your kernel. One will contain all spl modules and support utilities, the other is a devel package for compiling additional kernel modules which are dependant on the spl. spl-x.y.z-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm spl-devel-x.y.2-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm
2009-03-05 20:08:07 +03:00
Remove spl-x.y.z.zip creation in 'make dist' Do no create a spl-x.y.z.zip file as part of 'make dist'. Simply create the standard spl-x.y.z.tar.gz file.
2010-09-03 00:15:20 +04:00
AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = foreign
Add Debian and Slackware style packaging via alien The long term fix for Debian and Slackware style packaging is to add native support for building these packages. Unfortunately, that is a large chunk of work I don't have time for right now. That said it would be nice to have at least basic packages for these distributions. As a quick short/medium term solution I've settled on using alien to convert the RPM packages to DEB or TGZ style packages. The build system has been updated with the following build targets which will first build RPM packages and then convert them as needed to the target package type: make rpm: Create .rpm packages make deb: Create .deb packages make tgz: Create .tgz packages make pkg: Create the right package type for your distribution The solution comes with lot of caveats and your mileage may vary. But basically the big limitations are that the resulting packages: 1) Will not have the correct dependency information. 2) Will not not include the kernel version in the release. 3) Will not handle all differences between distributions. But the resulting packages should be easy to install and remove from your system and take care of running 'depmod -a' and such. As I said at the top this is not the right long term solution. If any of the upstream distribution maintainers want to jump in and help do this right for their distribution I'd love the help.
2010-07-27 21:19:44 +04:00
EXTRA_DIST = autogen.sh spl.spec.in spl-modules.spec.in META DISCLAIMER
EXTRA_DIST += config/config.awk config/rpm.am config/deb.am config/tgz.am
Allow spl_config.h to be included by dependant packages (updated) We need dependent packages to be able to include spl_config.h to build properly. This was partially solved in commit 0cbaeb1 by using AH_BOTTOM to #undef common #defines (PACKAGE, VERSION, etc) which autoconf always adds and cannot be easily removed. This solution works as long as the spl_config.h is included before your projects config.h. That turns out to be easier said than done. In particular, this is a problem when your package includes its config.h using the -include gcc option which ensures the first thing included is your config.h. To handle all cases cleanly I have removed the AH_BOTTOM hack and replaced it with an AC_CONFIG_HEADERS command. This command runs immediately after spl_config.h is written and with a little awk-foo it strips the offending #defines from the file. This eliminates the problem entirely and makes header safe for inclusion. Also in this change I have removed the few places in the code where spl_config.h is included. It is now added to the gcc compile line to ensure the config results are always available. Finally, I have also disabled the verbose kernel builds. If you want them back you can always build with 'make V=1'. Since things are working now they don't need to be on by default.
2010-03-23 00:45:33 +03:00
noinst_HEADERS = spl_config.h
Initial commit. All spl source written up to this point wrapped in an initial reasonable autoconf style build system. This does not yet build but the configure system does appear to work properly and integrate with the kernel. Hopefully the next commit gets us back to a buildable version we can run the test suite against. git-svn-id: https://outreach.scidac.gov/svn/spl/trunk@1 7e1ea52c-4ff2-0310-8f11-9dd32ca42a1c
2008-02-26 23:36:04 +03:00
Build system and packaging (RPM support) An update to the build system to properly support all commonly used Makefile targets these include: make all # Build everything make install # Install everything make clean # Clean up build products make distclean # Clean up everything make dist # Create package tarball make srpm # Create package source RPM make rpm # Create package binary RPMs make tags # Create ctags and etags for everything Extra care was taken to ensure that the source RPMs are fully rebuildable against Fedora/RHEL/Chaos kernels. To build binary RPMs from the source RPM for your system simply run: rpmbuild --rebuild spl-x.y.z-1.src.rpm This will produce two binary RPMs with correct 'requires' dependencies for your kernel. One will contain all spl modules and support utilities, the other is a devel package for compiling additional kernel modules which are dependant on the spl. spl-x.y.z-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm spl-devel-x.y.2-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm
2009-03-05 20:08:07 +03:00
distclean-local::
-$(RM) -R autom4te*.cache
-find . \( -name SCCS -o -name BitKeeper -o -name .svn -o -name CVS \
-o -name .pc -o -name .hg -o -name .git \) -prune -o \
\( -name '*.orig' -o -name '*.rej' -o -name '*~' \
-o -name '*.bak' -o -name '#*#' -o -name '.*.orig' \
-o -name '.*.rej' -o -name 'aclocal.m4' -o -size 0 \
-o -name '*%' -o -name '.*.cmd' -o -name 'core' \
Ensure *.order and *.markers build products are removed by distclean rule.
2009-11-21 03:01:00 +03:00
-o -name 'Makefile' -o -name '$(LINUX_SYMBOLS)' \
-o -name '*.order' -o -name '*.markers' \) \
Build system and packaging (RPM support) An update to the build system to properly support all commonly used Makefile targets these include: make all # Build everything make install # Install everything make clean # Clean up build products make distclean # Clean up everything make dist # Create package tarball make srpm # Create package source RPM make rpm # Create package binary RPMs make tags # Create ctags and etags for everything Extra care was taken to ensure that the source RPMs are fully rebuildable against Fedora/RHEL/Chaos kernels. To build binary RPMs from the source RPM for your system simply run: rpmbuild --rebuild spl-x.y.z-1.src.rpm This will produce two binary RPMs with correct 'requires' dependencies for your kernel. One will contain all spl modules and support utilities, the other is a devel package for compiling additional kernel modules which are dependant on the spl. spl-x.y.z-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm spl-devel-x.y.2-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm
2009-03-05 20:08:07 +03:00
-type f -print | xargs $(RM)
Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-02 01:37:44 +04:00
if CONFIG_KERNEL
Build system and packaging (RPM support) An update to the build system to properly support all commonly used Makefile targets these include: make all # Build everything make install # Install everything make clean # Clean up build products make distclean # Clean up everything make dist # Create package tarball make srpm # Create package source RPM make rpm # Create package binary RPMs make tags # Create ctags and etags for everything Extra care was taken to ensure that the source RPMs are fully rebuildable against Fedora/RHEL/Chaos kernels. To build binary RPMs from the source RPM for your system simply run: rpmbuild --rebuild spl-x.y.z-1.src.rpm This will produce two binary RPMs with correct 'requires' dependencies for your kernel. One will contain all spl modules and support utilities, the other is a devel package for compiling additional kernel modules which are dependant on the spl. spl-x.y.z-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm spl-devel-x.y.2-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm
2009-03-05 20:08:07 +03:00
install-data-local:
Add the release component to headers When the original build system code was added the release component was accidentally omited from the development header install path. This patch adds the missing path component so it's always clear exactly what release your compiling against. Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
2012-01-18 04:14:35 +04:00
release=$(SPL_META_VERSION)-$(SPL_META_RELEASE); \
instdest=$(DESTDIR)/usr/src/spl-$$release/$(LINUX_VERSION); \
echo "$$release" >$$instdest/spl.release; \
Packaging improvements for RHEL and SLES (part 2) - Allow checking for exported symbols in both Module.symvers and Module.symvers. My stock SLES kernel ships an objects directory with Module.symvers, yet produces a Module.symvers in the local build directory.
2009-06-16 22:34:28 +04:00
for instfile in $(noinst_HEADERS) module/$(LINUX_SYMBOLS); do \
Packaging improvements for RHEL and SLES - Properly honor --prefix in build system and rpm spec file. - Add '--define require_kdir' to spec file to support building rpms against kernel sources installed in non-default locations. - Add '--define require_kobj' to spec file to support building rpms against kernel object installed in non-default locations. - Stop suppressing errors in autogen.sh script. - Improved logic to detect missing kernel objects when they are not located with the source. This is the common case for SLES as well as in-tree chaos kernel builds and is done to simply support for multiple arches. - Moved spl-devel build products to /usr/src/spl-<version>, a spl symlink is created to reference the last installed version.
2009-06-16 21:44:59 +04:00
$(INSTALL) -D $$instfile $$instdest/$$instfile; \
done
Simplify rpm build rules, added config/rpm.am. Distro friendly changes such that the kernel modules are packaged seperately.
2009-07-02 01:37:44 +04:00
endif
Build system and packaging (RPM support) An update to the build system to properly support all commonly used Makefile targets these include: make all # Build everything make install # Install everything make clean # Clean up build products make distclean # Clean up everything make dist # Create package tarball make srpm # Create package source RPM make rpm # Create package binary RPMs make tags # Create ctags and etags for everything Extra care was taken to ensure that the source RPMs are fully rebuildable against Fedora/RHEL/Chaos kernels. To build binary RPMs from the source RPM for your system simply run: rpmbuild --rebuild spl-x.y.z-1.src.rpm This will produce two binary RPMs with correct 'requires' dependencies for your kernel. One will contain all spl modules and support utilities, the other is a devel package for compiling additional kernel modules which are dependant on the spl. spl-x.y.z-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm spl-devel-x.y.2-1_<kernel version>.x86_64.rpm
2009-03-05 20:08:07 +03:00
ctags:
$(RM) $(top_srcdir)/tags
find $(top_srcdir) -name .git -prune -o -name '*.[hc]' | xargs ctags
etags:
$(RM) $(top_srcdir)/TAGS
find $(top_srcdir) -name .pc -prune -o -name '*.[hc]' | xargs etags -a
tags: ctags etags
Add Debian and Slackware style packaging via alien The long term fix for Debian and Slackware style packaging is to add native support for building these packages. Unfortunately, that is a large chunk of work I don't have time for right now. That said it would be nice to have at least basic packages for these distributions. As a quick short/medium term solution I've settled on using alien to convert the RPM packages to DEB or TGZ style packages. The build system has been updated with the following build targets which will first build RPM packages and then convert them as needed to the target package type: make rpm: Create .rpm packages make deb: Create .deb packages make tgz: Create .tgz packages make pkg: Create the right package type for your distribution The solution comes with lot of caveats and your mileage may vary. But basically the big limitations are that the resulting packages: 1) Will not have the correct dependency information. 2) Will not not include the kernel version in the release. 3) Will not handle all differences between distributions. But the resulting packages should be easy to install and remove from your system and take care of running 'depmod -a' and such. As I said at the top this is not the right long term solution. If any of the upstream distribution maintainers want to jump in and help do this right for their distribution I'd love the help.
2010-07-27 21:19:44 +04:00
pkg: @DEFAULT_PACKAGE@
pkg-modules: @DEFAULT_PACKAGE@-modules
pkg-utils: @DEFAULT_PACKAGE@-utils
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink