mirror_zfs/lib/libzfs/libzfs_status.c

509 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License (the "License").
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
*
* You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
* or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions
* and limitations under the License.
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
* If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
* fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying
* information: Portions Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Copyright (c) 2005, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2012 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2013 Steven Hartland. All rights reserved.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
/*
* This file contains the functions which analyze the status of a pool. This
* include both the status of an active pool, as well as the status exported
* pools. Returns one of the ZPOOL_STATUS_* defines describing the status of
* the pool. This status is independent (to a certain degree) from the state of
* the pool. A pool's state describes only whether or not it is capable of
* providing the necessary fault tolerance for data. The status describes the
* overall status of devices. A pool that is online can still have a device
* that is experiencing errors.
*
* Only a subset of the possible faults can be detected using 'zpool status',
* and not all possible errors correspond to a FMA message ID. The explanation
* is left up to the caller, depending on whether it is a live pool or an
* import.
*/
#include <libzfs.h>
#include <libzutil.h>
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
#include <stdlib.h>
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
Add libtpool (thread pools) OpenZFS provides a library called tpool which implements thread pools for user space applications. Porting this library means the zpool utility no longer needs to borrow the kernel mutex and taskq interfaces from libzpool. This code was updated to use the tpool library which behaves in a very similar fashion. Porting libtpool was relatively straight forward and minimal modifications were needed. The core changes were: * Fully convert the library to use pthreads. * Updated signal handling. * lmalloc/lfree converted to calloc/free * Implemented portable pthread_attr_clone() function. Finally, update the build system such that libzpool.so is no longer linked in to zfs(8), zpool(8), etc. All that is required is libzfs to which the zcommon soures were added (which is the way it always should have been). Removing the libzpool dependency resulted in several build issues which needed to be resolved. * Moved zfeature support to module/zcommon/zfeature_common.c * Moved ratelimiting to to module/zfs/zfs_ratelimit.c * Moved get_system_hostid() to lib/libspl/gethostid.c * Removed use of cmn_err() in zcommon source * Removed dprintf_setup() call from zpool_main.c and zfs_main.c * Removed highbit() and lowbit() * Removed unnecessary library dependencies from Makefiles * Removed fletcher-4 kstat in user space * Added sha2 support explicitly to libzfs * Added highbit64() and lowbit64() to zpool_util.c Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #6442
2017-08-10 01:31:08 +03:00
#include <sys/systeminfo.h>
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
#include "libzfs_impl.h"
#include "zfeature_common.h"
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Message ID table. This must be kept in sync with the ZPOOL_STATUS_* defines
* in include/libzfs.h. Note that there are some status results which go past
* the end of this table, and hence have no associated message ID.
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*/
static char *zfs_msgid_table[] = {
"ZFS-8000-14", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_CACHE */
"ZFS-8000-2Q", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_MISSING_DEV_R */
"ZFS-8000-3C", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_MISSING_DEV_NR */
"ZFS-8000-4J", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_LABEL_R */
"ZFS-8000-5E", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_LABEL_NR */
"ZFS-8000-6X", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_BAD_GUID_SUM */
"ZFS-8000-72", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_POOL */
"ZFS-8000-8A", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_DATA */
"ZFS-8000-9P", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_FAILING_DEV */
"ZFS-8000-A5", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_VERSION_NEWER */
"ZFS-8000-EY", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_HOSTID_MISMATCH */
"ZFS-8000-EY", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_HOSTID_ACTIVE */
"ZFS-8000-EY", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_HOSTID_REQUIRED */
"ZFS-8000-HC", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_IO_FAILURE_WAIT */
"ZFS-8000-JQ", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_IO_FAILURE_CONTINUE */
"ZFS-8000-MM", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_IO_FAILURE_MMP */
"ZFS-8000-K4", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_BAD_LOG */
"ZFS-8000-ER", /* ZPOOL_STATUS_ERRATA */
/*
* The following results have no message ID.
* ZPOOL_STATUS_UNSUP_FEAT_READ
* ZPOOL_STATUS_UNSUP_FEAT_WRITE
* ZPOOL_STATUS_FAULTED_DEV_R
* ZPOOL_STATUS_FAULTED_DEV_NR
* ZPOOL_STATUS_VERSION_OLDER
* ZPOOL_STATUS_FEAT_DISABLED
* ZPOOL_STATUS_RESILVERING
* ZPOOL_STATUS_OFFLINE_DEV
* ZPOOL_STATUS_REMOVED_DEV
Add device rebuild feature The device_rebuild feature enables sequential reconstruction when resilvering. Mirror vdevs can be rebuilt in LBA order which may more quickly restore redundancy depending on the pools average block size, overall fragmentation and the performance characteristics of the devices. However, block checksums cannot be verified as part of the rebuild thus a scrub is automatically started after the sequential resilver completes. The new '-s' option has been added to the `zpool attach` and `zpool replace` command to request sequential reconstruction instead of healing reconstruction when resilvering. zpool attach -s <pool> <existing vdev> <new vdev> zpool replace -s <pool> <old vdev> <new vdev> The `zpool status` output has been updated to report the progress of sequential resilvering in the same way as healing resilvering. The one notable difference is that multiple sequential resilvers may be in progress as long as they're operating on different top-level vdevs. The `zpool wait -t resilver` command was extended to wait on sequential resilvers. From this perspective they are no different than healing resilvers. Sequential resilvers cannot be supported for RAIDZ, but are compatible with the dRAID feature being developed. As part of this change the resilver_restart_* tests were moved in to the functional/replacement directory. Additionally, the replacement tests were renamed and extended to verify both resilvering and rebuilding. Original-patch-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: John Poduska <jpoduska@datto.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10349
2020-07-03 21:05:50 +03:00
* ZPOOL_STATUS_REBUILDING
* ZPOOL_STATUS_REBUILD_SCRUB
* ZPOOL_STATUS_OK
*/
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
};
#define NMSGID (sizeof (zfs_msgid_table) / sizeof (zfs_msgid_table[0]))
/* ARGSUSED */
static int
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
vdev_missing(vdev_stat_t *vs, uint_t vsc)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
return (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
vs->vs_aux == VDEV_AUX_OPEN_FAILED);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/* ARGSUSED */
static int
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
vdev_faulted(vdev_stat_t *vs, uint_t vsc)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
return (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_FAULTED);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/* ARGSUSED */
static int
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
vdev_errors(vdev_stat_t *vs, uint_t vsc)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
return (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_DEGRADED ||
vs->vs_read_errors != 0 || vs->vs_write_errors != 0 ||
vs->vs_checksum_errors != 0);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/* ARGSUSED */
static int
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
vdev_broken(vdev_stat_t *vs, uint_t vsc)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
return (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
/* ARGSUSED */
static int
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
vdev_offlined(vdev_stat_t *vs, uint_t vsc)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
return (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_OFFLINE);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
}
2009-08-18 22:43:27 +04:00
/* ARGSUSED */
static int
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
vdev_removed(vdev_stat_t *vs, uint_t vsc)
2009-08-18 22:43:27 +04:00
{
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
return (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_REMOVED);
}
static int
vdev_non_native_ashift(vdev_stat_t *vs, uint_t vsc)
{
if (getenv("ZPOOL_STATUS_NON_NATIVE_ASHIFT_IGNORE") != NULL)
return (0);
return (VDEV_STAT_VALID(vs_physical_ashift, vsc) &&
vs->vs_configured_ashift < vs->vs_physical_ashift);
2009-08-18 22:43:27 +04:00
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Detect if any leaf devices that have seen errors or could not be opened.
*/
static boolean_t
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
find_vdev_problem(nvlist_t *vdev, int (*func)(vdev_stat_t *, uint_t),
boolean_t ignore_replacing)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
nvlist_t **child;
vdev_stat_t *vs;
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
uint_t c, vsc, children;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Ignore problems within a 'replacing' vdev, since we're presumably in
* the process of repairing any such errors, and don't want to call them
* out again. We'll pick up the fact that a resilver is happening
* later.
*/
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (ignore_replacing == B_TRUE) {
char *type;
verify(nvlist_lookup_string(vdev, ZPOOL_CONFIG_TYPE,
&type) == 0);
if (strcmp(type, VDEV_TYPE_REPLACING) == 0)
return (B_FALSE);
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
if (nvlist_lookup_nvlist_array(vdev, ZPOOL_CONFIG_CHILDREN, &child,
&children) == 0) {
for (c = 0; c < children; c++)
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (find_vdev_problem(child[c], func, ignore_replacing))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (B_TRUE);
} else {
verify(nvlist_lookup_uint64_array(vdev, ZPOOL_CONFIG_VDEV_STATS,
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
(uint64_t **)&vs, &vsc) == 0);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (func(vs, vsc) != 0)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (B_TRUE);
}
/*
* Check any L2 cache devs
*/
if (nvlist_lookup_nvlist_array(vdev, ZPOOL_CONFIG_L2CACHE, &child,
&children) == 0) {
for (c = 0; c < children; c++)
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (find_vdev_problem(child[c], func, ignore_replacing))
return (B_TRUE);
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (B_FALSE);
}
/*
* Active pool health status.
*
* To determine the status for a pool, we make several passes over the config,
* picking the most egregious error we find. In order of importance, we do the
* following:
*
* - Check for a complete and valid configuration
* - Look for any faulted or missing devices in a non-replicated config
* - Check for any data errors
* - Check for any faulted or missing devices in a replicated config
* - Look for any devices showing errors
Add device rebuild feature The device_rebuild feature enables sequential reconstruction when resilvering. Mirror vdevs can be rebuilt in LBA order which may more quickly restore redundancy depending on the pools average block size, overall fragmentation and the performance characteristics of the devices. However, block checksums cannot be verified as part of the rebuild thus a scrub is automatically started after the sequential resilver completes. The new '-s' option has been added to the `zpool attach` and `zpool replace` command to request sequential reconstruction instead of healing reconstruction when resilvering. zpool attach -s <pool> <existing vdev> <new vdev> zpool replace -s <pool> <old vdev> <new vdev> The `zpool status` output has been updated to report the progress of sequential resilvering in the same way as healing resilvering. The one notable difference is that multiple sequential resilvers may be in progress as long as they're operating on different top-level vdevs. The `zpool wait -t resilver` command was extended to wait on sequential resilvers. From this perspective they are no different than healing resilvers. Sequential resilvers cannot be supported for RAIDZ, but are compatible with the dRAID feature being developed. As part of this change the resilver_restart_* tests were moved in to the functional/replacement directory. Additionally, the replacement tests were renamed and extended to verify both resilvering and rebuilding. Original-patch-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: John Poduska <jpoduska@datto.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10349
2020-07-03 21:05:50 +03:00
* - Check for any resilvering or rebuilding devices
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
*
* There can obviously be multiple errors within a single pool, so this routine
* only picks the most damaging of all the current errors to report.
*/
static zpool_status_t
Add generic errata infrastructure From time to time it may be necessary to inform the pool administrator about an errata which impacts their pool. These errata will by shown to the administrator through the 'zpool status' and 'zpool import' output as appropriate. The errata must clearly describe the issue detected, how the pool is impacted, and what action should be taken to resolve the situation. Additional information for each errata will be provided at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER. To accomplish the above this patch adds the required infrastructure to allow the kernel modules to notify the utilities that an errata has been detected. This is done through the ZPOOL_CONFIG_ERRATA uint64_t which has been added to the pool configuration nvlist. To add a new errata the following changes must be made: * A new errata identifier must be assigned by adding a new enum value to the zpool_errata_t type. New enums must be added to the end to preserve the existing ordering. * Code must be added to detect the issue. This does not strictly need to be done at pool import time but doing so will make the errata visible in 'zpool import' as well as 'zpool status'. Once detected the spa->spa_errata member should be set to the new enum. * If possible code should be added to clear the spa->spa_errata member once the errata has been resolved. * The show_import() and status_callback() functions must be updated to include an informational message describing the errata. This should include an action message describing what an administrator should do to address the errata. * The documentation at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER must be updated to describe the errata. This space can be used to provide as much additional information as needed to fully describe the errata. A link to this documentation will be automatically generated in the output of 'zpool import' and 'zpool status'. Original-idea-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.or Issue #2094
2014-02-21 07:57:17 +04:00
check_status(nvlist_t *config, boolean_t isimport, zpool_errata_t *erratap)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
nvlist_t *nvroot;
vdev_stat_t *vs;
pool_scan_stat_t *ps = NULL;
uint_t vsc, psc;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
uint64_t nerr;
uint64_t version;
uint64_t stateval;
uint64_t suspended;
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
uint64_t hostid = 0;
Add generic errata infrastructure From time to time it may be necessary to inform the pool administrator about an errata which impacts their pool. These errata will by shown to the administrator through the 'zpool status' and 'zpool import' output as appropriate. The errata must clearly describe the issue detected, how the pool is impacted, and what action should be taken to resolve the situation. Additional information for each errata will be provided at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER. To accomplish the above this patch adds the required infrastructure to allow the kernel modules to notify the utilities that an errata has been detected. This is done through the ZPOOL_CONFIG_ERRATA uint64_t which has been added to the pool configuration nvlist. To add a new errata the following changes must be made: * A new errata identifier must be assigned by adding a new enum value to the zpool_errata_t type. New enums must be added to the end to preserve the existing ordering. * Code must be added to detect the issue. This does not strictly need to be done at pool import time but doing so will make the errata visible in 'zpool import' as well as 'zpool status'. Once detected the spa->spa_errata member should be set to the new enum. * If possible code should be added to clear the spa->spa_errata member once the errata has been resolved. * The show_import() and status_callback() functions must be updated to include an informational message describing the errata. This should include an action message describing what an administrator should do to address the errata. * The documentation at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER must be updated to describe the errata. This space can be used to provide as much additional information as needed to fully describe the errata. A link to this documentation will be automatically generated in the output of 'zpool import' and 'zpool status'. Original-idea-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.or Issue #2094
2014-02-21 07:57:17 +04:00
uint64_t errata = 0;
unsigned long system_hostid = get_system_hostid();
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
verify(nvlist_lookup_uint64(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_VERSION,
&version) == 0);
verify(nvlist_lookup_nvlist(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_VDEV_TREE,
&nvroot) == 0);
verify(nvlist_lookup_uint64_array(nvroot, ZPOOL_CONFIG_VDEV_STATS,
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
(uint64_t **)&vs, &vsc) == 0);
verify(nvlist_lookup_uint64(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_POOL_STATE,
&stateval) == 0);
/*
* Currently resilvering a vdev
*/
(void) nvlist_lookup_uint64_array(nvroot, ZPOOL_CONFIG_SCAN_STATS,
(uint64_t **)&ps, &psc);
if (ps != NULL && ps->pss_func == POOL_SCAN_RESILVER &&
ps->pss_state == DSS_SCANNING)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_RESILVERING);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
Add device rebuild feature The device_rebuild feature enables sequential reconstruction when resilvering. Mirror vdevs can be rebuilt in LBA order which may more quickly restore redundancy depending on the pools average block size, overall fragmentation and the performance characteristics of the devices. However, block checksums cannot be verified as part of the rebuild thus a scrub is automatically started after the sequential resilver completes. The new '-s' option has been added to the `zpool attach` and `zpool replace` command to request sequential reconstruction instead of healing reconstruction when resilvering. zpool attach -s <pool> <existing vdev> <new vdev> zpool replace -s <pool> <old vdev> <new vdev> The `zpool status` output has been updated to report the progress of sequential resilvering in the same way as healing resilvering. The one notable difference is that multiple sequential resilvers may be in progress as long as they're operating on different top-level vdevs. The `zpool wait -t resilver` command was extended to wait on sequential resilvers. From this perspective they are no different than healing resilvers. Sequential resilvers cannot be supported for RAIDZ, but are compatible with the dRAID feature being developed. As part of this change the resilver_restart_* tests were moved in to the functional/replacement directory. Additionally, the replacement tests were renamed and extended to verify both resilvering and rebuilding. Original-patch-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: John Poduska <jpoduska@datto.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10349
2020-07-03 21:05:50 +03:00
/*
* Currently rebuilding a vdev, check top-level vdevs.
*/
vdev_rebuild_stat_t *vrs = NULL;
nvlist_t **child;
uint_t c, i, children;
uint64_t rebuild_end_time = 0;
if (nvlist_lookup_nvlist_array(nvroot, ZPOOL_CONFIG_CHILDREN,
&child, &children) == 0) {
for (c = 0; c < children; c++) {
if ((nvlist_lookup_uint64_array(child[c],
ZPOOL_CONFIG_REBUILD_STATS,
(uint64_t **)&vrs, &i) == 0) && (vrs != NULL)) {
uint64_t state = vrs->vrs_state;
if (state == VDEV_REBUILD_ACTIVE) {
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_REBUILDING);
} else if (state == VDEV_REBUILD_COMPLETE &&
vrs->vrs_end_time > rebuild_end_time) {
rebuild_end_time = vrs->vrs_end_time;
}
}
}
/*
* If we can determine when the last scrub was run, and it
* was before the last rebuild completed, then recommend
* that the pool be scrubbed to verify all checksums. When
* ps is NULL we can infer the pool has never been scrubbed.
*/
if (rebuild_end_time > 0) {
if (ps != NULL) {
if ((ps->pss_state == DSS_FINISHED &&
ps->pss_func == POOL_SCAN_SCRUB &&
rebuild_end_time > ps->pss_end_time) ||
ps->pss_state == DSS_NONE)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_REBUILD_SCRUB);
} else {
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_REBUILD_SCRUB);
}
}
}
Multi-modifier protection (MMP) Add multihost=on|off pool property to control MMP. When enabled a new thread writes uberblocks to the last slot in each label, at a set frequency, to indicate to other hosts the pool is actively imported. These uberblocks are the last synced uberblock with an updated timestamp. Property defaults to off. During tryimport, find the "best" uberblock (newest txg and timestamp) repeatedly, checking for change in the found uberblock. Include the results of the activity test in the config returned by tryimport. These results are reported to user in "zpool import". Allow the user to control the period between MMP writes, and the duration of the activity test on import, via a new module parameter zfs_multihost_interval. The period is specified in milliseconds. The activity test duration is calculated from this value, and from the mmp_delay in the "best" uberblock found initially. Add a kstat interface to export statistics about Multiple Modifier Protection (MMP) updates. Include the last synced txg number, the timestamp, the delay since the last MMP update, the VDEV GUID, the VDEV label that received the last MMP update, and the VDEV path. Abbreviated output below. $ cat /proc/spl/kstat/zfs/mypool/multihost 31 0 0x01 10 880 105092382393521 105144180101111 txg timestamp mmp_delay vdev_guid vdev_label vdev_path 20468 261337 250274925 68396651780 3 /dev/sda 20468 261339 252023374 6267402363293 1 /dev/sdc 20468 261340 252000858 6698080955233 1 /dev/sdx 20468 261341 251980635 783892869810 2 /dev/sdy 20468 261342 253385953 8923255792467 3 /dev/sdd 20468 261344 253336622 042125143176 0 /dev/sdab 20468 261345 253310522 1200778101278 2 /dev/sde 20468 261346 253286429 0950576198362 2 /dev/sdt 20468 261347 253261545 96209817917 3 /dev/sds 20468 261349 253238188 8555725937673 3 /dev/sdb Add a new tunable zfs_multihost_history to specify the number of MMP updates to store history for. By default it is set to zero meaning that no MMP statistics are stored. When using ztest to generate activity, for automated tests of the MMP function, some test functions interfere with the test. For example, the pool is exported to run zdb and then imported again. Add a new ztest function, "-M", to alter ztest behavior to prevent this. Add new tests to verify the new functionality. Tests provided by Giuseppe Di Natale. Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Giuseppe Di Natale <dinatale2@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Ned Bass <bass6@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Olaf Faaland <faaland1@llnl.gov> Closes #745 Closes #6279
2017-07-08 06:20:35 +03:00
/*
* The multihost property is set and the pool may be active.
*/
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
vs->vs_aux == VDEV_AUX_ACTIVE) {
mmp_state_t mmp_state;
nvlist_t *nvinfo;
nvinfo = fnvlist_lookup_nvlist(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_LOAD_INFO);
mmp_state = fnvlist_lookup_uint64(nvinfo,
ZPOOL_CONFIG_MMP_STATE);
if (mmp_state == MMP_STATE_ACTIVE)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_HOSTID_ACTIVE);
else if (mmp_state == MMP_STATE_NO_HOSTID)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_HOSTID_REQUIRED);
else
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_HOSTID_MISMATCH);
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Pool last accessed by another system.
*/
(void) nvlist_lookup_uint64(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_HOSTID, &hostid);
if (hostid != 0 && (unsigned long)hostid != system_hostid &&
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
stateval == POOL_STATE_ACTIVE)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_HOSTID_MISMATCH);
/*
* Newer on-disk version.
*/
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
vs->vs_aux == VDEV_AUX_VERSION_NEWER)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_VERSION_NEWER);
/*
* Unsupported feature(s).
*/
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
vs->vs_aux == VDEV_AUX_UNSUP_FEAT) {
nvlist_t *nvinfo;
verify(nvlist_lookup_nvlist(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_LOAD_INFO,
&nvinfo) == 0);
if (nvlist_exists(nvinfo, ZPOOL_CONFIG_CAN_RDONLY))
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_UNSUP_FEAT_WRITE);
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_UNSUP_FEAT_READ);
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Check that the config is complete.
*/
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
vs->vs_aux == VDEV_AUX_BAD_GUID_SUM)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_BAD_GUID_SUM);
/*
* Check whether the pool has suspended.
*/
if (nvlist_lookup_uint64(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_SUSPENDED,
&suspended) == 0) {
uint64_t reason;
if (nvlist_lookup_uint64(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_SUSPENDED_REASON,
&reason) == 0 && reason == ZIO_SUSPEND_MMP)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_IO_FAILURE_MMP);
if (suspended == ZIO_FAILURE_MODE_CONTINUE)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_IO_FAILURE_CONTINUE);
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_IO_FAILURE_WAIT);
}
/*
* Could not read a log.
*/
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
vs->vs_aux == VDEV_AUX_BAD_LOG) {
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_BAD_LOG);
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Bad devices in non-replicated config.
*/
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_faulted, B_TRUE))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_FAULTED_DEV_NR);
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_missing, B_TRUE))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_MISSING_DEV_NR);
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_broken, B_TRUE))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_LABEL_NR);
/*
* Corrupted pool metadata
*/
if (vs->vs_state == VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN &&
vs->vs_aux == VDEV_AUX_CORRUPT_DATA)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_POOL);
/*
* Persistent data errors.
*/
if (!isimport) {
if (nvlist_lookup_uint64(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_ERRCOUNT,
&nerr) == 0 && nerr != 0)
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_DATA);
}
/*
* Missing devices in a replicated config.
*/
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_faulted, B_TRUE))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_FAULTED_DEV_R);
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_missing, B_TRUE))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_MISSING_DEV_R);
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_broken, B_TRUE))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_CORRUPT_LABEL_R);
/*
* Devices with errors
*/
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (!isimport && find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_errors, B_TRUE))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_FAILING_DEV);
/*
* Offlined devices
*/
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_offlined, B_TRUE))
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_OFFLINE_DEV);
2009-08-18 22:43:27 +04:00
/*
* Removed device
*/
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
if (find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_removed, B_TRUE))
2009-08-18 22:43:27 +04:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_REMOVED_DEV);
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 22:53:17 +03:00
/*
* Suboptimal, but usable, ashift configuration.
*/
if (find_vdev_problem(nvroot, vdev_non_native_ashift, B_FALSE))
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_NON_NATIVE_ASHIFT);
Encryption Stability and On-Disk Format Fixes The on-disk format for encrypted datasets protects not only the encrypted and authenticated blocks themselves, but also the order and interpretation of these blocks. In order to make this work while maintaining the ability to do raw sends, the indirect bps maintain a secure checksum of all the MACs in the block below it along with a few other fields that determine how the data is interpreted. Unfortunately, the current on-disk format erroneously includes some fields which are not portable and thus cannot support raw sends. It is not possible to easily work around this issue due to a separate and much smaller bug which causes indirect blocks for encrypted dnodes to not be compressed, which conflicts with the previous bug. In addition, the current code generates incompatible on-disk formats on big endian and little endian systems due to an issue with how block pointers are authenticated. Finally, raw send streams do not currently include dn_maxblkid when sending both the metadnode and normal dnodes which are needed in order to ensure that we are correctly maintaining the portable objset MAC. This patch zero's out the offending fields when computing the bp MAC and ensures that these MACs are always calculated in little endian order (regardless of the host system's byte order). This patch also registers an errata for the old on-disk format, which we detect by adding a "version" field to newly created DSL Crypto Keys. We allow datasets without a version (version 0) to only be mounted for read so that they can easily be migrated. We also now include dn_maxblkid in raw send streams to ensure the MAC can be maintained correctly. This patch also contains minor bug fixes and cleanups. Reviewed-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com> Closes #6845 Closes #6864 Closes #7052
2017-11-08 22:12:59 +03:00
/*
* Informational errata available.
*/
(void) nvlist_lookup_uint64(config, ZPOOL_CONFIG_ERRATA, &errata);
if (errata) {
*erratap = errata;
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_ERRATA);
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
/*
* Outdated, but usable, version
*/
if (SPA_VERSION_IS_SUPPORTED(version) && version != SPA_VERSION)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_VERSION_OLDER);
/*
* Usable pool with disabled features
*/
if (version >= SPA_VERSION_FEATURES) {
int i;
nvlist_t *feat;
if (isimport) {
feat = fnvlist_lookup_nvlist(config,
ZPOOL_CONFIG_LOAD_INFO);
Multi-modifier protection (MMP) Add multihost=on|off pool property to control MMP. When enabled a new thread writes uberblocks to the last slot in each label, at a set frequency, to indicate to other hosts the pool is actively imported. These uberblocks are the last synced uberblock with an updated timestamp. Property defaults to off. During tryimport, find the "best" uberblock (newest txg and timestamp) repeatedly, checking for change in the found uberblock. Include the results of the activity test in the config returned by tryimport. These results are reported to user in "zpool import". Allow the user to control the period between MMP writes, and the duration of the activity test on import, via a new module parameter zfs_multihost_interval. The period is specified in milliseconds. The activity test duration is calculated from this value, and from the mmp_delay in the "best" uberblock found initially. Add a kstat interface to export statistics about Multiple Modifier Protection (MMP) updates. Include the last synced txg number, the timestamp, the delay since the last MMP update, the VDEV GUID, the VDEV label that received the last MMP update, and the VDEV path. Abbreviated output below. $ cat /proc/spl/kstat/zfs/mypool/multihost 31 0 0x01 10 880 105092382393521 105144180101111 txg timestamp mmp_delay vdev_guid vdev_label vdev_path 20468 261337 250274925 68396651780 3 /dev/sda 20468 261339 252023374 6267402363293 1 /dev/sdc 20468 261340 252000858 6698080955233 1 /dev/sdx 20468 261341 251980635 783892869810 2 /dev/sdy 20468 261342 253385953 8923255792467 3 /dev/sdd 20468 261344 253336622 042125143176 0 /dev/sdab 20468 261345 253310522 1200778101278 2 /dev/sde 20468 261346 253286429 0950576198362 2 /dev/sdt 20468 261347 253261545 96209817917 3 /dev/sds 20468 261349 253238188 8555725937673 3 /dev/sdb Add a new tunable zfs_multihost_history to specify the number of MMP updates to store history for. By default it is set to zero meaning that no MMP statistics are stored. When using ztest to generate activity, for automated tests of the MMP function, some test functions interfere with the test. For example, the pool is exported to run zdb and then imported again. Add a new ztest function, "-M", to alter ztest behavior to prevent this. Add new tests to verify the new functionality. Tests provided by Giuseppe Di Natale. Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Giuseppe Di Natale <dinatale2@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Ned Bass <bass6@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Olaf Faaland <faaland1@llnl.gov> Closes #745 Closes #6279
2017-07-08 06:20:35 +03:00
if (nvlist_exists(feat, ZPOOL_CONFIG_ENABLED_FEAT))
feat = fnvlist_lookup_nvlist(feat,
ZPOOL_CONFIG_ENABLED_FEAT);
} else {
feat = fnvlist_lookup_nvlist(config,
ZPOOL_CONFIG_FEATURE_STATS);
}
for (i = 0; i < SPA_FEATURES; i++) {
zfeature_info_t *fi = &spa_feature_table[i];
if (!nvlist_exists(feat, fi->fi_guid))
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_FEAT_DISABLED);
}
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ZPOOL_STATUS_OK);
}
zpool_status_t
Add generic errata infrastructure From time to time it may be necessary to inform the pool administrator about an errata which impacts their pool. These errata will by shown to the administrator through the 'zpool status' and 'zpool import' output as appropriate. The errata must clearly describe the issue detected, how the pool is impacted, and what action should be taken to resolve the situation. Additional information for each errata will be provided at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER. To accomplish the above this patch adds the required infrastructure to allow the kernel modules to notify the utilities that an errata has been detected. This is done through the ZPOOL_CONFIG_ERRATA uint64_t which has been added to the pool configuration nvlist. To add a new errata the following changes must be made: * A new errata identifier must be assigned by adding a new enum value to the zpool_errata_t type. New enums must be added to the end to preserve the existing ordering. * Code must be added to detect the issue. This does not strictly need to be done at pool import time but doing so will make the errata visible in 'zpool import' as well as 'zpool status'. Once detected the spa->spa_errata member should be set to the new enum. * If possible code should be added to clear the spa->spa_errata member once the errata has been resolved. * The show_import() and status_callback() functions must be updated to include an informational message describing the errata. This should include an action message describing what an administrator should do to address the errata. * The documentation at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER must be updated to describe the errata. This space can be used to provide as much additional information as needed to fully describe the errata. A link to this documentation will be automatically generated in the output of 'zpool import' and 'zpool status'. Original-idea-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.or Issue #2094
2014-02-21 07:57:17 +04:00
zpool_get_status(zpool_handle_t *zhp, char **msgid, zpool_errata_t *errata)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
Add generic errata infrastructure From time to time it may be necessary to inform the pool administrator about an errata which impacts their pool. These errata will by shown to the administrator through the 'zpool status' and 'zpool import' output as appropriate. The errata must clearly describe the issue detected, how the pool is impacted, and what action should be taken to resolve the situation. Additional information for each errata will be provided at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER. To accomplish the above this patch adds the required infrastructure to allow the kernel modules to notify the utilities that an errata has been detected. This is done through the ZPOOL_CONFIG_ERRATA uint64_t which has been added to the pool configuration nvlist. To add a new errata the following changes must be made: * A new errata identifier must be assigned by adding a new enum value to the zpool_errata_t type. New enums must be added to the end to preserve the existing ordering. * Code must be added to detect the issue. This does not strictly need to be done at pool import time but doing so will make the errata visible in 'zpool import' as well as 'zpool status'. Once detected the spa->spa_errata member should be set to the new enum. * If possible code should be added to clear the spa->spa_errata member once the errata has been resolved. * The show_import() and status_callback() functions must be updated to include an informational message describing the errata. This should include an action message describing what an administrator should do to address the errata. * The documentation at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER must be updated to describe the errata. This space can be used to provide as much additional information as needed to fully describe the errata. A link to this documentation will be automatically generated in the output of 'zpool import' and 'zpool status'. Original-idea-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.or Issue #2094
2014-02-21 07:57:17 +04:00
zpool_status_t ret = check_status(zhp->zpool_config, B_FALSE, errata);
if (msgid != NULL) {
if (ret >= NMSGID)
*msgid = NULL;
else
*msgid = zfs_msgid_table[ret];
}
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
return (ret);
}
zpool_status_t
Add generic errata infrastructure From time to time it may be necessary to inform the pool administrator about an errata which impacts their pool. These errata will by shown to the administrator through the 'zpool status' and 'zpool import' output as appropriate. The errata must clearly describe the issue detected, how the pool is impacted, and what action should be taken to resolve the situation. Additional information for each errata will be provided at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER. To accomplish the above this patch adds the required infrastructure to allow the kernel modules to notify the utilities that an errata has been detected. This is done through the ZPOOL_CONFIG_ERRATA uint64_t which has been added to the pool configuration nvlist. To add a new errata the following changes must be made: * A new errata identifier must be assigned by adding a new enum value to the zpool_errata_t type. New enums must be added to the end to preserve the existing ordering. * Code must be added to detect the issue. This does not strictly need to be done at pool import time but doing so will make the errata visible in 'zpool import' as well as 'zpool status'. Once detected the spa->spa_errata member should be set to the new enum. * If possible code should be added to clear the spa->spa_errata member once the errata has been resolved. * The show_import() and status_callback() functions must be updated to include an informational message describing the errata. This should include an action message describing what an administrator should do to address the errata. * The documentation at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER must be updated to describe the errata. This space can be used to provide as much additional information as needed to fully describe the errata. A link to this documentation will be automatically generated in the output of 'zpool import' and 'zpool status'. Original-idea-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.or Issue #2094
2014-02-21 07:57:17 +04:00
zpool_import_status(nvlist_t *config, char **msgid, zpool_errata_t *errata)
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
{
Add generic errata infrastructure From time to time it may be necessary to inform the pool administrator about an errata which impacts their pool. These errata will by shown to the administrator through the 'zpool status' and 'zpool import' output as appropriate. The errata must clearly describe the issue detected, how the pool is impacted, and what action should be taken to resolve the situation. Additional information for each errata will be provided at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER. To accomplish the above this patch adds the required infrastructure to allow the kernel modules to notify the utilities that an errata has been detected. This is done through the ZPOOL_CONFIG_ERRATA uint64_t which has been added to the pool configuration nvlist. To add a new errata the following changes must be made: * A new errata identifier must be assigned by adding a new enum value to the zpool_errata_t type. New enums must be added to the end to preserve the existing ordering. * Code must be added to detect the issue. This does not strictly need to be done at pool import time but doing so will make the errata visible in 'zpool import' as well as 'zpool status'. Once detected the spa->spa_errata member should be set to the new enum. * If possible code should be added to clear the spa->spa_errata member once the errata has been resolved. * The show_import() and status_callback() functions must be updated to include an informational message describing the errata. This should include an action message describing what an administrator should do to address the errata. * The documentation at http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-ER must be updated to describe the errata. This space can be used to provide as much additional information as needed to fully describe the errata. A link to this documentation will be automatically generated in the output of 'zpool import' and 'zpool status'. Original-idea-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.or Issue #2094
2014-02-21 07:57:17 +04:00
zpool_status_t ret = check_status(config, B_TRUE, errata);
2008-11-20 23:01:55 +03:00
if (ret >= NMSGID)
*msgid = NULL;
else
*msgid = zfs_msgid_table[ret];
return (ret);
}